(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); After playing the three games, they all have an amazing campaign. Which do you think had to best? Move if in wrong thread.

I vote for MW2

I will vote for MW3, because MW2 was boring every time you played as Ramirez( Fuk Foley) and to repetitive.
Kill enemies go back, kill again, return to base, go out and protect. That was exhausting. In MW3 playing as the SEALS was fun and playing as Yuri aswell.
MW3 was more action packed, I'm going to quote some members in the forums saying:

-''The campaign is Michael Bay on steroids.''-

I haven't played cod4 but between MW2 and MW3. I'll choose MW3 hands down

I'd vote CoD4, because MW2 was extremly unbalance and MW3, well even though MW2 was unbalanced I like it more than MW3, cause it just felt same shit I had seen in previous games.



You should play Borderlands, it has a very good campaign even thought it's usually called as Role-playing shooter.

Ffs how many of these threads have to be made? cod4 that's it , come on with these generic ass threads

At the beginning i thought mw2 but cod4 for me

I've heard good stuff about Boarderlands. To an RPG fan like myself when someone says FPS-RPG that just means FPS that doesn't suck. Generally most FPS-RPGs have so few RPG elements that I consider them FPS's and nothing more, eg. BioShock. The ability to upgrade your character doesn't make a game an RPG, you need to be playing a role in a larger plot where you can get immersed, with customisation or specialisation avaliable to your character/team. Fallout 3 is an FPS-RPG because it feels like it's a proper RPG where you just happen to do a lot of shooting, which is how it should be. Most game designers mess this up.

Unfortunately I find the art-style of Boarderlands to be exceptionally harsh, so much so that it gives me a headache. I'll hopefully get a chance to try it out but I can't see myself ever playing if for more than a couple of hours.

MW3 is the best by far.