(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Which do you think is better and why?

Personally, I prefer the far right because I value de jure freedom over de facto equality. The latter is simply not practical, whereas the former is, in theory, the position of the United States (supported by the Constitution).

Also, I prefer tradition over change. Change is not some kind of inherently good thing--there is such thing as bad change. Social Darwinism is also a much better policy than multiculturalism. I also like the idea of private charity more than public welfare, as I like the ability to delegate which individuals/causes my money goes to instead of trusting the government.

You must login or register to view this content.

EQUAL! but the right seems much safer to me. im hanging from the middle right

Ha. I think that's a bit of an exaggeration. I said one was better than the other, not that either was perfect. Jamming a ton of people together that are polar opposites for the sake of diversity is much worse than Social Darwinism.

I never said multiculturalism was perfect either. Social Darwinism was the main basis of Nazism. It's a rationale for racist groups.

No, I realize that. Just defending my preference. Anyway, just look at Stalin. He was far worse.

I can't quote you because I'm on my phone. It seems as though you're just taking cheap shots at me. If you have a problem with me just man up and say it, I don't have time for kiddies trying to start shit.

Far Right. Elfmotat, you say everything the typical far lefter would say - anything and everything without having a logical reasoning behind it.

Let me get this straight...

is this the sort of reasoning you'd prefer?

You must login or register to view this content.

Ehh... what? First of all, I'm not a far lefter so your point is invalid right off the bat. This is me:

You must login or register to view this content.

Second, what did I say? I said that Social Darwinism was the rationale behind Nazism and a number of racist groups. This is a fact. It's akin to saying Laissez-Faire economics are at the heart of conservatism.

Third, you say everything the typical far righter would say - anything and everything without having a logical reasoning behind it.

Fourth, the only thing relevant to this thread in your post were the first two words.


You must login or register to view this content.