Post: Usa VS Russia
11-16-2011, 05:12 AM #1
ic0de
Hurah!
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); If the united states were to go to war with russia, who would win and why? Share opinions.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following user groaned ic0de for this awful post:

the stuff
12-27-2011, 08:44 PM #65
Just4Hax
"I will speak ill of
Originally posted by Whiskey View Post
Nato would lose nuclear or not.. If the Us invaded russia china north korea and most likely iran would pose as allies... also russias military is ALOT bigger then the us' also England and France could never take on russia LOL i can't believe you actually even conisdered that

/facepalm The US military has 400,000 more personnel than the Russian. As for the allies, why in the world would China ally with Russia.

Seriously, everyone stop thinking you know global politics from playing mw3

The following user thanked Just4Hax for this useful post:

Millz
12-27-2011, 09:07 PM #66
Originally posted by ic0de View Post
If the united states were to go to war with russia, who would win and why? Share opinions.


i think USA as they are a powerful military and russia pussied out of afghan and us took over and are doing a pretty good job alongside british,french so overall USA!
12-27-2011, 11:10 PM #67
Pichu
RIP PICHU.
Originally posted by Millz59 View Post
I'll tell you why the US lost the Vietnam war. Because it was a loosing war from the start. They pretty much abandoned their troops and hadn't really planned on staying so long in the war. Plus the US was fighting on unknown soil and had absolutely no tactical advantage. They had the worst gun they could possibly have, the M16, which jammed frequently. The AK-47 which the Russians supplied to Vietnam, almost never jammed. As a fun fact, part of the training for the Vietnamese was to drag the AK in sand, and fire it. The AK is a very reliable rifle and the M16 had really just started out, which is why most of our "Modern Day" planes and helicopters and actually just nicer looking types of technology that come from the 70's 80's and 90's. We use technology that is old and reliable, which is why the Russians still use the AK-47. Over time however, the M16 has gotten better, but of course the AK is much easier to use and more reliable.



It was a rhetorical question, everything yous aid is stuff I already knew about, aha. :P

The following user thanked Pichu for this useful post:

Millz
12-28-2011, 01:08 AM #68
Originally posted by Millz59 View Post
I'll tell you why the US lost the Vietnam war. Because it was a loosing war from the start. They pretty much abandoned their troops and hadn't really planned on staying so long in the war. Plus the US was fighting on unknown soil and had absolutely no tactical advantage. They had the worst gun they could possibly have, the M16, which jammed frequently. The AK-47 which the Russians supplied to Vietnam, almost never jammed. As a fun fact, part of the training for the Vietnamese was to drag the AK in sand, and fire it. The AK is a very reliable rifle and the M16 had really just started out, which is why most of our "Modern Day" planes and helicopters and actually just nicer looking types of technology that come from the 70's 80's and 90's. We use technology that is old and reliable, which is why the Russians still use the AK-47. Over time however, the M16 has gotten better, but of course the AK is much easier to use and more reliable.

America never lost a war. Vietnam is classified has a "conflict" :p
01-01-2012, 11:52 PM #69
TheDeathMachine
Do a barrel roll!
why do you even care... Wars = bad
01-20-2012, 12:19 AM #70
x1337-
Do a barrel roll!
Originally posted by ic0de View Post
If the united states were to go to war with russia, who would win and why? Share opinions.

USA, considering we have the most powerful air force in the world.

---------- Post added at 07:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:17 PM ----------

Originally posted by BlueSlidePark View Post
So you based your decision off of a TV show?


On topic:

nobody can survive a nuclear war.. so nobody would win.

To be honest England+France could probably take on Russia..


If it wasn't a nuclear there's no question about it.. Nato would win. Nato consist of about 29 other nations that would assist in war, also we have other allies not in NATO. First off, China is smart enough to stay out of the war plus China has their own problems to worry about.. Plus Russia isnt even allies with China!







Another thing, stop playing MW3 so much. Russia aren't enemies.. it's just a video game.. ahaha


France is a bunch of pussies, they couldnt even defend themselves in WW2 against Nazi Germany. If it wasnt for the US, the French and England would be speaking German right now
01-20-2012, 12:50 AM #71
Nazuruv
TITS OR GTFO
I live in the usa and support our troops...
but honestly I think Russia would whoop us.
They have children getting ready for war.
/shakes head
although we would all be doomed
01-20-2012, 12:52 AM #72
Just4Hax
"I will speak ill of
Originally posted by Olegks View Post
I live in the usa and support our troops...
but honestly I think Russia would whoop us.
They have children getting ready for war.
/shakes head
although we would all be doomed

You obviously have no clue about war...
01-20-2012, 12:58 AM #73
Nazuruv
TITS OR GTFO
Originally posted by Just4Hax View Post
You obviously have no clue about war...


YOU know nothing about russia.

---------- Post added at 08:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 PM ----------

You must login or register to view this content.
:wtf:

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo