How can they prove someone that existed like 2000 years ago, i could start writing about a fictionary person and make life-like journals of this person and in the future it would be counted as real cause they got no idea.

We found the tomb with the blood around the head and same facial features that were described. Also, carbon dating brings it back to the exact time of his death. around 0-50 A.D

Charles Guignebert (Professor of the History Of Christianity at the Sorbonne), while rejecting the Jesus Myth theory and feeling that the Epistles of Paul were sufficient to prove the historical existence of Jesus, said "all the pagan and Jewish testimonies, so-called, afford us no information of any value about the life of Jesus, nor even any assurance that he ever lived."

If there was proof you would have shown me instead of telling me to google a question and scour the internet for something I know is false. Plus, even if he did exist he probably just did card tricks his father taught him.

---------- Post added at 07:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 PM ----------

Just wait. In 2000 years people will think Edward Cullen existed and loads of people will read Twilight as a bible

Even Christians are unsure

Your not getting it..am i saying he was god no..all im saying was he was a real man im not saying anything relating to religion so the whole cards thing doesn't even go along with it

You're not getting it. Am i saying he was God? No. All im saying (etc etc)

No, there is none what so ever. All so called "evidence" that the Christians point to when this comes up has been fabricated by Christians hundreds of years after the supposed life of Jesus Christ. They obviously realized how embarrassing it was to believe in someone that there was no proof of existence of. The Romans, Jews as well as other peoples at the time were all very good at documenting what was happening in their world so there would have been a mention of him had he been real. This is why mentions of Christ has later been incorporated into old texts by people as "evidence". Josephus texts are among the most famous for being falsification by later Christians and he was also an obvious choice since he lived in Jerusalem decades after the supposed death of Christ. He was there and he would have heard of Christ, yet he never mentioned him.

There is an interesting passage in the Talmud, IMO, about the execution of Yeshu. (Talmud Sanhedrin 43a) Yeshu = Jesus, and it was a common and popular name back then so there are several Yeshu in the Talmud.

"It is taught: On the eve of Passover they hung Yeshu and the crier went forth for forty days beforehand declaring that "Yeshu is going to be stoned for practising witchcraft, for enticing and leading Israel astray. Anyone who knows something to clear him should come forth and exonerate him." But no one had anything exonerating for him and they hung him on the eve of Passover."

This takes place about a century before the biblical new testament Christ comes into existence and there are more examples of "trouble makers" that are executed. This is proof of the fact that there were many Messiah, Kings of Jews and so on that were "leading Israel astray" and it also gives reason to think that Jesus Christ is not one person who lived at a specific time in history but a combination of many men that lived over a longer amount of time.

Jesus Christ in the new testament is a very political figure that was used by Paul and others for their own political agendas. This is why Paul, a man that never met Christ in person (since it was impossible, obviously) is the one who decides what Christianity is all about rather than the close relatives and friends of Christ. There would simply be too many "christs", "messiahs" as well as families and followers. Paul removed them all to "clean up the act" and make the story more credible and easier to sell during his political campaign.

-----
* This is the correct category for all religious mythology.
* The Shroud of Turin is an old forgery. It's a very old forgery and is interesting as such, but it's still a forgery. You must login or register to view this content.
* The so called "family grave of Jesus", The Talpiot Tomb, can't be connected to the Jesus Christ of the biblical new testament. To assume that it is the tomb of Jesus Christ you also have to assume that his fathers name was Jose, that he was married (had children) and that he did not get resurrected and go to heaven. It's absurd to be willing to believe in such a thing and still say that the bible is true, word by word. [url]https://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/The…[/url]
* The Christians and Muslims of this world, those who believe in Jesus, makes up about 54% not 90%.

Neither does your stupid little question thing. Let me correct it for you



If you're going to argue a case, at least spell right and use grammar. No there's no solid proof. This carbon dating shit you're going on about hasn't even happened. Show me the source you read this misinformation from, or was it a cheap low budget documentary on the history channel?

UCH, there's NO proof there's Jesus, none whatsoever besides the bible and other books. There's no carbon dating or anything. It's bullshit

Here, try this copypasta

Alright whatever. No need to have a hissy fit over it, keep your opinion and ill keep mine.

Bob Marley?

pics or it didnt happen