(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); So i saw some show about this and i was wondering what you guys all think.

My reasoning for this.

We supposedly evolved from monkeys or what ever, this could seem logical untill i ask you where all the missing links went. each link should be more fit for life according to the theory of evolution through natural selection so why did they all die out but the monkeys were left behind?.

idk how to spell it Coelocanth (that old fish thing) was supposed to be the missing link from fish to amphibians. there are no signs at all that this fish has evolved in any way at all.

No missing strings between giraffe and what ever it evolved from.... here is what i found on wiki


History and Orgin


The giant squid had no chance against the giraffe
It is believed by evolutionist scientists, that some million years ago Camelopard Girrafids evolved from tiny worm like creatures known as "Jim". (The Jim evolved from rocks, which evolved from water, which evolved from the nothing of the universe.) The CG's later evolved into Michael Jackson. Scientists have yet to find the missing link between Michael Jackson and Giraffe, and while some cling to this theory others conclude that the giraffe is actually the spawn of Michael Jackson's victims, and were some how conceived through the power of an anti-matter explosion during the act of "Surprise butt sex".
Giraffes almost became extinct in 1953 due to the 5 year ice-age that prevailed when Nelson Mandella farted. The population was halved by 1954. Luckily, due to the invention of the turtle neck in 1955, the population levels stabilized at 10,000 and have risen since. Turtles, however, have not fared as well.
The future of giraffes was put to the test when Noah would not let any of them into his ark. They managed to cut a deal with the unicorns, who traded 2 of their 6 places for an ancient giraffe cookie recipe. Of course, after the flood, the giraffes eliminated the unicorn species, in order to keep their recipe safe, which is still a well kept secret to this day. Giraffes are the only animal, apart from humans, that have wiped out an entire species of animal for entertainment purposes (the woolly mammoth in 1823 and the giant squid in 1967).
small ass dick that is black so do not be surprised about a small black cock..



Clearly that is alot but LOL ^^

anyways no links have been discovered of the giraffe so yeah... what you guys thnk?

Shouldn't this be in the intellectual section...

idk honestly... the god vs fact was here so i just put this here. idk where debate section went. lol at your sig picture though

It's more than logical, there is hard evidence.


Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Orrorin tugenensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Kenyanthropus platyops
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi
Australopithecus sediba
Australopithecus aethiopicus
Australopithecus robustus
Australopithecus boisei
Homo habilis
Homo georgicus
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo floresiensis
Homo sapiens sapiens


We did not evolve from modern day monkeys, we both evolved from a common ancestor though.


Evolution doesn't mean some big bad upgrade. It could be the slightest difference.


Not sure about that, but then again giraffes aren't exactly what's heavily researched.

Evolution is one of the strongest theories out there with genetic evidence, fossil evidence, vestigial organs, etc...

... well most of those links were actually made up... Thats what it said on the show. so googled it and it said the very same sooo... genetic evidence? please take a shot at that fish i was talking about... that completely fucks the theory over.. Explain how cells came to be for me aswell since that makes no sense at all. i read that if evolution worked as it supposedly does then eskimos would be fury and have black skin for warmth... and that people in hot places would be white.. africa hawaii... neither of them are white areas.

---------- Post added at 10:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 PM ----------


hard evidence my ass... you literally need to be retarded to think that a fish decided that it would have a better life out of water so it grew legs and lungs and just left.

Fish have almost no brain and back then with development, their mental capability was probably less than what it is now ten fold. It doesn't mean they sprang out of the water and walked.

Easy comparison, a frog. A frog starts out in the water, no legs and then slowly grows them. It then begins making attempts to leave yet it stays, once it has the legs it then realizes it can now exist outside of the water.

No... they aren't...


What show? And it's wrong.


Oh really?

You must login or register to view this content.


That's not genetics.


1. No, there is already substantial evidence in favor of it to hold it up
2. How? Evolution doesn't state it has to change constantly...


That has absolutely nothing to do with evolution, but abiogenesis is likely.


That would completely prove evolution wrong! Evolution isn't choice, it's natural selection. Our tech is plenty satisfying to keep humanity where we are.


1. Wrong. Black pigments deal with UV rays better (sounds racist, but is true).


If that's what you think evolution is then I feel sad for you...

Here is a good example. Bacteria fossils found on mars... Why didnt those evolve into some other species? simple answer they cant since evolution is just a way for atheists to feel smart. evidence goes both ways but God is clearly real. Its not like they made jokes like that that long ago, not like there are like 100 books of the bible with similar information. countless scrolls telling stories of things jesus had done.

Darwins book didnt say shit about humans either. Most likely because he himself had no evidence of it ever happening so he creates pithecanthropus, which is so called real. Now lets talk about mutations. Say every set of bones just vanishes from this time except one set and this person was deformed and had lets say 7 fingers on each hand. would this mean that we clearly evolved to have 14 fingers and then they vanished somewhere between? They would assume we all had 14 fingers since they only found that one set of bones. Where are all the skeletons of pithecanthropus(homo erectus) The earth should be full of them but hell all they have found is something that for all we know is actually a monkey skull cap/ teeth. Not that much can be told from just those. Have you noticed how the modern apes and monkeys look similar to humans? For all we know those missing links are all just species of ape that died out and we cant find skulls or bones or anything from the modern ones from back then. since we cant find human bones it makes just as much sense(we find bones that are assumed to be human. No actual proof of this)

You should have used the Evilution page instead. This just makes the thread inconsistent because you begin with the evolution of humans and then you move on to giraffes.

YOU SAID IT DIDN'T EXIST!


One word... Natural Selection. They don't have it, because they don't need it to live!


-__- Once again, it deals with the sun's UV rays better.


Seriously, was this the point of the thread? To basically rag on people who accept evolution (Most doctors, biologists, etc...).


When the fuck did I say anything about god?