Post: Did the US Government Cause 9/11?
Options
07-24-2012, 07:35 PM
#1
Andy Samberg
The Lonely Island
to all those lost in the 9/11 attacks, all of the replies in this thread are peoples opinions so sorry in advance if anybody finds anything offensive.The 9/11 Attacks are probably one of the most discussed Conspiracies to-date.
The main question I hear people asking about it is: Government or Terrorists?
Now, I don't actually have an opinion on this so I'm just going to say 50/50.
If you watch the footage of the buildings falling, you see that the 110 story building falls down to the ground, like a controlled explosion.
Also, if you look at the footage of the metal support beams, which make up the buildings structure, you can see that they have actually been sliced or burnt at an angle, causing the top half of the building to slide over the edge of the bottom half.
Here is the footage, and for those who wish not to view it, please do not open the spoiler.
Who do you think caused 9/11? Terrorists or Government, and Why?
The following user thanked Andy Samberg for this useful post:
..
07-24-2012, 07:55 PM
#3
blair
:carling:
Originally posted by Lovols
Before I start this thread: to all those lost in the 9/11 attacks, all of the replies in this thread are peoples opinions so sorry in advance if anybody finds anything offensive.
to all those lost in the 9/11 attacks, all of the replies in this thread are peoples opinions so sorry in advance if anybody finds anything offensive.
Government, dont know why just always seems to come up in these sort of debates
EDIT- What I dont understand is the second building was sitting fine one minute then the next it collapses in less than 10 seconds, also people who survived at the bottom said they heard explosions just before the plane crashed.
Whatever the truth is we will never find out
The following user thanked blair for this useful post:
07-24-2012, 07:58 PM
#4
DevouR
Guest
Of course they did.
IMO It was for $$$$
Insurance from building(s), money from war, your country being in national headlines = $$$$$$$$
> In the 70's the buildings suffered severe structural damage, and they knew it was going to collapse, so they blow it up
and blame it on 'Terrorists' knowing that most Americans were gullible enough to believe that.
> They'd get money (some how some way) from war, and money makes the world go round.
> They knew this were to make world headlines. There name in other peoples mouths = Them being popular.
> If you watch the video of it going down, it looks like it came from something other then a giant plane.
IMO It was for $$$$
Insurance from building(s), money from war, your country being in national headlines = $$$$$$$$
> In the 70's the buildings suffered severe structural damage, and they knew it was going to collapse, so they blow it up
and blame it on 'Terrorists' knowing that most Americans were gullible enough to believe that.
> They'd get money (some how some way) from war, and money makes the world go round.
> They knew this were to make world headlines. There name in other peoples mouths = Them being popular.
> If you watch the video of it going down, it looks like it came from something other then a giant plane.
The following user thanked DevouR for this useful post:
The following 3 users say thank you to elfmotat for this useful post:
07-24-2012, 08:09 PM
#7
Securing_Bravo
~ The Graphics Room ~
Yes, it was planned by the 'Illuminati'. It shows you.. it obviously wasn't the plane that knocked the towers down and it's quite clear. Yet they still get away with it.. so that means they can get away with anything. All the news (BBC etc) is what they want you to see and believe and what they want you to talk about. They own everything.
The following user thanked blair for this useful post:
07-24-2012, 09:43 PM
#10
Just4Hax
"I will speak ill of
I'm not gonna bother reading any comments above. This is about the... what 9th thread on 9/11 conspiracy?
No legitimate scientist or engineer agrees with the conspiracy. All evidence is attributed to amateur videos that are heavily editted and made by those who do not know the subject they are speaking on. If I remember correctly, elfmotat has actually completely refuted the statement once through an insane amount of evidence.
Aside from all evidence going against it, it logically doesn't make sense. The U.S. doesn't actually get that much oil from Iraq, we actually get the majority from Canada, along with the fact it actually hurt the economy. No economist would possibly have "okayed" an event like this.
Aside from then there being no reason for this to be done, or it factually being done. To suggest a demolition team went into the WTC while it was highly active, planted explosives, without anybody noticing, is ludacris.
No legitimate scientist or engineer agrees with the conspiracy. All evidence is attributed to amateur videos that are heavily editted and made by those who do not know the subject they are speaking on. If I remember correctly, elfmotat has actually completely refuted the statement once through an insane amount of evidence.
Aside from all evidence going against it, it logically doesn't make sense. The U.S. doesn't actually get that much oil from Iraq, we actually get the majority from Canada, along with the fact it actually hurt the economy. No economist would possibly have "okayed" an event like this.
Aside from then there being no reason for this to be done, or it factually being done. To suggest a demolition team went into the WTC while it was highly active, planted explosives, without anybody noticing, is ludacris.
The following 2 users say thank you to Just4Hax for this useful post:
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
