Post: Who is happy quickscoping is returning?
Options
07-29-2011, 08:26 AM
#1
Wondoh
Former Staff
Let me enlighten you with this thread
For me I thought quickscoping was great on Mw2 and when the game got boring thats all I used to do. Now I play black ops and ive gotten back into using machine guns.
But has quickscoping affected all gamers?
Since quickscoping invaded Mw2 you couldnt snipe without be called a hardscoper. The whole game turned into quickscoping and if you used a machine gun your classed as shitty noob :confused:
This has moved on from Mw2 and also is similar in black ops. If your sniping and you get a final kill you can expect to be called a hardscoper.
Quickscoping has changed the way snipers are portrayed. A sniper is meant to sit somewhere hidden with a great view of the battlefield and pick enemys off. This was how it was originally in COD4 where "true" sniping was.
Now if your using a sniper you have to quickscope otherwise your a noob.
I guess what Im saying is that are you really happy for quickscoping to be brought back?
I know people like optic and faze will be happy but in my opinion quickscoping montages are getting really boring and its the same old thing all the time.
I for one probably would have said yeah im happy with quickscoping returning about a year ago, but now id rather it be gone then in the game. Id rather be able to play my way without having someone call me a noob cos Im not quickscoping. :y:
It may just seem like Im having a rant but I want to hear your views on if you think that its good that quickscoping will return.
The only thing I can hope for is that all the quickscopers use the snipers only game type which is rumoured to be in the game.
The following 4 users say thank you to Wondoh for this useful post:
The following user groaned Wondoh for this awful post:
08-02-2011, 07:06 PM
#75
reddragon3999
Mario!
Originally posted by DC12X
I've done it, Quickscoping is easy, 360 only revolve around the fact you need to know when you stop moving your analog stick. As well, yes, it does lock on bud. Machine guns do it too, but there is something called recoil. The only time Quickscoping takes skill is when you know when the game centers the cross hairs for you. Do I miss? Yes, but I can get a shot in majority of the time. You will automatically snap into the target. Regarding hitmarkers, you should be aware having FMJ has nothing to do with Hitmarkers, because FMJ doesn't increase damage, only bullet penetration. That means the ratio of hitmarkers will be exactly the same. Hitmarkers are the result of incorrect aim, or, aim-assist failing.
As well, I'd much prefer to use a gun how it was intended then use a sniper in the equivalent way of a noobtube. You want to know why 360's are easy and they can kill you? Simple. While rotating, the second, the absolute second[/i] that the crosshairs match up on the enemy, those cross hairs will stick to them, and waa-lah, 360 scope, you aim in their direction, and chances are, aim assist will nudge you right into him and lock-on. That is exactly what quickscoping is.
It is also not my choice for players to use their sniper rifle in the way it wasn't intended and make it OP. It doesn't take much to listen to footsteps in turn around, but if a QS does turn around and you start shooting, you will die. And to be frank, whether I'm here to be good or suck at the game is not in my argument, I'm here to have fun, and OP shit ruins it. But I will tell you right now, I am mildly decent considering I can use all range of weapons efficiently. So please stop being ignorant ad trying to make up your own facts, everything from the word Legging-It is essentially invalid.
And here's another thing, if someone where to turn around and shoot rather than any other gun rather than Quickscoping, they'd die. They would die. But the fact that a sniper rifle abuses the broken aim assist provides that benefit for a near-instant kill, supporting my statement further of being OP. If you think you've been Quickscoping this entire time based on aiming skills, you're insane. I'd challenge you to do it on the PC version, where I'm fine with and actually needs skill.
The hitboxes that exist in MW2 don't help Quickscoping either, an makes it even easier. So while trying to throw in petty insults at me, you'd best reconsider the argument. If you disagree with me, it's fine. If you're going to try to go toe and toe with me at a debate, you better already have all the facts you need.
Better yet, do this. Go into a Hardcore game and see how easy it is to Quickscope your teammate and come back.
As well, I'd much prefer to use a gun how it was intended then use a sniper in the equivalent way of a noobtube. You want to know why 360's are easy and they can kill you? Simple. While rotating, the second, the absolute second[/i] that the crosshairs match up on the enemy, those cross hairs will stick to them, and waa-lah, 360 scope, you aim in their direction, and chances are, aim assist will nudge you right into him and lock-on. That is exactly what quickscoping is.
It is also not my choice for players to use their sniper rifle in the way it wasn't intended and make it OP. It doesn't take much to listen to footsteps in turn around, but if a QS does turn around and you start shooting, you will die. And to be frank, whether I'm here to be good or suck at the game is not in my argument, I'm here to have fun, and OP shit ruins it. But I will tell you right now, I am mildly decent considering I can use all range of weapons efficiently. So please stop being ignorant ad trying to make up your own facts, everything from the word Legging-It is essentially invalid.
And here's another thing, if someone where to turn around and shoot rather than any other gun rather than Quickscoping, they'd die. They would die. But the fact that a sniper rifle abuses the broken aim assist provides that benefit for a near-instant kill, supporting my statement further of being OP. If you think you've been Quickscoping this entire time based on aiming skills, you're insane. I'd challenge you to do it on the PC version, where I'm fine with and actually needs skill.
The hitboxes that exist in MW2 don't help Quickscoping either, an makes it even easier. So while trying to throw in petty insults at me, you'd best reconsider the argument. If you disagree with me, it's fine. If you're going to try to go toe and toe with me at a debate, you better already have all the facts you need.
Better yet, do this. Go into a Hardcore game and see how easy it is to Quickscope your teammate and come back.
i agree with you completely. i would love to see people quick scope after they turn off aim assist in there game settings.
The following user thanked reddragon3999 for this useful post:
08-03-2011, 12:38 PM
#77
whitey775
Pokemon Trainer
Originally posted by DC12X
I've done it, Quickscoping is easy, 360 only revolve around the fact you need to know when you stop moving your analog stick. As well, yes, it does lock on bud. Machine guns do it too, but there is something called recoil. The only time Quickscoping takes skill is when you know when the game centers the cross hairs for you. Do I miss? Yes, but I can get a shot in majority of the time. You will automatically snap into the target. Regarding hitmarkers, you should be aware having FMJ has nothing to do with Hitmarkers, because FMJ doesn't increase damage, only bullet penetration. That means the ratio of hitmarkers will be exactly the same. Hitmarkers are the result of incorrect aim, or, aim-assist failing.
As well, I'd much prefer to use a gun how it was intended then use a sniper in the equivalent way of a noobtube. You want to know why 360's are easy and they can kill you? Simple. While rotating, the second, the absolute second[/i] that the crosshairs match up on the enemy, those cross hairs will stick to them, and waa-lah, 360 scope, you aim in their direction, and chances are, aim assist will nudge you right into him and lock-on. That is exactly what quickscoping is.
It is also not my choice for players to use their sniper rifle in the way it wasn't intended and make it OP. It doesn't take much to listen to footsteps in turn around, but if a QS does turn around and you start shooting, you will die. And to be frank, whether I'm here to be good or suck at the game is not in my argument, I'm here to have fun, and OP shit ruins it. But I will tell you right now, I am mildly decent considering I can use all range of weapons efficiently. So please stop being ignorant ad trying to make up your own facts, everything from the word Legging-It is essentially invalid.
And here's another thing, if someone where to turn around and shoot rather than any other gun rather than Quickscoping, they'd die. They would die. But the fact that a sniper rifle abuses the broken aim assist provides that benefit for a near-instant kill, supporting my statement further of being OP. If you think you've been Quickscoping this entire time based on aiming skills, you're insane. I'd challenge you to do it on the PC version, where I'm fine with and actually needs skill.
The hitboxes that exist in MW2 don't help Quickscoping either, an makes it even easier. So while trying to throw in petty insults at me, you'd best reconsider the argument. If you disagree with me, it's fine. If you're going to try to go toe and toe with me at a debate, you better already have all the facts you need.
Better yet, do this. Go into a Hardcore game and see how easy it is to Quickscope your teammate and come back.
As well, I'd much prefer to use a gun how it was intended then use a sniper in the equivalent way of a noobtube. You want to know why 360's are easy and they can kill you? Simple. While rotating, the second, the absolute second[/i] that the crosshairs match up on the enemy, those cross hairs will stick to them, and waa-lah, 360 scope, you aim in their direction, and chances are, aim assist will nudge you right into him and lock-on. That is exactly what quickscoping is.
It is also not my choice for players to use their sniper rifle in the way it wasn't intended and make it OP. It doesn't take much to listen to footsteps in turn around, but if a QS does turn around and you start shooting, you will die. And to be frank, whether I'm here to be good or suck at the game is not in my argument, I'm here to have fun, and OP shit ruins it. But I will tell you right now, I am mildly decent considering I can use all range of weapons efficiently. So please stop being ignorant ad trying to make up your own facts, everything from the word Legging-It is essentially invalid.
And here's another thing, if someone where to turn around and shoot rather than any other gun rather than Quickscoping, they'd die. They would die. But the fact that a sniper rifle abuses the broken aim assist provides that benefit for a near-instant kill, supporting my statement further of being OP. If you think you've been Quickscoping this entire time based on aiming skills, you're insane. I'd challenge you to do it on the PC version, where I'm fine with and actually needs skill.
The hitboxes that exist in MW2 don't help Quickscoping either, an makes it even easier. So while trying to throw in petty insults at me, you'd best reconsider the argument. If you disagree with me, it's fine. If you're going to try to go toe and toe with me at a debate, you better already have all the facts you need.
Better yet, do this. Go into a Hardcore game and see how easy it is to Quickscope your teammate and come back.
Thats the whole point of a 360 you've got to know when to stop thats the hard part, so you can't just go saying its easy. Yeah you may find quickscoping easy in a private match with you and your mate messing about, but try doing it online on every level then come back and chat shit to me.
And according to you if i were to zoom in near a target at any distance my crosshairs would instantly lock onto it? No i dont think that is true, so stop trying to exaggerate it. In regard to FMJ i was indeed on about bullet penetration because i know it doesnt increase bullet damage, but a lot of the time your shooting through objects without even realising especially when using a machine gun, so FMJ does effect hitmarkers. And hitmarkers are nothing to do with aim assist failing its to do with where you hit the target and what multiplier that area has on it.
If quickscoping was as easy as 360'in and knowing you were always going to get a kill like your saying, why doesnt everyone do it? Because yet again your chatting bull! Aim assist helps when your near a target, with a sniper rifle you have to be a lot nearer a target for it to lock in than you do with a machine gun. Therefore the skill behind quickscoping is making sure your target is lined up in a pinpoint accurate part of your scope, not generally lining someone up and spraying, like with a machine gun. Which one is more skilled... easy answer.
Oh no we have yet another guy whining about "OP shit". I know for a FACT that you most likely use the UMP here and there so you have no leg to stand on. And im sorry but anyone knows you should be able to kill a quickscoper at short range and i refer to my previous statement, if you cant you're a shit player or the other guy is better than you!
And for your information i do play PC as well as playstation and own games such as: Counter Strike, Age of Mythology, COD4 and MW2. I quickscope on there as well, which i will admit is slightly harder but i still manage to go positive ratio. But more of my friends play playstation than PC.
So i suggest you pipe down because by looking at the polls you're in a thread with like minded people like me.
And another thing. I dont think grammar is your strong point, might want to brush up on that, because half of the time you make no sense.
08-03-2011, 04:04 PM
#78
DC12X
S.P.E.C.I.A.L
Originally posted by whitey775
Thats the whole point of a 360 you've got to know when to stop thats the hard part, so you can't just go saying its easy. Yeah you may find quickscoping easy in a private match with you and your mate messing about, but try doing it online on every level then come back and chat shit to me.
And according to you if i were to zoom in near a target at any distance my crosshairs would instantly lock onto it? No i dont think that is true, so stop trying to exaggerate it. In regard to FMJ i was indeed on about bullet penetration because i know it doesnt increase bullet damage, but a lot of the time your shooting through objects without even realising especially when using a machine gun, so FMJ does effect hitmarkers. And hitmarkers are nothing to do with aim assist failing its to do with where you hit the target and what multiplier that area has on it.
If quickscoping was as easy as 360'in and knowing you were always going to get a kill like your saying, why doesnt everyone do it? Because yet again your chatting bull! Aim assist helps when your near a target, with a sniper rifle you have to be a lot nearer a target for it to lock in than you do with a machine gun. Therefore the skill behind quickscoping is making sure your target is lined up in a pinpoint accurate part of your scope, not generally lining someone up and spraying, like with a machine gun. Which one is more skilled... easy answer.
Oh no we have yet another guy whining about "OP shit". I know for a FACT that you most likely use the UMP here and there so you have no leg to stand on. And im sorry but anyone knows you should be able to kill a quickscoper at short range and i refer to my previous statement, if you cant you're a shit player or the other guy is better than you!
And for your information i do play PC as well as playstation and own games such as: Counter Strike, Age of Mythology, COD4 and MW2. I quickscope on there as well, which i will admit is slightly harder but i still manage to go positive ratio. But more of my friends play playstation than PC.
So i suggest you pipe down because by looking at the polls you're in a thread with like minded people like me.
And another thing. I dont think grammar is your strong point, might want to brush up on that, because half of the time you make no sense.
And according to you if i were to zoom in near a target at any distance my crosshairs would instantly lock onto it? No i dont think that is true, so stop trying to exaggerate it. In regard to FMJ i was indeed on about bullet penetration because i know it doesnt increase bullet damage, but a lot of the time your shooting through objects without even realising especially when using a machine gun, so FMJ does effect hitmarkers. And hitmarkers are nothing to do with aim assist failing its to do with where you hit the target and what multiplier that area has on it.
If quickscoping was as easy as 360'in and knowing you were always going to get a kill like your saying, why doesnt everyone do it? Because yet again your chatting bull! Aim assist helps when your near a target, with a sniper rifle you have to be a lot nearer a target for it to lock in than you do with a machine gun. Therefore the skill behind quickscoping is making sure your target is lined up in a pinpoint accurate part of your scope, not generally lining someone up and spraying, like with a machine gun. Which one is more skilled... easy answer.
Oh no we have yet another guy whining about "OP shit". I know for a FACT that you most likely use the UMP here and there so you have no leg to stand on. And im sorry but anyone knows you should be able to kill a quickscoper at short range and i refer to my previous statement, if you cant you're a shit player or the other guy is better than you!
And for your information i do play PC as well as playstation and own games such as: Counter Strike, Age of Mythology, COD4 and MW2. I quickscope on there as well, which i will admit is slightly harder but i still manage to go positive ratio. But more of my friends play playstation than PC.
So i suggest you pipe down because by looking at the polls you're in a thread with like minded people like me.
And another thing. I dont think grammar is your strong point, might want to brush up on that, because half of the time you make no sense.
First of all, I'll address this right now English is not my first language, nor is it my third. I also find i ironic there were others who understood me perfectly. I'm finding it ****ing ridiculous that the reason I'm replying to all of this is because you couldn't take in my opinion, instead, what did you do? You're blatantly extremely defensive and narrow-minded on here. So while your throwing your petty insults, realize this: I don't give a damn if the majority of the people in this thread support Quickscoping because of the fact It's a poll. I can tell when someone is being debating because of a disagreement, and I can tell when someone is being overly defensive for some stupid reason. You know exactly what category your on. I was fine with this until that last post because clearly you have no idea how it works.
And this is one extra perk I hate, is you guys going in a damn Online Public Match. You're the kind of guy who will look right at someone instead of Search and Destroy, and instead of knifing them like a logical person, you try to Quickscope. And you end up getting killed. That, or, you don't try and complete the objective, just help yourself to some kills.
And in reality, it doesn't take much to realize when you stop rotating. Which is the reason you have adjustable sensitivity to help you out.
I'll repeat my statement about aim-assist failing. Because of those big ass hit boxes, chances are you will always get a instant-kill whether it be body or head. Aim-Assist didn't go into the right location that a Sniper typically takes you. If you Snipe with a Sniper Rifle, when you look at the enemy, it will almost always be right near his upper body. And almost all the time, as I know this for a fact, you are not trying to shoot through an object with Quickscoping. Very rarely does that happen. Almost all the time you will follow that person and Quickscope them from there. I see more Extended Mags than I do FMJ.
Chatting Bull? I don't respect your opinion anymore since your falling out of reasons. Why doesn't everyone do it? Well, on a Public Match, people aren't ****ing stupid to pull that shit. It takes for you to get to know the best sensitivity for you, and time. That's literally all it is. People aren't throwing away a free kill and possibly dying to look like a Optic Fanboy like you. In addition, Aim-Assist makes you Stick to the target. I hate it. You know how many times I've attacked someone, and a teammate passes by, and my sight literally gets dragged away onto him? It sticks. To say it doesn't is absolutely absurd. Go into any match a Public or Private match. And look at your opponent. Your sight will be on him and centered on him. Look at him, and see how it slows down on him. It's bad enough that Aim-Assist already lines it up for you.
I can tell your not someone with a legitimate opinion anymore but now pulling facts straight out of your ass. Probably because I don't like UMP for being horrific in Short Range compared to a MP5K. So instead of being an ignoramus, yet again, do some homework. I ****ing hate UMP's. And I hate people like you who try to defend it in every way possible and knowingly try to change the argument like you did right now. Well that argument instantly invalid. I use MP5K, Uzi, And AR's. Case closed with that. So as I said before, QS is overpowered, and cheap. All my statements will continue to stand because you have done nothing but make my case stronger.
Also, your statement about playing on PC has no credibility simply because it has no evidence. Because anyone would know Quickscoping is not slightly harder on PC. It is Much more harder.
In conclusion, I'm done with this stupid argument. It was caused when someone spoke their mind, and then someone cried about it. If you respond, good luck. Chances are I won't seeing as I've wasted unnecessary time typing this up in response to someone who thinks I care if I suck at the game or not; just another fanboy. I could give two shits, because as I've said, I'm here to play and have fun, as is many others online, not some "xXOpTiCzZ_D3$troYeRXx". So instead of trying to make me cry by saying I suck, grow the hell up. Good day to you.
08-04-2011, 01:08 AM
#80
Anyone who quickscopes in public matches is a faggot, unless you're REALLY REALLY good and can actually help out. I quickscope in private matches and I'd say I'm fairly good at it but taking it online would just be STUPID if anyone on the other team is using anything other than a sniper rifle. With that being said I love quickscopers on the enemy team because they help me out with killstreaks and whatnot :y:
08-04-2011, 12:16 PM
#81
IDontbreak
Cake is a lie
The following user groaned IDontbreak for this awful post:
08-04-2011, 12:45 PM
#82
whitey775
Pokemon Trainer
Originally posted by DC12X
First of all, I'll address this right now English is not my first language, nor is it my third. I also find i ironic there were others who understood me perfectly. I'm finding it ****ing ridiculous that the reason I'm replying to all of this is because you couldn't take in my opinion, instead, what did you do? You're blatantly extremely defensive and narrow-minded on here. So while your throwing your petty insults, realize this: I don't give a damn if the majority of the people in this thread support Quickscoping because of the fact It's a poll. I can tell when someone is being debating because of a disagreement, and I can tell when someone is being overly defensive for some stupid reason. You know exactly what category your on. I was fine with this until that last post because clearly you have no idea how it works.
And this is one extra perk I hate, is you guys going in a damn Online Public Match. You're the kind of guy who will look right at someone instead of Search and Destroy, and instead of knifing them like a logical person, you try to Quickscope. And you end up getting killed. That, or, you don't try and complete the objective, just help yourself to some kills.
And in reality, it doesn't take much to realize when you stop rotating. Which is the reason you have adjustable sensitivity to help you out.
I'll repeat my statement about aim-assist failing. Because of those big ass hit boxes, chances are you will always get a instant-kill whether it be body or head. Aim-Assist didn't go into the right location that a Sniper typically takes you. If you Snipe with a Sniper Rifle, when you look at the enemy, it will almost always be right near his upper body. And almost all the time, as I know this for a fact, you are not trying to shoot through an object with Quickscoping. Very rarely does that happen. Almost all the time you will follow that person and Quickscope them from there. I see more Extended Mags than I do FMJ.
Chatting Bull? I don't respect your opinion anymore since your falling out of reasons. Why doesn't everyone do it? Well, on a Public Match, people aren't ****ing stupid to pull that shit. It takes for you to get to know the best sensitivity for you, and time. That's literally all it is. People aren't throwing away a free kill and possibly dying to look like a Optic Fanboy like you. In addition, Aim-Assist makes you Stick to the target. I hate it. You know how many times I've attacked someone, and a teammate passes by, and my sight literally gets dragged away onto him? It sticks. To say it doesn't is absolutely absurd. Go into any match a Public or Private match. And look at your opponent. Your sight will be on him and centered on him. Look at him, and see how it slows down on him. It's bad enough that Aim-Assist already lines it up for you.
I can tell your not someone with a legitimate opinion anymore but now pulling facts straight out of your ass. Probably because I don't like UMP for being horrific in Short Range compared to a MP5K. So instead of being an ignoramus, yet again, do some homework. I ****ing hate UMP's. And I hate people like you who try to defend it in every way possible and knowingly try to change the argument like you did right now. Well that argument instantly invalid. I use MP5K, Uzi, And AR's. Case closed with that. So as I said before, QS is overpowered, and cheap. All my statements will continue to stand because you have done nothing but make my case stronger.
Also, your statement about playing on PC has no credibility simply because it has no evidence. Because anyone would know Quickscoping is not slightly harder on PC. It is Much more harder.
In conclusion, I'm done with this stupid argument. It was caused when someone spoke their mind, and then someone cried about it. If you respond, good luck. Chances are I won't seeing as I've wasted unnecessary time typing this up in response to someone who thinks I care if I suck at the game or not; just another fanboy. I could give two shits, because as I've said, I'm here to play and have fun, as is many others online, not some "xXOpTiCzZ_D3$troYeRXx". So instead of trying to make me cry by saying I suck, grow the hell up. Good day to you.
And this is one extra perk I hate, is you guys going in a damn Online Public Match. You're the kind of guy who will look right at someone instead of Search and Destroy, and instead of knifing them like a logical person, you try to Quickscope. And you end up getting killed. That, or, you don't try and complete the objective, just help yourself to some kills.
And in reality, it doesn't take much to realize when you stop rotating. Which is the reason you have adjustable sensitivity to help you out.
I'll repeat my statement about aim-assist failing. Because of those big ass hit boxes, chances are you will always get a instant-kill whether it be body or head. Aim-Assist didn't go into the right location that a Sniper typically takes you. If you Snipe with a Sniper Rifle, when you look at the enemy, it will almost always be right near his upper body. And almost all the time, as I know this for a fact, you are not trying to shoot through an object with Quickscoping. Very rarely does that happen. Almost all the time you will follow that person and Quickscope them from there. I see more Extended Mags than I do FMJ.
Chatting Bull? I don't respect your opinion anymore since your falling out of reasons. Why doesn't everyone do it? Well, on a Public Match, people aren't ****ing stupid to pull that shit. It takes for you to get to know the best sensitivity for you, and time. That's literally all it is. People aren't throwing away a free kill and possibly dying to look like a Optic Fanboy like you. In addition, Aim-Assist makes you Stick to the target. I hate it. You know how many times I've attacked someone, and a teammate passes by, and my sight literally gets dragged away onto him? It sticks. To say it doesn't is absolutely absurd. Go into any match a Public or Private match. And look at your opponent. Your sight will be on him and centered on him. Look at him, and see how it slows down on him. It's bad enough that Aim-Assist already lines it up for you.
I can tell your not someone with a legitimate opinion anymore but now pulling facts straight out of your ass. Probably because I don't like UMP for being horrific in Short Range compared to a MP5K. So instead of being an ignoramus, yet again, do some homework. I ****ing hate UMP's. And I hate people like you who try to defend it in every way possible and knowingly try to change the argument like you did right now. Well that argument instantly invalid. I use MP5K, Uzi, And AR's. Case closed with that. So as I said before, QS is overpowered, and cheap. All my statements will continue to stand because you have done nothing but make my case stronger.
Also, your statement about playing on PC has no credibility simply because it has no evidence. Because anyone would know Quickscoping is not slightly harder on PC. It is Much more harder.
In conclusion, I'm done with this stupid argument. It was caused when someone spoke their mind, and then someone cried about it. If you respond, good luck. Chances are I won't seeing as I've wasted unnecessary time typing this up in response to someone who thinks I care if I suck at the game or not; just another fanboy. I could give two shits, because as I've said, I'm here to play and have fun, as is many others online, not some "xXOpTiCzZ_D3$troYeRXx". So instead of trying to make me cry by saying I suck, grow the hell up. Good day to you.
Fair enough for writing all of this if its not your first language. For that i apologise.
First off im not "that guy" that would try to quickscope at knife range on last man on Search and Destroy, unlike some quickscopers i enjoy playing the objective, kills just come as a bonus. So you won't see me doing a 720, claymore cancel, ladder shot on final killcam. And i most certainly am not an "Optic Fanboy" yeah i admire what they do because there amazing at COD but i dont strive to be like them i just enjoy quickscoping.
So it seems to me you think im one of those gimps that shouts "HARDSCOPE" down the mic all the time and constantly goes for stupid kills and ends up on 0-20. You are wrong. For the majority of games i play with the intervention or the barrett. But if im not in the mood ill play with other guns like the SCAR and F2000. For example the other day I went 38-2 on trailer park with a SCAR, then the game after went 27-1 with an intervention on derail, im such a bad player.
I dont know what games you play but most snipers i see use FMJ. If you see an enemy there gonna do one of two things either come at you and shoot or run off. FMJ is used for the second scenario because chances are they'll run behind something or into a building. And your forgetting 40 FMJ kills are needed to unlock extended mags. I got that in 10 games when i prestiged the other day, so dont talk as if you know it all.
You are again mistaken with this notion that hitmarkers are a rare occurence and that your always guaranteed a one hit kill. Why do you think so many people rage about hitmarkers? Because they are a lot more common than you think. Heck i played a private game the other day on miniscule health and still got the occasional hit markers.
Once again will you stop chatting about the aim assist because everyone knows it helps out more so on AR's than it does with sniper rifles, are you just plain stupid or just ridiculously childish and stubborn.
I argue for it for a reason because people like you are always trying to put it down to "taking advantage of game mechanics" and other such bull crap just because you cant take it when someone is better than you. I'd like to see you go 27-1 just quickscoping if its that easy big shot! Why do you think most of the pro gamers do it? Because its a skill. Even robert bowling has said its not cheap and not down to "game mechanics". So your obviously just a treayarch fan boy who believes everything that JD 2020 tells you because you have no proof of your own.
For **** sake man, seeing as i play PC i think i would know what its like to quickscope on it you complete and utter tool. All your arguments are invalid because they are based on your PREJUDICE and BELIEFS, not FACTS. You just cant deal with the fact that you get beat by quickscopers and have to make up silly excuses for why this is the case. Not all quickscopers are Optic Fanboys, I will agree some of them are, but in my case i certainly am not. I play the objective (which most of the time is TDM) and always come out with a K/D above 1, most likely finishing top so you cant judge me by your poor standards or past experiences.
If your really as good as you think you are than add me on psn and we'll go 1v1 any gun, any map. So for the record dont start an argument with someone that is better than you because at the end of the day the only reason people hate on something is if they cant do it or more to the point, arent good enough to do it. Your just going have to face facts, theres always someone better than you.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
