(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I got this new school teacher and she made a blog and some friends told me she was talking shit about me but refer to me as "PITA" - Pain in the ass. Yeah I am one but who cares she's a teacher and shouldn't be doing that. Im not talking shit about her so she shouldn't to that.

Unfornatly she put her blog as private today. I really need to watch if she's really talking shit about me.

This is the blog: You must login or register to view this content.

I will pay real $$$ or all my vbux for someone who could bypass the security.

Quote the replys pleasee

Justice never sleeps. :boss:



It's simple. Just use a cache service like google cache, or you can use a website like this. You must login or register to view this content.

Still you took the time to make everything easy for OP

It's for the same reason that I said I didn't want his money. What she did was wrong and someone had to do something about it. People like to think that all hackers are bad people. Well they're wrong. (Even though what I did was hardly considered hacking.)

She expressed her opinions and whatnot on a PRIVATE blog, the key word being private, that's why OP needed help with this. So your earlier post saying it was public wasn't exactly accurate. And she didn't use names, the only reason people assume it was op she was referring to as PITA is because of how he acts and what he did. Please, try tell a story to your friends about one of them, stating how they act with what they did and whatnot and see if they can guess who it is. It'd be difficult to do.

If she was doing it maliciously, she would have used names and done it publicly. You just potentially got someone sacked for expressing themselves without using names and doing it in private.

Congratulations, you're a douche.

You are clearly looking for an argument. The wise don't seek out a fight, but instead they try to ease the burdens of others.

At one point the blog was public. I did not hack her private blog. I just pointed out that there was a record of her blog for when it was public. Nothing illegal was done here other than questionable acts of the teacher.

Clearly she was not being malicious, but she was being disrespectful and caused harm to the student's integrity.

The reason I brought up the point that people could recognize who he was based off of the details released was because people could. Go back to the original post and reread it. Also I even said that he probably deserved it, but does two wrongs make a right?

I understand we have all said something that we ended up regreting, but she refered to the students as disrespectful names on several occasions on a public blog.

So I ask you this. If she has the right to attack his integrity, why doesn't he have the right to defend it?

Congratulations, you're a joke.

You do realise that it's a lot more common for students to slander their teachers, right? Why is it perfectly acceptable for kids and teenagers to insult people that try to help them, but then it's not allowed for the teacher to express herself?

As far as I'm aware, calling somebody names online isn't illegal, so her actions probably aren't illegal. Yes, they were out of line for her to have made the comments in the first place, but you even said yourself he probably deserved it.

You acknowledge that she isn't being malicious, so why do something that could lead to her losing her job? You can call me a joke all you want, I still think you're a douche.

Oh, and calling yourself Anonymous at the bottom of the word document... Classy :ha!:

Edit:
Oh, and I just re-read through some of the stuff you posted, apart from referring to him as PITA she doesn't seem to say anything bad about him from what I've read.

You are funny. You are trying so hard to hold a good argument. Anyways, my dispute. :lol:

I do realize that this is common for students to be disrespectful to teachers in school, but it is far from acceptable. I am not sure what school you go to, but at my old school if you called a teacher an offensive name your punishment would be much harsher that just a day in detention, or a stern "Don't do that". So, if a student would get in trouble for this, why shouldn't the teacher? If you are up to current events a lot of schools are cracking down on cyber-bulling. Though I would not consider the teachers actions as cyber-bulling, I will tell you that she would have received punishments for her acts. Especially if she was at my school where cyber-bulling rules are very strict.

Here is an example so that you may better understand the schooling system. If a student had said the same things as that teacher, but about one of the student's teachers he would most likely be expelled. Even if he said the names in a manner that this teacher did. Which on another note. You see these comments as "playful", but you should better understand the teachers background. She is an American teacher and knows better than this. She would understand that teachers have been fired many times for what she did. So her name "Sarcasmo" is stab at the native language of Honduras. If you read more closely her tone is more condescending than anything. Through reading other posts this tone is further confirmed.

You are right that people should express themselves. Like how you called me a douche bag. When you typed that it probably made you feel better. It probably made you feel as though it would hurt me some how. I actually find the way people act very interesting. The topic itself isn't so controversial. It's just stubborn people looking to prove something. Maybe you are trying to defend the teacher, because you have been in trouble for "expressing" your feelings about someone in the past. You don't have to respond to this paragraph, but I would like you to think about it. Perhaps consider the idea that your judgement may be swayed.

The problem is that while it's not technically illegal to say something hurtful about someone online, someone can press charges. It's not like there is some internet police going around enforcing the law on defamation. It's a real thing. Go look it up. So to call someone offensive names is not illegal, but it's not legal either. Maybe if she was an anonymous blogger, meaning no student/affiliate of the student could go to the blog and see what she said about him, it would be a different story. I am not entirely sure what the Honduran law about such things is. Though I assume the establishment for which the teacher works will take the appropriate actions, because ignoring it would only reflect the establishment itself.

So why would I do something that could cause her to lose her job? Where did you hear that? The chances are that she won't. Whether she is fit to be a teacher, or not is something of another matter. All I want is to give this student a chance to defend himself. Have you even considered the feelings of the student. In the blog she describes a community in which the education is not at it's best. At one point she describes where a student found a bullet in the playground. The chances are the student doesn't know any better. So how does publicly humiliating him help anything. It would only cause friction between the student and the teacher. This would hinder his education and not help him in any way. Believe it, or not adult leaders have a great impact on children and even teens. Studies show that if an adult says something hurtful to a child it is more likely to cause a greater impact than if they were told something hurtful by another child.

It truly amazes me that you could only consider the feelings of that teacher. What she did made her feel "good". Guess that's all that matters right? The fact that she made the student feel like crap doesn't even register huh? And don't say he didn't care, or she didn't hurt him, because why else would he come here just to find out if she had said those things about him? Then again a computer does some weird things to people like you and that teacher. It gives you the ability to not feel. Your heart is instantly hardened as soon as you touch that mouse. You make fun of me for signing anonymous? Well it looks more formal than "MagicalMonkey". If it's such a big deal "internet tough guy" then why don't you come out from behind your computer monitor? It would probably kill you to do some volunteer work for your real community. Which I have no problem doing.

So whats the point of all of this? That you need to look at both sides of a story. Consider the feelings of both people. There's a bit of wisdom for ya. Do you not think that I didn't look into this before posting? I looked into the idea that the teacher was just being playful and that the student was fine with everything, but after looking into it deeper that is not the case.

You need to examine yourself and realize that your computer monitor doesn't protect you from this very real thing called life. I can only hope that you have learned something here. I hope that you can leave this understanding that I am not here to attack you, that a teacher, or anyone else, but instead I am here to defend the helpless. If this is a debate over freedom of expression, then why can't that student "express" his feelings to an administrator? At least he has the balls to say it in person. Unlike that teacher, but I guess it doesn't matter what you say. As long as you say it from behind a computer monitor.

If a student at your school were to say something about a teacher online without naming names, would he or she still be disciplined as harshly as you say? I highly doubt it, but I suppose some places take it much more serious than others.

Teachers have been fired for having pictures on facebook of them drinking at parties, if a picture with no affiliation to the school or students can get a teacher sacked, why do you assume she won't get sacked for posting on her blog about students? And no, i got no satisfaction out of calling you a douche, that was genuinely my opinion of you based on your actions.

And if he was a better student maybe she wouldn't feel the need to resort to venting her frustration online, she does praise him when he does good. And how was she publically humiliating him by not naming names? Yes people could figure out who it was, but damn, I've mentioned this before that's because they were there and already knew what happened. If you just knew the student's real name, and then read the blog you wouldn't know who she was talking about would you?

I've never been in trouble for expressing myself. There are always other people with their own opinions and I actually encourage them to express it. So I'm not entirely sure where you're coming from by assuming I've been in trouble for something like that before.

As far as I can tell you are always going to try defend the teacher. Probably,because you don't like being proven wrong. But every time you reply and come up with these terrible arguments you are only digging yourself a deeper hole. So I will keep this short as the last post was clearly far beyond your attention span. That's why you didn't understand any of it.

I have presented you multiple facts and not just my opinion with weak supporting evidence. Your opinion does not matter to anyone. My opinion can be "camels are gay",but without evidence what does it matter? Here they are in bullet points so that you don't get lost. Try to focus now.

• This teacher called her students names that are inappropriate and were hurtful.
  
• This teacher did not release names of the students.
  
• This teacher did use enough details for her students to recognize who she was talking about.
  
• Her actions though allowing her to feel better, hurt the feelings of the student.
  
• As a result the student came here to ask for help.
  
• I pointed out that her public blog was recorded.
  
• I did not hack anything.
  
• Her blog is not a school blog.
  
• Her blog is attached to her name. Meaning she openly talked about her students in an offensive way.
  
• After realizing that her students saw and knew who she was talking about she made her blog private.
  
• She knew what she did was wrong and tried to cover it up.
  
• When she was asked about what she said she lied and said that she hadn't.
  
• She has pictures of her students on her blog.
  
• In America defamation is a thing and a very bad thing. It has ruined reputations and led to very big law suits.
  
• What she did is considered defamation.
  
• She is an American teacher in Honduras.
  
• You support her acts of defamation.
  
• Though she did not use names,she did not have to, because people knew who she was referring to.
  
• She called her students the following names: PITA(Pain-In-The-Ass), Sarcasmo and Romeo.
  
• She used these names on several occasions in two separate blog posts.
  
• Research has shown that adults have a greater impact on a child when they say something damaging when compared to the impact left by another child.
  
• Teachers have been fired many times as a result of this. I don't know why you keep trying to say this is not true. It is fact.
  

OK. Now in response to your comments...



Yep. The student wouldn't be in detention. He would be in a law suit.



Teachers have been fired for letting their personal life interfere with their job. Teachers are role models for a lot of students and this kind of behavior is not setting a good example. Do you even care about the well being of the students?

Are you sure that what you called me is not just you getting butt hurt over all of this. Well you sought out a fight and now you are making a fool out of your self.
Are your jimmies rustled?



If he was a better student? Maybe if she was a better teacher she could control her class. That is a part of her job you know. It is also her job to punish the student when he is being trouble. Not call him names on the internet. From what I can tell it wasn't just him who was acting out.

This point is invalid. My relation to this student is irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that people that he knew saw this. That is what humiliates him. If my opinion of him mattered to him at all, he would not of asked people to try and get access to the blog. You keep bringing this up like it means something.



You completely missed the point of that. The point was that everyone has their own motives for what they do. I don't know you and would never pretend to. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

Like I said there is no convincing you of anything. You are too stubborn. I was hoping you could learn something here,but I give up. Your "opinion" is clearly not an accepted one. Just read some of the comments here and not just picking out things that help you. I hope that you might reread my previous post.

May an Admin please close this thread. A solution was found.

If anyone would like to continue to talk to me about this I would be happy to. just remember I have a life and my response time will not be quick.