(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); First off, yes. I'm back. Long story short: I was banned by an admin and now I'm unbanned again.

My reason for returning to NGU is to post about some particular topics to the younger generations out there. Today's topic is how the United States Government is pulling nasty little tricks to secure a prying eye into the private sanctity of our beloved internet.

Be prepared. Because some of this may come off as "far fetched" or "conspiracy theory". I assure you that it's really happening.


Basically, The current administration under the puppet strings (The Obama administration) is using what are called You must login or register to view this content. to gain enough support to allow them to sign into effect legislature that would give them supreme control over content and privacy on the net.

Sound far fetched yet? Consider the recent shooting in Colorado, which was conveniently close to the signing of the Arms Trade Treaty and The Obama administration's public comments about "demonizing" the second amendment (our right to own weapons).

The details can be found if you dig through the articles I'm going to post here, but it's very simple. They are trying to pin "cyber attacks" on middle eastern terrorists. Specifically? You guessed it. Muslims. Where? Iran. It was a while ago that I read about it, but there was alarming evidence that "anonymous" has even been used to try to get people scared enough to want the government policing the web.

The reason I'm posting this isn't just to scare people or hope people say "that's bullshit!". No, instead I want you to just be aware about what is going on. Understand that there will be fake "cyber attacks" and that it will greatly effect your freedom to use the internet and not be spied on while doing so. Remember SOPA? This is SOPA on fucking steroids.

Below are the articles. I will just paste them here along with a video because I know you're too lazy to click links and read, let alone read any of this anyways. Thanks if you did.



From: You must login or register to view this content.


The Obama administration is considering issuing an executive order to achieve some of the aims of the Cybersecurity Act, which died in the Senate in August.

“Following congressional inaction, the President is determined to use existing executive branch authorities to protect our nation against cyber threats,” John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, wrote in a letter to Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. “Specifically, we are exploring an Executive Order to direct executive branch departments and agencies to secure our nation’s critical infrastructure by working with the private sector.”

TechDirt last week published what it claimed was a draft version of the executive order.


The draft proposes an information sharing system between private companies and the federal government regarding cybersecurity threats.

The vague proposal would put the Department of Homeland Security in charge of implementing the new cybersecurity apparatus, which aims to protect so-called “critical infrastructure” from Internet-based attacks.

President Barack Obama had threatened to veto the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) over privacy and civil liberty concerns. The President later backed the Senate’s Cybersecurity Act, which included more privacy protections than CISPA.

Unlike the Cybersecurity Act, the draft of the executive order does not contain provisions related to protecting Americans’ privacy.


From: You must login or register to view this content.

With President Obama ready to sign an executive order to control the Internet in the name of cyber security, could it be more obvious that this “cyber attack” is a total set up? Especially since all versions of Internet control legislation have failed to pass in normal government channels bothdomestically and internationally.
Are we expected to believe that sophisticated Muslim hacktivists attacked US banks because they were angry about a movie that was produced in America? That’d be like attacking Afghanistan or Iraq after 15 Saudis supposedly attacked us, ohh wait…that did happen.
Is this really the best story they can come up with? It was so predictable that it makes it that much more laughable. But the motive being pinned on the pathetic anti-Muslim movie is the real kicker.
It’s sad to see Richard Clark in the video above actually take this seriously. Talk about an establishment sellout.
I call major bullshit on this story. It stinks to high heaven. What do you think?



Video:

Why would Obama want to jeopardize his 2nd term with this nonsense?

You're kidding, right? The are trying incessantly to seize citizens' weapons.

Look up Operation "Fast and Furious" and read about that whole fiasco. And then also the Colorado shooting, which was extremely transparent and a set-up. It's all ways to "demonize" the 2nd amendment and make people think guns are bad, and want to have them banned as a result. And it's working.

In California they are trying to pass Senate Bill 249, which changes the law on assault rifles and will make a huge percent of rifles currently owned illegal. The firearms will have to be surrendered over to police. That's why I want un-registered guns. Mine are registered, but they aren't illegal assault rifles. If they were, after SB249 passes (if it does), I would have to surrender them. That's bullshit. We aren't the UK. Americans fought and died for the right to own weapons so that in the event that we have to fight against an invading force or even our own government, we have a chance.