Post: Who is happy quickscoping is returning?
Options
07-29-2011, 08:26 AM
#1
Wondoh
Former Staff
Let me enlighten you with this thread
For me I thought quickscoping was great on Mw2 and when the game got boring thats all I used to do. Now I play black ops and ive gotten back into using machine guns.
But has quickscoping affected all gamers?
Since quickscoping invaded Mw2 you couldnt snipe without be called a hardscoper. The whole game turned into quickscoping and if you used a machine gun your classed as shitty noob :confused:
This has moved on from Mw2 and also is similar in black ops. If your sniping and you get a final kill you can expect to be called a hardscoper.
Quickscoping has changed the way snipers are portrayed. A sniper is meant to sit somewhere hidden with a great view of the battlefield and pick enemys off. This was how it was originally in COD4 where "true" sniping was.
Now if your using a sniper you have to quickscope otherwise your a noob.
I guess what Im saying is that are you really happy for quickscoping to be brought back?
I know people like optic and faze will be happy but in my opinion quickscoping montages are getting really boring and its the same old thing all the time.
I for one probably would have said yeah im happy with quickscoping returning about a year ago, but now id rather it be gone then in the game. Id rather be able to play my way without having someone call me a noob cos Im not quickscoping. :y:
It may just seem like Im having a rant but I want to hear your views on if you think that its good that quickscoping will return.
The only thing I can hope for is that all the quickscopers use the snipers only game type which is rumoured to be in the game.
The following 4 users say thank you to Wondoh for this useful post:
The following user groaned Wondoh for this awful post:
08-04-2011, 04:27 PM
#84
DC12X
S.P.E.C.I.A.L
Originally posted by whitey775
Fair enough for writing all of this if its not your first language. For that i apologise.
First off im not "that guy" that would try to quickscope at knife range on last man on Search and Destroy, unlike some quickscopers i enjoy playing the objective, kills just come as a bonus. So you won't see me doing a 720, claymore cancel, ladder shot on final killcam. And i most certainly am not an "Optic Fanboy" yeah i admire what they do because there amazing at COD but i dont strive to be like them i just enjoy quickscoping.
So it seems to me you think im one of those gimps that shouts "HARDSCOPE" down the mic all the time and constantly goes for stupid kills and ends up on 0-20. You are wrong. For the majority of games i play with the intervention or the barrett. But if im not in the mood ill play with other guns like the SCAR and F2000. For example the other day I went 38-2 on trailer park with a SCAR, then the game after went 27-1 with an intervention on derail, im such a bad player.
I dont know what games you play but most snipers i see use FMJ. If you see an enemy there gonna do one of two things either come at you and shoot or run off. FMJ is used for the second scenario because chances are they'll run behind something or into a building. And your forgetting 40 FMJ kills are needed to unlock extended mags. I got that in 10 games when i prestiged the other day, so dont talk as if you know it all.
You are again mistaken with this notion that hitmarkers are a rare occurence and that your always guaranteed a one hit kill. Why do you think so many people rage about hitmarkers? Because they are a lot more common than you think. Heck i played a private game the other day on miniscule health and still got the occasional hit markers.
Once again will you stop chatting about the aim assist because everyone knows it helps out more so on AR's than it does with sniper rifles, are you just plain stupid or just ridiculously childish and stubborn.
I argue for it for a reason because people like you are always trying to put it down to "taking advantage of game mechanics" and other such bull crap just because you cant take it when someone is better than you. I'd like to see you go 27-1 just quickscoping if its that easy big shot! Why do you think most of the pro gamers do it? Because its a skill. Even robert bowling has said its not cheap and not down to "game mechanics". So your obviously just a treayarch fan boy who believes everything that JD 2020 tells you because you have no proof of your own.
For **** sake man, seeing as i play PC i think i would know what its like to quickscope on it you complete and utter tool. All your arguments are invalid because they are based on your PREJUDICE and BELIEFS, not FACTS. You just cant deal with the fact that you get beat by quickscopers and have to make up silly excuses for why this is the case. Not all quickscopers are Optic Fanboys, I will agree some of them are, but in my case i certainly am not. I play the objective (which most of the time is TDM) and always come out with a K/D above 1, most likely finishing top so you cant judge me by your poor standards or past experiences.
If your really as good as you think you are than add me on psn and we'll go 1v1 any gun, any map. So for the record dont start an argument with someone that is better than you because at the end of the day the only reason people hate on something is if they cant do it or more to the point, arent good enough to do it. Your just going have to face facts, theres always someone better than you.
First off im not "that guy" that would try to quickscope at knife range on last man on Search and Destroy, unlike some quickscopers i enjoy playing the objective, kills just come as a bonus. So you won't see me doing a 720, claymore cancel, ladder shot on final killcam. And i most certainly am not an "Optic Fanboy" yeah i admire what they do because there amazing at COD but i dont strive to be like them i just enjoy quickscoping.
So it seems to me you think im one of those gimps that shouts "HARDSCOPE" down the mic all the time and constantly goes for stupid kills and ends up on 0-20. You are wrong. For the majority of games i play with the intervention or the barrett. But if im not in the mood ill play with other guns like the SCAR and F2000. For example the other day I went 38-2 on trailer park with a SCAR, then the game after went 27-1 with an intervention on derail, im such a bad player.
I dont know what games you play but most snipers i see use FMJ. If you see an enemy there gonna do one of two things either come at you and shoot or run off. FMJ is used for the second scenario because chances are they'll run behind something or into a building. And your forgetting 40 FMJ kills are needed to unlock extended mags. I got that in 10 games when i prestiged the other day, so dont talk as if you know it all.
You are again mistaken with this notion that hitmarkers are a rare occurence and that your always guaranteed a one hit kill. Why do you think so many people rage about hitmarkers? Because they are a lot more common than you think. Heck i played a private game the other day on miniscule health and still got the occasional hit markers.
Once again will you stop chatting about the aim assist because everyone knows it helps out more so on AR's than it does with sniper rifles, are you just plain stupid or just ridiculously childish and stubborn.
I argue for it for a reason because people like you are always trying to put it down to "taking advantage of game mechanics" and other such bull crap just because you cant take it when someone is better than you. I'd like to see you go 27-1 just quickscoping if its that easy big shot! Why do you think most of the pro gamers do it? Because its a skill. Even robert bowling has said its not cheap and not down to "game mechanics". So your obviously just a treayarch fan boy who believes everything that JD 2020 tells you because you have no proof of your own.
For **** sake man, seeing as i play PC i think i would know what its like to quickscope on it you complete and utter tool. All your arguments are invalid because they are based on your PREJUDICE and BELIEFS, not FACTS. You just cant deal with the fact that you get beat by quickscopers and have to make up silly excuses for why this is the case. Not all quickscopers are Optic Fanboys, I will agree some of them are, but in my case i certainly am not. I play the objective (which most of the time is TDM) and always come out with a K/D above 1, most likely finishing top so you cant judge me by your poor standards or past experiences.
If your really as good as you think you are than add me on psn and we'll go 1v1 any gun, any map. So for the record dont start an argument with someone that is better than you because at the end of the day the only reason people hate on something is if they cant do it or more to the point, arent good enough to do it. Your just going have to face facts, theres always someone better than you.
- I am fully aware I'm being a hypocrite at coming back here to respond.
- One, again with personal insults by calling me stupid or childish eh?
- I ****ing hate Treyarch, don' you dare try to stereotype me as I sold Blops within February because it sucked.
- I will apologize for stereotyping you, however.
- I will not retract my argument about aim-assist since you said absolutely nothing about the mechanics function but repeated on skill and hitmarkers.
- I see more kills than I do Hitmarkers, usually with the almighty SOH and SA.
- What you don't seem to understand is that Quick Scoping is an aim-assist exploit.
- No kidding it helps out AR's, that was it's intended use, to aim with your sights.
- Regarding FMJ, majority of the matches I've been in have used Extended Mags, simple as that.
- Why? Challenge lobbies.
- I never said that FMJ users are small, there are plenty.
- Now, I'm going to address something specifically:
You must have missed the part in my previous post, when I said, I don't care if someone is better than me. I really don't, I bought the game to have fun, and I can indeed have fun even if someone is kicking my ass. Even if you 1 Vs 1 me and kick my ass, what'll that prove? Oh, your better than me, the world is ending and I'm going to cry in a corner. I don't play for statistics, I play for enjoyments. So I really don't care about you going 50-2 or whatever your K/D is. I truly don't. But what concerns me is that your argument is very much fixated on me sucking at this game, or you being better than me.
Originally posted by whitey775
e! If your not good enough to kill a quickscoper with an MP5K then your obviously a bad player or that person is a far better player than you. Dont hate on better players saying "oh yeah what a faggot doing a 360 with a sniper rifle, thats so easy" just because you cant do it.
Originally posted by whitey775
Oh no we have yet another guy whining about "OP shit". I know for a FACT that you most likely use the UMP here and there so you have no leg to stand on. And im sorry but anyone knows you should be able to kill a quickscoper at short range and i refer to my previous statement, if you cant you're a shit player or the other guy is better than you!
So i suggest you pipe down because by looking at the polls you're in a thread with like minded people like me.
I did not start this argument. I posted facts about things you yourself didn't even counter in this or your previous post. I voiced my opinion. And you, for whatever stupid reason, went into a frenzy. It concerns me that you pride yourself to much in this game as well as take it far too seriously if you're going around saying this. What is my problem with it? It shouldn't be in the game in the first place, it never was, and it provides an unbalanced advantage. I stand by my argument of it being an am-assist exploit since you did nothing to convince me otherwise. Call me stupid, or childish. I'm not the one blatantly insulting people because you disagree with them. You can 1 V 1 me, I really don't give a ****. I don't brag about K/D, score, or whatever, but the fact you do says a lot.
The fact that you resorted to some more insults, as well as going with how you perform it, pride yourself in skill, and say nothing to counter me except call me a fanboy in addition to not really providing any evidence except your FMJ theory, shows how far this argument has gone with you. I'm not much better for arguing back and going back on my word, but I refuse to go down to your level.
Good day, last post, done.
08-04-2011, 07:48 PM
#85
Wondoh
Former Staff
Originally posted by IDontbreak
Quickscoping never left, so you cant say its returning.
IW never took it away, treyarch did.
Its like saying PES 2011 are removing the Goalkeepers forever, then making a thread saying The goalkeepers are returning in FIFA 2012.
VERY stupid thread
IW never took it away, treyarch did.
Its like saying PES 2011 are removing the Goalkeepers forever, then making a thread saying The goalkeepers are returning in FIFA 2012.
VERY stupid thread
bad example seeing as PES and FIFA are different series of games created by different people.
Where as Mw2 and black ops are in the same COD series.
and i must point out that you saying "Quickscoping never left, so you cant say its returning.
IW never took it away, treyarch did."
your saying treyarch took it away, so yes i stand corrected in saying it will be returning (in the series).
08-05-2011, 10:59 AM
#88
IDontbreak
Cake is a lie
08-05-2011, 11:57 AM
#89
Wondoh
Former Staff
Originally posted by IDontbreak
WHAT?
Tryarch isnt making MW3 are they?
Pes and Fifa is a good example, its the same genre and its made by different people.
Just like cod.
Stop smoking ffs
Tryarch isnt making MW3 are they?
Pes and Fifa is a good example, its the same genre and its made by different people.
Just like cod.
Stop smoking ffs
No treyarch arent making mw3, well noticed.
but activision is involved with them, just like they were involved in mw2 and black ops.
pes and fifa arent made by the same people where as activision is in black ops and mw2.
love how you ignore the fact you said it went, and it never left, completely contradicting yourself.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
