Post: Why Ground Vehicles Were Left Out Of Modern Warfare 2 Multilpayer.
07-17-2010, 03:28 AM #1
Edgardo678
Little One
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Below Is A Video Of Robert Bowling (fourzerotwo) and Lead Designer For Infinity Ward Todd Alderman Discussing The Video Game Hit
Call Of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsnBuZh1HVE"]YouTube - Vehicles Left Out of 'Modern Warfare 2'[/ame]

They Basically Just Said That They Didn't Add Vehicles Because They Want People To be Be Focused On Playing The Game And The Action Instead Of Fighting Over Who Gets The Vehicle. Even Though It Was Highly Requested By Fans They Just Don't Want To Ruin The Flow Of The Game.

What Do You Think?
Should There Be Ground Vehicles Or Is That Too Much Of An Advantage?

If So Should They Be Controllable Like The AC-130 Or Should They Be Automatic Like The Pavelow?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
07-17-2010, 11:37 PM #20
Superman.
Is it a bird? ... Is it a plane?
no, there shouldn't be vehicles.....there should also not be noob fuking tubes!!
07-17-2010, 11:41 PM #21
I HATED tanks in world at war because whoever got in it first would end up with like 50 for 2, just today my brother got a 31 ks in a tank without even trying! They were right to leave them out, one thing they did get right i think :P
07-18-2010, 12:33 AM #22
Edgardo678
Little One
Originally posted by Tall31 View Post
MW2 and battlefield are two different games. They shouldnt be included in call of duty because call of duty already has kill streak rewards which are powerful enough. Also map size would become a major issue. Maps like wasteland and derail arent even big enough for player controled vehicles like tanks.

Also a players skill is what determines the outcome in call of duty (the exception being noob tubes and launchers). Tanks and other vehicles would create issues that would be considered cheap and overpowered by the majority of the mw2 community. Trust me the whining and complaining is bad enough already. Vehicles would only bring the game down and make it less enjoyable.


That's Why They Should Require Large Amount Of Kills And Not Just Plain Luck, But Skill. Who Cares If They Have To Work On Making Maps Bigger That's What They Are Supposed To Do. If They Get Everything Just Right It Can Easily Become An Enjoyable Game For Everyone Including Newcomers. Along The Way Of Creating Maps They Might Catch A Glitch Or Two That Would've Majorly Ruined The Game For Everyone.
07-18-2010, 03:43 AM #23
Making bigger maps takes money and distracts from certain game modes. Which is another reason why there are no ground vehicles. Tanks didnt work in WaW and it wont work in any other type of call of duty game. Fact is fact, Call of Duty is better without them.
07-20-2010, 03:09 AM #24
Edgardo678
Little One
Originally posted by Tall31 View Post
Making bigger maps takes money and distracts from certain game modes. Which is another reason why there are no ground vehicles. Tanks didnt work in WaW and it wont work in any other type of call of duty game. Fact is fact, Call of Duty is better without them.


Never Thought Of That
07-22-2010, 06:12 AM #25
Edgardo678
Little One
I Really Wouldn't Care If They Spend More Money If They Spend More Time On The Game It Will Make It Better And Sell More.
07-22-2010, 02:28 PM #26
Originally posted by Cyber
They really would change the pace of the game a lot and would end up being overpowered.


tanks jeeps ect would be underpowered like sniper rifles

and if you realy want that stuff do bcbf2, its very balanced except sniper rifles as in most games
07-22-2010, 02:32 PM #27
I kind of like tanks in cod 5.
07-22-2010, 09:58 PM #28
Edgardo678
Little One
Originally posted by Me View Post
tanks jeeps ect would be underpowered like sniper rifles

and if you realy want that stuff do bcbf2, its very balanced except sniper rifles as in most games


I'll Try That Game.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo