Originally posted by xd366
here you go:
You must login or register to view this content.
theyre not that hard to take down you know..
yeahs that good for 2 shoots, or 1 flare and one hit, or 2 hits so you carnt take down a helicopter, pavelow, uav, etc all in one life....
---------- Post added at 07:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 PM ----------
Originally posted by chugs
there was never gun vs gun in cod they always had certain killstreak to go for
COD2, COD4 was not nearly as bad, on COD4 a 7 killstreak was hard. aswell it was more easier to avoid them...
---------- Post added at 07:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 PM ----------
Originally posted by Justice
That would be boring. They make modes without killstreaks.
People will camp regardless. There is nothing illegal or immoral about doing so and the amount people actually camp in COD is exaggerated. I prefer to rush more since legit camping doesn't get you many kills unless the enemy team is full if revenge killers. I have little issues killing campers and if I did I would find a new lobby or outcamp them worst case.
It:s a catch 22. We complain about campers yet when people rsh with SMGs or fmgs we complain the weapons are too good.
No killstreaks would just make people complain about gun imbalance more.
its less about stopping campers than making it more player driven, i l know no kill streaks would get boring hence the fact i wanted specialist so you still get rewarded for doing good and going on kill spree,you out of the action.
i like to earn kill streaks they make you feel good and get rewards, they could maybe keep in the MOAB so that's something to go for i don't know but i do think the whole it by a predator that can't be avoided and kills the guy who's helping the team