Originally posted by CodFatherxx
"Fact", why do you quote facts, they are facts
Because the name of that debate, "God vs Fact," implies that there are no facts that back up the existence of God, or the theory of creationism, and that all the facts support non-creationism theories. There are plenty of facts that disprove, or support the falsity of, the big bang theory, evolution, and other non-creationism theories. If we take the title completely for what it says, then none of these facts exist, and the only facts are ones disproving the existence of god.
It would be completely
impossible to disprove the existence of god, because there are no facts that actually disprove his existence; they only support other theories. If the big bang theory is correct, then that does not mean that a god does not exist. The name "God vs Fact" is biased and incorrect.