Post: 911 a conspiracy?
08-11-2009, 10:25 PM #1
Antones
Blood of Innocence
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Do you think 911 is a Conspiracy? There are many different cases to say it is.

Case 1: Remote Demolitions.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0Ms7mId34"]YouTube - 9/11 CONSPIRACY: A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION DESTROYED THE WTC!![/ame]

People are saying that 911 was a controlled demolition. As you heard in the video people say that the heard sounds as if it was a demolition. Also Look at the way the buliding cascades in. Controlled right? To me if a plane hit a tower i think that the tower could with stand a bit longer. But the way it falls and go's down quickly. I think its defo controlled.

Case 2: The Aircrafts

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzbVn3o8JNE&feature=related"]YouTube - 9/11 CONSPIRACY: WAS FLIGHT 175 A MILITARY PLANE?[/ame]

When the footage of the second plane to hit the WTC is closely analyzed, there are several anomalies that are apparent. The first is an asymmetrical missile-like object on the belly of the plane t...
When the footage of the second plane to hit the WTC is closely analyzed, there are several anomalies that are apparent. The first is an asymmetrical missile-like object on the belly of the plane that should not be on a commercial airliner. The second is the flash the emits from this "pod" a second before the impact with the building. Was this plane indeed a Commercial airliner? Was the anomaly on the underside of the plane actually a high-tech weapon? See "In plane site" for free of google video for more information.

Case 3: Thermite in the towers

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv2ck2qsiGA&feature=related"]YouTube - 9/11 CONSPIRACY: EVIDENCE OF THERMITE AT THE SOUTH TOWER[/ame]

BYU physicist Professor Steven Jones told peers at a Utah meeting that, "while almost no fire, even one ignited by jet fuel, can cause structural steel to fail, the combination of thermite and sulf...
BYU physicist Professor Steven Jones told peers at a Utah meeting that, "while almost no fire, even one ignited by jet fuel, can cause structural steel to fail, the combination of thermite and sulfur "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."

Jones points to this video which shows a bright yellow molten substance dripping from the south tower minutes before its collapse. Government investigators claimed that this was aluminum from Flight 175 but Jones is adamant that aluminum is silvery in appearance and doesn't turn yellow.

Jones also told the media that sulfur traces found at ground zero indicates the thermite was combined with sulphur to make it burn even hotter than the normal 2500 degrees Celsius.

Jones stated that thermite was a "clever" choice because its ingredients, aluminum and iron oxide do not require identifying tags by law, meaning they couldn't be traced back to their manufacturers.

Case 4: United 93 Getting Shot down OR Passengers Took it down

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGRyotcPh4&feature=channel_page"]YouTube - 9/11 CONSPIRACY: THE LEGEND OF FLIGHT 93[/ame]

We all know the inspiring story of Flight 93, of the heroic passengers who forced the hijacked plane to the ground, sacrificing themselves to save the lives of others. The only trouble is: it may s...
We all know the inspiring story of Flight 93, of the heroic passengers who forced the hijacked plane to the ground, sacrificing themselves to save the lives of others. The only trouble is: it may simply not be true.

The fate of United Airlines Flight 93, the last of the four hijacked planes to go down in the United States on 11 September, holds no mystery for Lee Purbaugh. He saw what happened with his own eyes. He was the only person present in the field where, at 10.06am, the aircraft hit the ground.

"There was an incredibly loud rumbling sound and there it was, right there, right above my head - maybe 50ft up," says Purbaugh, who works at a scrapyard overlooking the crash site. "It was only a split second but it looked like it was moving in slow motion, like it took forever. I saw it rock from side to side then, suddenly, it dipped and dived, nose first, with a huge explosion, into the ground. I knew immediately that no one could possibly have survived."

The shortage of available facts did not prevent the creation of an instant legend - a legend that the US government and the US media were pleased to propagate, and that the American public have been eager, for the most part, to accept as fact. The legend goes like this: the passengers on the hijacked United flight, alerted on their mobile phones to the news of the other three hijacked planes, decide that if they are not going to save themselves at least they will do the patriotic thing and spare the lives of those who are the terrorists' intended targets; so they charge down the aisle, storm the cockpit, where a terrorist is at the controls, and, in the ensuing struggle, force the plane down.

Case 5: Pentagon Strike

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvNTDzpRkG0&feature=channel"]YouTube - 9/11 CONSPIRACY: PENTAGON STRIKE!![/ame]

Was the pentagon really hit by a Boeing 757 jet?

There was no trace of it!
---------------------------------------

Ok this post is legit. I really did make this myself. It took about 45 minutes to make. If i find any other relevant information to go up on here ill add it. Ok please keep it to a clean debate. Rep And thanks would be nice.
Ant
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following user thanked Antones for this useful post:

LilP
08-11-2009, 11:36 PM #2
AgentJon
Former Staff
Yes! I think it is very much.
Check the movie, Loose Change, it is worth a watch.
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE"]YouTube - 911 Loose Change (full-length)[/ame]
08-11-2009, 11:50 PM #3
yes it was fixed because look terrorist have never attacked before and till now and obama is going easy on the terrorrists soo yeah
08-12-2009, 01:29 AM #4
elfmotat
Rᵤᵥ - ½gᵤᵥR ∝ Tᵤᵥ
No, I don't think it was. I'm too lazy now, but I'll make a larger post debunking the popular conspiracy theorists' claims later.
08-12-2009, 01:30 AM #5
RICHIE209
March 6, 2011.
Meh. People died, we are still fighting the war. It's a lose lose.
08-12-2009, 05:13 AM #6
I close friend of mine lost his sister in the pentagon. She worked as a secretary in the 2nd level. She was basically burned to dust, no remains. No its not a conspiracy and I wont even go there. Of course Obama is taking it easy on the terrorist, he's to busy spending money we dont have on other crap.

If you ask me...Bush=FAIL & Obama=FAIL.





You must login or register to view this content.


You must login or register to view this content.
08-12-2009, 05:39 AM #7
ok why would they start a war causing lives of men women and children for no ression it makes no sense american has fought in many wars over the corse of time and we have gone in to other countrys and kicked ass maybe its was time we got attacked plus what good could come out of starting a war. i mean terrorist have been in american for a long time and there still are so by invading there country would only piss them off and cause them to return the favor and hit us and cause damage in area full of little kids and other people. yea the american goverment is messed up and they do things in secert and hide the truth from the puplic but this is something not even bush would do. and by hinting that the leaders of this country would is called trision and is and should be pusihabel by death.
08-12-2009, 07:37 AM #8
Dopey
NGU :/
even though i strongly believe 911 was a terrorist act, it COULD be government related. We needed a reason to go to war and this indeed gave us a reason to declare war on them. The attack on WTC also made Americans more patriotic. Soon after you saw more American flags than you have ever seen. and finally 9-11. thats the number we call in case of any emergency.
These are all opinions most people would have who believe its a conspiracy and i havent watched the videos but i will in a minute =D

---------- Post added at 12:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 AM ----------

ok heres my "reviews" on the videos:
video 1:
buildings have gas lines. when a plane crashes into a building, it will break some gas lines letting gas into the air. once that gas reaches the flames it will set all the gas on fire sending a chain of explosions all the way to the gas main. also once there is a small explosion, the top part of the building will fall down towards the bottom of the building causing it to collapse the way it did.
video 2:
it was an AA plane get over it! as for the pic at the end of the vid that said the plane didnt fit, the plane did not fly directly through the building. it was sideways making the damage less on the pentagon than it would if it was straight.
video 3:
those things look like sparks
video 4:
all opinions (i think this i think that)
video 5:
no comment
08-12-2009, 07:51 AM #9
Yea I've heard about this a while ago and evidence points that it was the U.S government so gotta go with that
08-12-2009, 11:03 AM #10
Antones
Blood of Innocence
Yes. In september 11th of 2008 there was a programme on TV about 911. And people where saying that the government caused it because they were in debt and the towers cost to much money to run.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo