(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); So i saw some show about this and i was wondering what you guys all think.

My reasoning for this.

We supposedly evolved from monkeys or what ever, this could seem logical untill i ask you where all the missing links went. each link should be more fit for life according to the theory of evolution through natural selection so why did they all die out but the monkeys were left behind?.

idk how to spell it Coelocanth (that old fish thing) was supposed to be the missing link from fish to amphibians. there are no signs at all that this fish has evolved in any way at all.

No missing strings between giraffe and what ever it evolved from.... here is what i found on wiki


History and Orgin


The giant squid had no chance against the giraffe
It is believed by evolutionist scientists, that some million years ago Camelopard Girrafids evolved from tiny worm like creatures known as "Jim". (The Jim evolved from rocks, which evolved from water, which evolved from the nothing of the universe.) The CG's later evolved into Michael Jackson. Scientists have yet to find the missing link between Michael Jackson and Giraffe, and while some cling to this theory others conclude that the giraffe is actually the spawn of Michael Jackson's victims, and were some how conceived through the power of an anti-matter explosion during the act of "Surprise butt sex".
Giraffes almost became extinct in 1953 due to the 5 year ice-age that prevailed when Nelson Mandella farted. The population was halved by 1954. Luckily, due to the invention of the turtle neck in 1955, the population levels stabilized at 10,000 and have risen since. Turtles, however, have not fared as well.
The future of giraffes was put to the test when Noah would not let any of them into his ark. They managed to cut a deal with the unicorns, who traded 2 of their 6 places for an ancient giraffe cookie recipe. Of course, after the flood, the giraffes eliminated the unicorn species, in order to keep their recipe safe, which is still a well kept secret to this day. Giraffes are the only animal, apart from humans, that have wiped out an entire species of animal for entertainment purposes (the woolly mammoth in 1823 and the giant squid in 1967).
small ass dick that is black so do not be surprised about a small black cock..



Clearly that is alot but LOL ^^

anyways no links have been discovered of the giraffe so yeah... what you guys thnk?

I'm very literate, your thread is just crudely put together with copy and paste from You must login or register to view this content.. I support stealing as much as the next person, because my friend Spencer and I have nothing better to do with our afternoons than to browse Uncyclopedia and make fun of random junk. The problem is when you just copy and paste without even a thought of cleanup. With such hindsight in your efforts, the opening post is just a mess.

The moral of it all is - use transitions gracefully and clean up your posts.



It's pointless.
Reasoning: See above

If god is so clearly real why isn't there any real evidence for it? You can't mix faith with truth if there is no factual information behind what you are trying to say.

Second, Bacteria fossils on mars, simply enough they may not have been in the proper circumstances to actually evolve. Evolving is adaption to the environment. We adapt and change to adjust to the changes, why do you think so many species die out when there is a change in environment, those who had the ability to adapt survived while those who were unable to died.

The same principle applies to the bacteria on mars. Another thing, mars is dry on the outside, organisms require water to thrive, without it we die.

A book about written belief is not evidence. If you say something that someone wrote is evidence then you must also say that the giant spaghetti monster is real too. It is an established religion now, you can't be hypocritical and call it wrong even though it goes against everything your books says.

Now, Jesus was a Jewish. Why is it that the Jews don't believe in him to be the Messiah yet with newer religions they state him to be. Kinda seems flawed and who is to say that it isn't a story that was wide spread and told in different tongues before being written down. It being passed down by different people and translated, it means similar story and everything.

Now, if you also want to say it is truthful, shall I bring up the Romans and the Greeks and their belief in their gods "Athena, Hades, Ares" ect. They spoke of them to be real and believed them to be real, hell people still do. Now, you can't say that they are right and that you are right because you contradict yourself. If you say that they are wrong then you must open up belief that you are wrong as well.

Before you dare bother type another f*cking word against me, read up a little bit and stop being an ignorant f*cking ass trying to act like you actually know a thing or two.