(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Seriosly its stupid if you choice to snipe you should snip not have a mini SMG up your arse that ypu pull out when ever a guy is near, same withshotguns carnt make the shot pull out a mini smg and shoot with that secondaries = BS

It would be a lot more realistic with just a handgun, but COD isn't realistic and it just keeps getting further from being realistic as the game moves on

First of all smg's are not secondaries (unless they use Overkill). Also the only secondaries I would call bull would be the machine pistols akimbos. Just an observation of mine but I think your only mad because you've died by a sniper because you didn't expect him to use a smg and therefore probably didn't take him seriously. (That may be a bit confusing but I can reword it if you want :y

Secondaries are in the game because they make a broader game (if that makes sense)

Bro... You're a very good player... However,everytime something kills you or prevents you from getting a kill you can't make a thread asking for something to be removed.

"Assassin needs to be nerfed,knifes, you hate secondaries,Support" are all things you have mentioned. Respawn and move on. You have 40+ MOABS like what do you want?

I have a guy in my clan who you remind me of. He ragequits a lot and will moan and groan after EVERY death. Every death is bullshit. He was 27-11 the other day and backed out. The three games before he probably went 120-25... He had ONE "subpar" game of less than 3kdr and backed out.

Support is a bigger issue. If a guy wants to troll and go 10-30 quick scoping, he should not get rewarded with Stealth Bombers because he has enoug points. If you put yourself at disadvantage with shotgun or sniper you should have to earn a killstreak. It was so rewarding to get dogs in Black Ops while using an L96. This game,scrubs think they are quick scopers and get rewarded regardless... Secondaries are fine. Most pick up a gun off the ground anyway.. Not to mention launchers are ********.

At first, seeing the thread title, I thought "What a stupid question". But then, I realised that from COD4's Handguns, we've now got MW3's Handguns and Machine Pistols, Launchers are an exception as I feel we need them (not RPG's ) so we can shoot down air support. But Machine Pistols? Why do we have them, if they only had the Silencer, Red Dot, Holographic and Ext. Mags, they'd be fine, but why put Akimbo in?

Anyway.. Rant over.

Akimbos make just as much since. It's not a stretch to think someone could have a pistol in both hands. You should be happy I don't make the games. I'd have shotgun secondaries back...

To op
I'm already at a disadvantage with my sniper so why shouldn't I be able to take out a gun to level the playing field?
Sure I could try to qs but if I miss then you just spray me down
Machine pistols are there for balance

My shotgun usually kills slower than machine pistols, im fine with handguns though.

The only secondaries that should be available are pistols and a knife. No bs full-auto micro smgs that can be akimbo'd. It's hilarious to see people even try and defend them when you see people with akimbo fmgs racking up more kills than someone using their primary.

secondary is good but making them smgs is not good i mean fmg9 with scavenger and akimbo is so good u can get a moab with it,IW is very stupid (justsayin)