Post: Modern Warfare 3 is not a copy of Modern Warfare 2
10-17-2011, 08:29 PM #1
Pedo Leader
I’m too L33T
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); You must login or register to view this content.

Many fans, or ex-fans should we say, are easy to critique Modern Warfare 3's similarities (based off of the gameplay videos they've seen, that is) with Modern Warfare 2. "Can't wait for the Modern Warfare 2 expansion!" and "I'm not paying $60 for another Modern Warfare 2!" are two of many quotes stated by upset fans. However, Glen Schofield, Sledgehammer Games' general manager, feels this couldn't be further from the truth.

In a recent interview with CVG, Schofield explains his certainty, as to what distinguishable factors are included in Modern Warfare 3. "If you put Modern Warfare 2 next to Modern Warfare 3 you would see a huge difference," Schofield said. "Look at all the character models, look at all the gun models, look at the reflections, look at the water. There is so much that we've added, so when someone says 'cut and paste', I don't even want to talk to them because they don't know. They just don't know. They have no idea."

You must login or register to view this content.

Clearly, he's indicated that there's difference with the graphics, but fans also feel the gameplay is far too similar for Modern Warfare 3 to be labelled "a new game". Schofield continues to give his verdict on the new engine they used to develop the graphics. His analogy being "this thing is Porsche."

"I've worked on a lot of engines over my lifetime and spent a lot of time putting graphics in to them and this thing is Porsche," he said, "and what I mean by that is that it is stream-lined, everything in it is perfectly freaking clean. You can tell it's been worked on for years. It's easy to upgrade."

"On top of that you have what we added to the audio engine. Then there's a lot of stuff under the hood. People don't think about this but when you make your tools better and you can iterate twice as many times, you make the game better."

You must login or register to view this content.


The mentioning of a public Beta for Modern Warfare 3 occurred during the interview with Schofield. He stated that there was so much work to do, he didn't know whether a beta crossed anyone's mind. With that in mind he felt the Call of Duty: XP event sufficed.

"We had XP and XP was in itself a way for 1,000s of people to play the game and for us to look over their shoulder and see how they were doing and how they liked it and that was really good."

If you would like to read the full interview, You must login or register to view this content.

For my own verdict, I'm perfectly content with the ways Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games have stylised Modern Warfare 3. The graphics for Modern Warfare 2 were great, and the overall gameplay was more than satisfactory. I have no problems with Modern Warfare 3 being similar to Modern Warfare 2, considering it's a sequel after all. We'll have to wait until November 8th to find out more!

You must login or register to view this content.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 2 users say thank you to Pedo Leader for this useful post:

MythGavin,
10-17-2011, 08:44 PM #2
To the "untrained eye" it looks like Modern Warfare 2 but we all know that the quality will be much better than in modern warfare 2 Smile .

The following user thanked Weescotty for this useful post:

IRAQ
10-17-2011, 08:52 PM #3
We all know modern warfare 2 was a beta for modern warfare 3

The following 4 users say thank you to iCopy for this useful post:

amplif1er, Fire., Mr.Deagle, MythGavin
10-17-2011, 10:18 PM #4
amplif1er
Why are you reading this?
Originally posted by icopy View Post
we all know modern warfare 2 was a beta for modern warfare 3
:carling: .
10-17-2011, 10:49 PM #5
Number
Banned
I've heard that MW3 uses the same game engine as MW2.
10-17-2011, 11:07 PM #6
Pimp
Rustler Of Jimmies
personally i see mw3 the same as all cods
i am not hating , hell i payed an extra 100$ to get the game early
A. Survival mode is based on the ideals of the mission body count on spec ops
B. 1/4 of players are going to be quickscoping / going for clips 2/4 are going to do exploit the game . So i mean 75% of players seem to be into that shit.
C. Same career mode , this is true a classic "chase the bad guy"
D Same multiplayer prestiges , nothing to fancy
E. Most people are going to kill whore
So i mean i am going to enjoy this game , have fun with my boys (Aezo , Alpha , legal , SG , screw, etc) . However , it seems like there transferring the same game with a different design.

An analogy would be a sheet paper , if i get a paper and fold it in half . It may look cooler but its still paper.
10-17-2011, 11:24 PM #7
Assassin
Easter Egg!
just as long as it keeps me entertained then its all good. im not really into this whole "mw3 is mw2 2.5" if you wanna be that geek who does that then you do it.
10-18-2011, 12:50 AM #8
HiiddenDespaiir
The Beast of NGU
I couldn't agree more. The changes are much more different.


Originally posted by amplif1er View Post
:carling: .


Nice Sig.
10-18-2011, 01:19 AM #9
Problem?
I defeated!
does it matter, everyone who plays the cod series is gonna buy it sooner or later.
10-18-2011, 03:16 AM #10
I was at CoD XP and I can say for certain, it is VERY different from MW2. I like how the guy a few posts above me put it. "MW2 as a beta of MW3"

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo