Post: How many of you want to see Infinity Ward do another Call of Duty?
11-17-2010, 03:32 PM #1
luther1995
I am error
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); As We all know Treyarch have failed with many things on Black Ops, But how much did we like Modern Warfare 2? These are all the things i think have gone wrong with Black Ops:

Hitmarkers
Campers
Host advantage
LAG!
Noob tubes already
Quick Scoping
Sniping altogether.

So what i want to know are Treyarch going to fix this? And are Infinity Ward going to make another Call of Duty.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
11-19-2010, 02:40 AM #11
JKLAZ
Who’s Jim Erased?
Mw2>Blackcocks

The following 3 users say thank you to JKLAZ for this useful post:

destroyer5678, Faroskalin, J.E.T.S
11-19-2010, 03:56 AM #12
Sk8erFerSur
NyanNyanNyanNyanNyanNyan
I'd like to see IW try to, you know make up for all the glitches and bugs in MW2 with a MW3? or you know something like that in around 1 year? Maybe 2?
11-19-2010, 03:56 AM #13
As much as people hated the shit MW2, it's still a game you keep coming back to, it applies to me, and I'm just a normal joe gamer, so I'm in the majority.

MW2 was a great-****ing game, the game mechanics, physics, graphics fantastic, none that beats it atm, not BC2, BO, MoH. However, BO's customizing would have rocked on MW2, because the gun and sounds kicked ass on MW2, I just can't imagine how great a game if the best of MW2 and BO had a one night stand, made mind-blowing sex, ruptured a condom, and resulted in some kind of freakish perfect offspring. God, the thought of it makes me sweat.

As much as people say BO maps are "fair," they don't seem alive to me. They got no character. It's not memorable. It seems to me they just grabbed a couple buildings and textures and objects and dumped it into the map, and say, voila, have fun with it. MW2 maps like Terminal and/or Scrapyard and/or Karachi look great, play great; so much layers to them, like a high part, a mid part, and a bottom part, stairs, buildings for flanking, great shmoyo like that. I can't seem to find any in BO? Nothing wrong with that.

For the time being, I still rock the MW2. Hey, make fun of me all you want, call me a OMAtube-fag, commando noob, can't deal with recoil moron, BlackOps/Treyarch hater-jackass, things like that, but none of it is true. I love MW2 for the forementioned items, some that makes me believe outweigh that greats that BO may have brought by Treyarch. For those who love BO, sure, rock on bro, love what you play, it's a game after-all, why play a game you don't enjoy right?

So my final answer is yes, I will defi-****ing-nately play a game IW makes, CoD 7 perhaps? MW3? Not really the World War III aspect, but the game itself. You don't think IW would redeem itself after the shit that's been blown from a fan to them? Then you're naive, because MW3 would be a kickass game. :carling:

The following 2 users say thank you to Faroskalin for this useful post:

Thristle, xXM@DM@RCXx
11-24-2010, 05:48 PM #14
xXM@DM@RCXx
Maggbot timeout!
Originally posted by faroskalin View Post
as much as people hated the shit mw2, it's still a game you keep coming back to, it applies to me, and i'm just a normal joe gamer, so i'm in the majority.

Mw2 was a great-****ing game, the game mechanics, physics, graphics fantastic, none that beats it atm, not bc2, bo, moh. However, bo's customizing would have rocked on mw2, because the gun and sounds kicked ass on mw2, i just can't imagine how great a game if the best of mw2 and bo had a one night stand, made mind-blowing sex, ruptured a condom, and resulted in some kind of freakish perfect offspring. God, the thought of it makes me sweat.

As much as people say bo maps are "fair," they don't seem alive to me. They got no character. It's not memorable. It seems to me they just grabbed a couple buildings and textures and objects and dumped it into the map, and say, voila, have fun with it. Mw2 maps like terminal and/or scrapyard and/or karachi look great, play great; so much layers to them, like a high part, a mid part, and a bottom part, stairs, buildings for flanking, great shmoyo like that. I can't seem to find any in bo? Nothing wrong with that.

For the time being, i still rock the mw2. Hey, make fun of me all you want, call me a omatube-fag, commando noob, can't deal with recoil moron, blackops/treyarch hater-jackass, things like that, but none of it is true. I love mw2 for the forementioned items, some that makes me believe outweigh that greats that bo may have brought by treyarch. For those who love bo, sure, rock on bro, love what you play, it's a game after-all, why play a game you don't enjoy right?

So my final answer is yes, i will defi-****ing-nately play a game iw makes, cod 7 perhaps? Mw3? Not really the world war iii aspect, but the game itself. You don't think iw would redeem itself after the shit that's been blown from a fan to them? Then you're naive, because mw3 would be a kickass game. :carling:


what he^^^^^^ said! Smile

The following user thanked xXM@DM@RCXx for this useful post:

Mr. Slim
11-24-2010, 07:06 PM #15
I never bothered with black ops, but hope IW make modern warfare 3, I'll buy it if they do.

Gears 3 first though :dance:
11-24-2010, 07:43 PM #16
Originally posted by Angelo View Post
i'm in two minds to be honest, i prefer the way IW do their online but i prefer tryarches way of doing campaign and features.

IW's online had so much wrong with it but it was still fun. like no matter how frustrated you was that you got shot by a quickscoper from the other side of the map while you was behind a wall, you still had the urge to get your revenge.

on blackops the way you get screwed over is completly unfair and not fun. for example:

Blast radius of an RPG-7 is that of a baked bean, the n00b tube doesn't kill someone point blank just because it hit a ledge infront of them. the knifing is aweful. you can get shot and killed even though you've ran around a corner with a 30ft thick wall because your oponent got a single hit marker. the bullet penetration on black ops means there may as well be no scenery as you can shoot through practically anything.
yet black ops campaign is fantastic, its bloody challenging too and is fun, IW always make the solo too short and too easy, i did veteran in like 45mins yet i'm stuck on black ops because its bloody hard.



I agree with this shit here.
11-25-2010, 03:47 AM #17
i hate thhee acr they just need take that gun away
11-25-2010, 05:08 PM #18
xXM@DM@RCXx
Maggbot timeout!
Put it this way if IW dont make the next C.O.D i wont be to eager to buy it, but then again if respawn or sledge hammer games make it i might give them a try. But i wont be buying anything made by treyarch ever again.
11-25-2010, 05:23 PM #19
Mr. Slim
COLE WORLD!
Originally posted by Angelo View Post
i'm in two minds to be honest, i prefer the way IW do their online but i prefer tryarches way of doing campaign and features.

IW's online had so much wrong with it but it was still fun. like no matter how frustrated you was that you got shot by a quickscoper from the other side of the map while you was behind a wall, you still had the urge to get your revenge.

on blackops the way you get screwed over is completly unfair and not fun. for example:

Blast radius of an RPG-7 is that of a baked bean, the n00b tube doesn't kill someone point blank just because it hit a ledge infront of them. the knifing is aweful. you can get shot and killed even though you've ran around a corner with a 30ft thick wall because your oponent got a single hit marker. the bullet penetration on black ops means there may as well be no scenery as you can shoot through practically anything.

yet black ops campaign is fantastic, its bloody challenging too and is fun, IW always make the solo too short and too easy, i did veteran in like 45mins yet i'm stuck on black ops because its bloody hard.


This is what i've been saying all along they're good in 2 seperate categories to me.

The following user thanked Mr. Slim for this useful post:

xXM@DM@RCXx

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo