(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); kk so im sorta sick of people being all OMFG ONE IS BETTER THEN THE OTHER STFU!

i wanna know what you think but you gotta give reasons.. try not to get to pasionate.. its just 2 games.

ill start off the debate by saying i think that mw2 could be funner sorta.. but all in all WAW is better cuz i could nolife it forever and not get bored.

Here are my reasons

Why Waw Owns / sucks

Mp40 - fun as hell to use and you are insane with it/ sorta makes the game 1 dimensional but its still fun.. i had around 60k kills with it

Health bar/ Juggernaut - you can live long enough to not kill somebody or heal and not rage and punch your sofa and quit / it sorta makes it unfair because its so good

Maps - classic, realistic ( cuz they were real ) and all in all very fun.. eg dome was perfect, not to massive but small enough so its action packed/ i can't think of cons tbh..

Rifles - k im sorry you may think they were underpowered but they were not. they added such a new flavor rather then the fall/ they were a bit under powered if not used properally

Elites - Get good at the game, nobody can touch you ( not literally ) but if you were good you would have good results its not catering to the noobs / makes it hard for new players

k i don't wanna go overboard with WAW so ill start mw2


Killstreaks - SOOO MUCH VARIETY ITS AMAZING / for a few weeks til you realize everybody starts camping for nukes and stuff

Snipers - unlike waw they're not underpowered with thermal scopes and multi clipped and rapid fire shots/ they're OP now because you could just spray at close distance

Shotguns - Fun to use/ OP. ( understatement )

No Tanks - yeah self explanatory though tanks were alright they just slow things down if your in them or are a pain in the ass if your not.

Final Words

Overall waw is just more fun for me and i liked it a lot more.. it was addicting and when it got boring even though it rarely did, you could chill @ nazi zombies and stuff. There are things i forget to mention but im pretty sure they'll come up.


btw cod4 was legit but its not in the debate

Yeah WAW was fun. MW2 gets boring really easily. Anyway nice thread.

They both have similarities such as a lot of people using the same gun. On WaW it was the MP40, and on MW2 I would say its mostly the Scar-H. I like the killstreaks but yes since there is more killstreaks, there will be more campers wanting the nuke. Overall I would probably say I like them both pretty even. At the moment i like MW2 better, but thats just because its new. Im sure I will get sick of it.

kk well i don't have mw2 and you don't gotta be so angry about it but im just comparing the 2 and asking for people's opinions id like it if you wouldn't be such a 7 year old about it


anyways as for your post i disagree with your guns because WAW had more to offer rather than fast firing no recoiling rifles and useless smgs

martyrdome never really botherd me to much but mw2 does win there


juggernaut comment is true but mw2 health bar it way to low.

betties > claymores hands down.


most of your points were really small and you overlooked how big of an inpact maps and co - op modes have on a game

if you noticed i did say Politely, i could of been alot worse, and just so you know i wasn't directing it at you, i was directing it at every body who is complaining about mw2



just a quick question, did you mainly use the mp40? honestly
if so that's my point proven, and as for the guns, yes their was a lot of variety however 90% of WaW only used mp40, every game in mw2 i play people use different guns




yes i agree to a point, but its better than it was in waw where i had to empty 1 whole clip+ into an enemy just to kill them



no because claymore's are directional, bettys weren't, they were for noobs and they were poorly designed, didn't even need to be near them t go off, as if they were modeled properly then you would have to be on them to trigger them




no, as i said, WaW wins in terms of maps (this means design and playability) however WaW had 3 map packs, there's still DLC to come from MW2, so dont count MW2 out just yet

And the same goes for Spec-ops, Zombies was good, but it too had serious flaws and 3 Map's, theres still DLC to come which might bring something new to spec-ops and make it just as good

i tink treyarch takes way to much stick for one of the best games i have ever played. it may even be THE best game i played. i got bored of cod 4 after a week and cod 6 ive pretiged once and i cant be bothered to play anymore. WAW i went all the way and didnt get bored. Just so much more better, Would rather play nazi zombies than spec ops and i love the campaign on waw Sooooo.. my tyrade is other

Not much people play WAW on ps3 only 22000 people max.. MW2 has 200000 plus

Tbh I hated WAW but I sold traded cod4(stupid idea) for camperswarfare2, mw2 in one word, it's LAME.

And it's lame because all these little add-ons eg.. Heartbeat sensors, k camping is lame as it is, but IW decide to chuck them in? All they do is incourage people to camp.. And pain killer if your shit enough to get kill 4 times in a row, rage quit!

BF:BC2 FTW!! Or Xbox FTW!!

heartbeat sensors.. painkiller just ruin the mw2.. I wish juggernaut returned because you would know which player on the opposition has it after killing them once.. Painkiller just ruin killstreaks..

yeah you make a lot of good points although tbh for me the biggest factors are the core of the game.. and imo thats maps, simplicity, how long you can play it without getting bored and generally how you feel while playing it

in mw2 maps are okay and you did mention the map packs are yet to be released, its sorta complicated but gets simple after you play it for a week but the thing it lacks is just it doesn't grip me with anything and i don't feel addicted to it

i think that the game is to based on little flashy things such as kill streaks, heartbeat sensors and things which seem cool at first but in the end are exploited and make the game much worse which is where simplicity comes to play

on a side note good arguments i never thought of some of that stuff and now think slightly more of mw2 although i still think cod5 is better ^

you can't convince me the mp40 was bad for the game though.. sure it was op but it was fun as well to use and i don't think 90% of people used it.. well yeah they used it but not all the time. Lets face it there will always be an overpowered gun in these games in mw2 its prob the ACR or at a low lv the scar.. might as well make the guns fun to use if their op


---------- Post added at 04:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:07 PM ----------



that really dosn't matter to much to me.. mw2 has more hype and people want to play it more because everybody plays it and its new.. dosn't mean its better

im a perfect example.. im not trash talking mw2, its fun as hell i just think waw was better but am currently playing mw2 because lets face it.. who could play an old game for a long amount of time when a newer version is out.. even if you think the older game is better

i hope you don't think im a hypocrite but i can't change the way see this

---------- Post added at 04:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:09 PM ----------



yeah well some would argue that painkiller isn't perm but i didn't mind juggernaut to much because it takes a bit more skill to kill somebody with it rather then get a few luckey shots off with m16