(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); First off, yes. I'm back. Long story short: I was banned by an admin and now I'm unbanned again.

My reason for returning to NGU is to post about some particular topics to the younger generations out there. Today's topic is how the United States Government is pulling nasty little tricks to secure a prying eye into the private sanctity of our beloved internet.

Be prepared. Because some of this may come off as "far fetched" or "conspiracy theory". I assure you that it's really happening.


Basically, The current administration under the puppet strings (The Obama administration) is using what are called You must login or register to view this content. to gain enough support to allow them to sign into effect legislature that would give them supreme control over content and privacy on the net.

Sound far fetched yet? Consider the recent shooting in Colorado, which was conveniently close to the signing of the Arms Trade Treaty and The Obama administration's public comments about "demonizing" the second amendment (our right to own weapons).

The details can be found if you dig through the articles I'm going to post here, but it's very simple. They are trying to pin "cyber attacks" on middle eastern terrorists. Specifically? You guessed it. Muslims. Where? Iran. It was a while ago that I read about it, but there was alarming evidence that "anonymous" has even been used to try to get people scared enough to want the government policing the web.

The reason I'm posting this isn't just to scare people or hope people say "that's bullshit!". No, instead I want you to just be aware about what is going on. Understand that there will be fake "cyber attacks" and that it will greatly effect your freedom to use the internet and not be spied on while doing so. Remember SOPA? This is SOPA on fucking steroids.

Below are the articles. I will just paste them here along with a video because I know you're too lazy to click links and read, let alone read any of this anyways. Thanks if you did.



From: You must login or register to view this content.


The Obama administration is considering issuing an executive order to achieve some of the aims of the Cybersecurity Act, which died in the Senate in August.

“Following congressional inaction, the President is determined to use existing executive branch authorities to protect our nation against cyber threats,” John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, wrote in a letter to Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. “Specifically, we are exploring an Executive Order to direct executive branch departments and agencies to secure our nation’s critical infrastructure by working with the private sector.”

TechDirt last week published what it claimed was a draft version of the executive order.


The draft proposes an information sharing system between private companies and the federal government regarding cybersecurity threats.

The vague proposal would put the Department of Homeland Security in charge of implementing the new cybersecurity apparatus, which aims to protect so-called “critical infrastructure” from Internet-based attacks.

President Barack Obama had threatened to veto the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) over privacy and civil liberty concerns. The President later backed the Senate’s Cybersecurity Act, which included more privacy protections than CISPA.

Unlike the Cybersecurity Act, the draft of the executive order does not contain provisions related to protecting Americans’ privacy.


From: You must login or register to view this content.

With President Obama ready to sign an executive order to control the Internet in the name of cyber security, could it be more obvious that this “cyber attack” is a total set up? Especially since all versions of Internet control legislation have failed to pass in normal government channels bothdomestically and internationally.
Are we expected to believe that sophisticated Muslim hacktivists attacked US banks because they were angry about a movie that was produced in America? That’d be like attacking Afghanistan or Iraq after 15 Saudis supposedly attacked us, ohh wait…that did happen.
Is this really the best story they can come up with? It was so predictable that it makes it that much more laughable. But the motive being pinned on the pathetic anti-Muslim movie is the real kicker.
It’s sad to see Richard Clark in the video above actually take this seriously. Talk about an establishment sellout.
I call major bullshit on this story. It stinks to high heaven. What do you think?



Video:

i was on facebook and saw a Politcal Ad. Reported it as Misleading :lol:

Of course they are from Iran....more justification to launch another 10 year war on Nov 10th if Obama gets reelected. Power hungry liberal. "My bill fails in the Senate, :ha!: I'll just use an executive order to pass it anyways!"

What ever happened to a President being of the people?

Been a long time since a President being of the people... I recommend people stock up on ammo. Just in-case someone gets reelected. Personally the Government is to big..

Yeah been 50 years (JFK) and he was killed by an inside job.

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government."

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first."

-Thomas Jefferson

It's been way longer than that. All the problems for the US started around 1913 when the Federal Reserve was created. But the psychopathic global domination scheme has been handed down through power families throughout history. We are only now slowly starting to see all of it come to fruition.

Take a look at the seemingly mirrored policies between our current status and Germany 1938. It's alarming.

This is why i'm leaving this earth to my moon base, i got 3 spots left in my ship who's coming with me?

Sort of. JFK was definitely a people's president and that's why he was killed. But I agree, besides him, you have to look back 100+ years.

I'll look into that. I know the gov't won't dare to try to seize our weapons though.

Why do you have to go to the moon? Why not just leave the country? :confused:

Because it's not just America. :|