(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I recently have trying out the Type 95, and noticed that the gun is horrible. It seems to take at least 3 shots to take someone out. One time I shot someone from about mid range head shot because his head was the only thing sticking out and I had to shoot him 3 times before he died. Not sure if it was me but one of my friends said the same thing.

Lol I picked up type-95 today and its the same to me, one burst kill usually.

Not saying every gun should be exactly the same, but when one gun is getting one burst kills where other guns are taking 4-6 shots to kill, that just seems a bit... Unbalanced. Not to mention that landing all 3 shots from one burst of a type 95 is far easier than landing 6 consecutive shots of a UMP.

Its not about the damage, its about how long it takes to kill, and the type 95 bests most other guns at most ranges.

I've notice no change whatsoever. It's just you.

I can't think of more mature response than...So what.

The MK14 is a stronger weapon. It has more damage and is a two hit kill at most ranges and can be a one hit kill at close range. Reason you're not complaining about that is mostly because less people use that gun. Also if the Type 95 was as good as you'd like to believe everybody would use it including yourself. I've begun using the MK14 and will actually make a thread eventually about my progress. However, the Type 95 isn't the strongest gun in it's class. It's high risk, high reward. Same way that up close to medium a MP7 with or without rapid fire is little risk with actually less reward. It's a common thing here that when people don't like a gun, they tend to call it overpowered and complain about it. I hate getting killed by that damn Striker but I could care less if it's OP since it has disadvantages and the more OP weapons we have, the less OP weapons we have.

The Type 95 may be easier to land 3 shots with than 6 with UMP, I will agree. However, if you miss with those 3 shots the UMP will kill. The one burst range of the Type 95 is at close range.

I don't think guns need to be balanced, rather just have advantages and disadvantages. With a good connection and on bigger maps a Type 95 is beast. On smaller maps, having an SMG that you can spray with especially from the hip is beast. Try out the MK14 and you'll see the only thing Type 95 has over it is not having to worry about mashing the trigger quicker and lower mags.

Other guns have their pros and cons at certain ranges, such as the MP7 like you said. The thing about the type 95 is that it is just as powerful at most ranges. Where most of the other guns' damage has already dropped off, the type 95 is still getting one burst kills.

The MK14 is very powerful, and you're right, I don't see many people using it. But in the time it takes to shoot one bullet of the MK14, which is only lethal if it is a headshot, the type 95 would already have gotten the kill. Again, it's not about the strength/damage of the gun, it's about the time to kill, and the type 95 consistently outclasses every other gun at most ranges, with the exception of shotguns and snipers, but those are balanced as they have major disadvantages. The type 95 has no disadvantage.

The gun itself doesn't annoy me, I'm fine with people using it most of the time, I use it sometimes. What annoys me is that it is overused due to its ease of use, and some people use it purely because they can't compete with other guns. I just think the dropoff distance should be reduced slightly, in order to be more balanced with the other guns.

my favorite gun ... :lol:

Yea not as strong as before but....still my type of gun choice.

Well i had a a game with it just a moment ago it was good 32 kills 16 deaths... maybe its your connection test it in private match with ur friend and see how many bullets it take to kill

The Type 95 has no disadvantage??? LMAO. So you're telling me I can rush around a small map with Type 95 like I could with an SMG,Shotgun or FAD, ACR, Scar? Also you're telling me you see T95 more than ACR,PP90M1 and MP7????

The Type 95 isn't any easier to use than the ACR. Burst weapons can't be sprayed the way fully autos can so that's one disadvantage. Also bust weapons are severely hurt by bad connections which MW3 has become known for.

Also why are you so concerned with how quick a gun kills as if that is the only factor in how effective a gun is? Most bolt action sniper rifles will kill a target quicker(1 bullet) than other guns but that ignores other factors.

A bolt action rilfe user vs a MP7 user for example. The Bolt action will kill quicker IF AND ONLY IF that shot is on target. The MP7 can fire faster thus meaning unless the sniper is quick on the draw the MP7 user has a chance.

You're making the T95 out to be like the FAMAS from BO. That would be an example of no disadvantage.

The T95 is unrealiable at close range, is connection based and the M16 and MK14 actually have less damage drop off. The only range the T95 is beastly is at medium range. Which again takes a good aim. I'm not saying the gun isn't great but to act as if that gun is so easy yet PP90,ACR and MP7 is so much more challengng is false.