(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Well, why? It's basically the same as saying your gay, its your own choice to do what you want. You're not affecting anyone at all.

Why do people in the SB be racist to Jews people?

There are many people from 2000 yrs ago or more whose existence is proved. There happens to be little contempary historical data on Christ. Most of the records in that area were destroyed by roman pogroms in Judea in the latter half of the 1st century.
But he is generally recogonized by secular historians to have lived in the first centuary based on non christen references made about him in writings from the 1st and 2nd centuries.
Do you deny the existance of Aristotle or some other ancient figures?
Many of the writings, used to verify their existance, were done more than 100 yrs after their deaths.

If you want to write fictionary stories of a modern messiah remember that you will need to convince a third of the world population to ascribe to your writings at the pain of death.
In a modern world of doubters I would challenge you to convince 1%.
If you can get 60 million followers over the next 300 yrs I would say you have another literary masterpiece.

And I doubt if Christ was the son of god,
And have many doubts about the truth or accuracy of the testements.
But I have little doubt that a man named Christ existed.

Errrr just to chime in here, im not saying im right but didnt some of Jesus's disciples right the bible? So they met him obviously.

Yet Jesus's existence hasn't. Odd don't you think?

---------- Post added at 10:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:31 AM ----------



None of his diciples met him actually. Nobody who wrote in the bible ever met Jesus

Idk its just what i remember from like 7th grade. I guess im wrong

I think it's because they're GREEDY...

There's historic proof of Jesus, but no scientific. But as mentioned before, there's no scientific proof of Alchemy (those crazy guys who speak to the wind to find out things in the future and other such things) but there's historic proof. Is that true too?
Also, as i'm not premium I cannot see who neg repped me, i'd like to know so I can know why i'm 'so ignorant' as opposed to the millions of people who follow religion and rule out most science (by the way, science is actually true so you can't ignore it forever) so those that follow something written in a dated book, word for word and do not take any notice of those who see the truth, are ignorant to the truth. So in actual fact those who follow religion are ignorant to everybody elses beliefs. I'm open minded, however a lot of the religions are ridiculous. All of them are very similar and the very first recorded religion was in Egypt, 'Gods son' which got misinterpreted as 'Son of God', hence the religions we know today. It was Horus, the Sun God and he was born on the 25th December, born of a Virgin and baptised. Coincidence? I think not. The person for this Egyptian who took the place of Moses and read what God had said to be the rules of the land, and this individual was named 'Mises'. Coincidence? Nah.

The ignorance in this thread is a joke.

Dan, you need to keep your biased and one sided views to yourself on a topic which can affect others. OK, we get it, you don't believe in Jesus or religion, no need to keep rambling on about how you have to be right, and proof is needed, etc etc.

The ammount of times i've heard people like you speak without real knowledge is quite amusing. You always come with that science over religion bollocks, and that science is ALWAYS right. Most of the time you're missing the point of what it is people are talking about. You give stupid little examples in the hope of winding people up or hoping people will jump on your bandwagon and agree with you. That's what people like you thrive off and where you got your information from most likely, passed down from the previous other ignorant people via the internet.

As for people hating Jews, go and ask people in the real world, not on a stupid gaming website full of arrogant and ignorant children who are overly influenced by the internet and their piers. Generally religious people will stick together and non-religious also, that's the way of life and a way of prolonging your way of life/culture. Why do you think religious groups segregate themselves in areas in certain cities? It's cus they're scared of being influenced by non-believers and polluted by the ignorance they keep.

I am not religious at all, but i can't stand people who are so athiest they feel its their job to campaign against religion and try and make others follow suit. You may argue thats what religion does, but religion holds very good moral values and teachings which people can take heed from. Being an athiest and using science as your answer for everything molds you into a person, which unfortunately, the world is full of in this day and age. That is an ignorant, biased and full of yourself person who does not understand the notion of what it is religion does for people. Your views are based on a westernised culture. Try telling me if you lived in Africa, you wouldn't have faith and believe in God due to the circumstances you're surrounded by?

Take a step back and look at the bigger picture and at how you can make a difference in what you say and do, not follow suit and the crowd, which eventually leads you where? To a better enlightenment? No. To a better understanding? No.

Please enlighten me as to where it leads you?