(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); IMO, I think that they are both good or "OP" guns but I personally like the ACOG Dragunov better because of higher fire rate and just the feel of a sniper that you can spray w/out having a problem of cocking your gun against someone.

You can spray w/ a barret but the recoil sucks lol. (While aiming)

Which one do you guys is better? Or you can say one of them is better long-range or short-range.

I pick the Dragunov b/c I rush w/ snipers rather than camp w/ them and it would be very helpful in close-quarters.

The MK14 is good at picking of enemies at long range but in close-quarters it can have problems such as the rate of fire b/c it can't shoot as fast as your trigger finger (Looks like a modded controller lol), which you will need in a clutch moment against multiple enemies.

MK14. I will never use the Dragunov. It's been in CoD 4, Black Ops, and MW3 and it just won't die... It's like a possum in your house.

mk14 is better without question

MK14 without a doubt! So powerful.

I have a 4.13 kdr with the MK so I'm going to go with MK14.

MK14 for sure. Why? Because I can put a RDS and Rapid fire to spray for days.

The MK14 is definitely a laser but I like the Dragunov more just because you can hang with the big dogs using ACR's and UMP's with a friggin sniper.

MK14 it's sooooo OP in Mw3

Mk14 og =d