Post: How was the Earth Created?
Options
02-19-2011, 01:41 AM
#1
- Some people believe God Created Earth.
-Some people believe it was created Scientifically.
Which one do you think?
Some Info:
Originally posted by another user
The world was created by a long process beginning with the collapse of a huge molecular cloud under the influence of gravity. Most of the mass collected to form the sun, with a disk of material (the protoplanetary disk) spread out around the newly formed star. Further "ordering" under gravimetric influence produced "centers of accretion" where enough material gathered to form the planets. All of these facts can be checked by using the link below and then following the many links there. Though there is no proof that God created the world, there is no proof that He did not do it, and by using this means to bring about His plan. You are completely free to see things as you wish, but you are strongly urged to think for yourself. The earth and the other planets exist, they all orbit the sun, and all move in the same direction. These facts fit the model of the formation of the earth. This is impossible to know for sure. The leading theory is the big bang which created the entire universe as we know it and provided the elements for the first stars. There was a giant star where the solar system is now. It exploded spreading material out through space. The material contained all the elements we find in our solar system today. After many millions of years the material started to come together again because of gravity. Most of the material came together in the middle to form our sun. The rest of material circled round the sun and came together through gravity and collisions to make the planets about 4.5 billion years ago. It took another few million years for the collisions to stop, one giant collision with the early Earth is thought to have created the moon. The Earth started off molten but began to cool and formed the crust. During the cooling most of the water and gases were released from inside to form the oceans and the atmosphere. After life evolved it changed the atmosphere and the surface to what we see now.
More Info:
Originally posted by another user
Created by God. The Earth and the whole universe was created by God. On the first day of creation he created light and darkness. On the second day he created water and sky. On the third day he separated the dry ground from the oceans and created all vegetation. On the forth day he created the sun, moon, and stars. On the fifth day he created all of the water dwelling creatures. On this day he also created all of the birds. On the sixth day he created all of the creatures of the land. It was on this day that he gave life to man. He called this man Adam. On the seventh day God rested.
I got this info from You must login or register to view this content..
But you can google it for more info
The following user thanked JOT for this useful post:
02-19-2011, 05:26 AM
#23
RavagedBoom
Sing My Guitar
02-19-2011, 04:52 PM
#27
skitterz
AD/HD
Originally posted by DEREKTROTTER
then who made God?
Exactly what I'm trying to get at here, if we're humans, and god is a human too, then it can't be him if you think really deep in to this subject.
This is the post I made in this thread, with similar thoughts as you:
Originally posted by skitterz
Well, some may say "God," but god was a human too. You have to remember that, that's why I'm going to go with scientifically, and if you really think deeply about this subject, and imagine how the **** world, and planets, and the universe was even created, it gets really weird. Same goes for thinking about if there was just nothing.
02-19-2011, 05:07 PM
#28
NeedaLifeSoon
Retired Life
Originally posted by skitterz
Exactly what I'm trying to get at here, if we're humans, and god is a human too, then it can't be him if you think really deep in to this subject.
This is the post I made in this thread, with similar thoughts as you:
This is the post I made in this thread, with similar thoughts as you:
Well if we are going to do posts from other threads, then here is mine on the belief in a god.
Quote:10-15-2010
Originally posted by another user
Originally Posted by Automaton
Probability is all we have for any argument. I think you will find that is what the whole debate lays its feet on. As you said, there either is or there isn't, and we don't know. Therefore, we debate probabilities. For instance, christians would say that god is more probable due to irreducible complexity.
Just because something is unfalsifiable does not mean its probabilities cannot be argued. For instance, we can all debate how probable it is the loch ness monster exists.
Probability is all we have for any argument. I think you will find that is what the whole debate lays its feet on. As you said, there either is or there isn't, and we don't know. Therefore, we debate probabilities. For instance, christians would say that god is more probable due to irreducible complexity.
Just because something is unfalsifiable does not mean its probabilities cannot be argued. For instance, we can all debate how probable it is the loch ness monster exists.
A naturalistic view must argue probability as it explanation of the impossibility of a designed universe. As mans development of scientific thought expands to explain the creation of the universe it is challenged with the concept of a beginning. Current physics theories are struggling to unify quantum, relativity, string and others and are calling a hoped for universal theory M theory. If there is no current explanation for the start of the universe, and the beginning of time and space, then there must be multiverse explanation..
There can be no other probability allowed into the discussion. This view must rule out all other types of thought including philosophical discussion on man’s concepts of conscience, or instinctual distinction of right and wrong.
All alternative explanations must be reduced to the Santa Claus theory.
When every debate ends up on the possibility of a deity or intelligent design of the universe it must be debunked by calling it some nonsensical term. It was Santa, a pixie, or the Loch Ness monster who started it all, or one can always fall back on ridiculing man’s religious writings. Any educated person understands that they were written by man and are not to be literally interpreted.
One does not need to be religious or naturalistically bound to question probability factors in their ideas of the beginning of it all. They are not bound by the possibility of a supernatural explanation for creation because of a fear that the line of thought leads to belief in the Loch Ness Monster.
There was a beginning and its cause has not been determined for certain.
One can make two choices about is cause. A naturalistic view is bound by a provable explanation. The other is willing to accept a different explanation and is bound by their faith in that belief until it is changed through ridicule or a alternative provable explanation.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
