(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

First off they say Obama is socializing the US as he is solely attempting to raise taxes on the wealthy, who already have a tax rate around 50% or more. Opposes to cutting the budget and ending programs he plans on extending them.

Not every becomes a criminal once they are bankrupt. People have the freedom to make the decision of what they wish to do with their money. If anything financial education should be a part of the school system.

By welfare, if you are speaking of a socialist society (I could be misunderstanding you), I say no. Socialism never and will never work. Why would I work as hard as the next guy if we both will have the same pay and benefits. Great concept, but it fails. More importantly it takes out the ability to enjoy luxuries as much. I prefer a capitalist society.

---------- Post added at 03:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:21 PM ----------


Why exactly?

It isn't socialism, or do you see that Nordic Countries have socialism? No.

Obama is better than Bush, because Bush started unnecessary war, spent too much money on military and because of him, many people on Middle-East hate America and see it as "Great Satan"

Thanks for telling him why Obama is better than Bush. I didn't have to bother myself.

Where do you get your news?

Anyways, Obamacare is a failure and goes against the constitution. Obama's goal is to make the wealthy pay for everything, even though their tax rate is over 50% (Great deal right). He will not cut any programs and did not follow through anything he stated he would do in his campaign.

Give me one successful thing Obama has done.

---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:04 PM ----------


I'm guessing you don't live in America. Am I correct?

---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:05 PM ----------


What would you of told me?

He promised to cut programs, where YOU get YOUR news.

For example:
- Obama started evacuate soldiers off Iraq.
- US image is much better than it was on when Bush was president.
- He cares more about environment than Bush.

There's much more, too lazy to write :p

He didn't thats the point. I get my news from yahoo, AOL, MSN, Fox, and sometimes ABC. Now where do you get yours?


He hasn't left Iraq yet as he stated he would. Why? Because that was a political move when in reality there was no way we would be prepared to leave that early in.

How is the US Image better? He changes his mind constantly. He decides to no do anything with Egypt until the very end, and is find with going into Libya almost immediately. Environment? Give me 5 facts for what he has done for the Environment.

I have a feeling you watch only liberal news, but I could be wrong.


Go ahead write it. I will for what I think.

- He blames Republicans for every little thing that goes wrong.
- He passed an unconstitutional and inefficient healthcare bill.
- He hasn't done anything he promised in his campaign.
- He won't cut any program even though the budget is at 4 trillion per year.
- He will tax the wealthy some more to pay for those programs, even though they already pay over 50% tax rate.
- He has increased the debt even further by trillions.
- He has passed an inefficient stimulus everyone seems to forgets about.
- He loves to expand government and kick the private sector in the shin.

Shall I go on?

Fox is best news source, right? /facepalm

He hasn't left Iraq, because you need forces to prevent terrorist attacks, and Iraq government doesn't have enough forces to do that.

It's (image) better, you think it was better when Bush was president? Hell no.

Well, Bush didn't give a **** about environment, so he cares more.

I've feeling that you only watch shitty conservative news *cough* fox. And I watch The Finnish Broadcasting Company, it's like BBC.

He isn't the best president US has had, but definitely better than Bush.

The point is I watch and read multiple news sources. I have ever seen. Also, you still haven't told me what network you use.


Exactly. But he made the promise he would.


That is a horrible statement. You gave me no reason he cares more about the environment in anyway.


Way to bag on the only real conservative network. Fox isn't as bad as it seems. Yes it has some shows that are bad, but it has plenty of shows that are as hardcore republican, unlike MSNBC. Also, are you saying your against conservatives?

If someone who knows the FBC clarify to me if its liberal that would be great.


Funny how you still haven't written anything on how he is better yet I wrote this

It's YLE, not FBC lol.
And it's public-broadcasting organization. So it's kinda neutral.

Forces will be out off Iraq in 2011. (Or if you don't believe diplomat, that was telling about my high school, don''t believe it)

Obama has made some environmental acts, just use google.

I'm not against conservatives, I'm against extreme conservatives.

I already posted why he's better than Bush, but looks like you don't remember it anymore. (Yesterday, so you don't have good memory)



- And republicans blame him for every little thing
- Every thing starts with steps, you can't have better and useful system ASAP, you've to make investments.
- He have done something:
You must login or register to view this content.
- He also cut some programs, read You must login or register to view this content., and he started his program, to cut 5billion in next 15 years, and you're whining that he isn't doing anything? Unbelievable and contradictory if you ask me.
- Wealthy people have enough money to pay, where you got that "over 50%"
- I think you mean heath care investments? I said before, why he did that. You've to make investments.
- I don't know what you mean by here.
- It's better that it's more public, people get more egalitarian treatment in health centers, basically situation is that public sector sucks and only poor go there, and those who have enough money go to private sector, that just isn't right IMO.

It's funny when you try to defend Bush.