(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
IMO, I think that they are both good or "OP" guns but I personally like the ACOG Dragunov better because of higher fire rate and just the feel of a sniper that you can spray w/out having a problem of cocking your gun against someone.
You can spray w/ a barret but the recoil sucks lol. (While aiming)
Which one do you guys is better? Or you can say one of them is better long-range or short-range.
I pick the Dragunov b/c I rush w/ snipers rather than camp w/ them and it would be very helpful in close-quarters.
The MK14 is good at picking of enemies at long range but in close-quarters it can have problems such as the rate of fire b/c it can't shoot as fast as your trigger finger (Looks like a modded controller lol), which you will need in a clutch moment against multiple enemies.
LMFAO!!!!!!! Is this even a real question? Do you use Support killstreaks?
You don't have to camp with a Sniper(even though that is the purpose of it) but you can pop from cover to cover.
Not to pile on you, but guys like you are the reason I play in parties as much as possible. What good are you going to do using the WORST Sniper in the game running around trying to outgun SMGs, Shotguns and Assault Rifles?
To answer your question. MK14 without a doubt....I guess teh Dragunov would be good against a team full of splitscreen players with one thumb...
The following 3 users say thank you to Porter_Justice for this useful post: