Post: do u belive in evolution
09-23-2009, 03:37 PM #1
mitchell865
███Awesome faceUBSTEP███
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); i dont belive in evolution but try not to slander anybody here or hate for what they belive just be nice
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
09-24-2009, 08:48 PM #20
THE_JoKeR
Everyday I'm Hustlin
Mitchel how old are you like 12?
09-24-2009, 09:18 PM #21
Dandyman2
The Only Krazy
the only people that don't are bunch of bible bashing ****s. sorry if i offended you but it's true.
09-24-2009, 09:25 PM #22
EliteAccuracy
Pokemon Trainer
One of the many reasons evolution is false, look at birds

The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless? The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense.
09-24-2009, 09:42 PM #23
Default Avatar
_____
Guest
absolutely awful counter example to evolution and im sorry but if you had a debate between a minister and an evolutionary scientist, the minister would get completely demolished because all you creationists have to base you theories on are complete speculation about all the made up stories in the bible.
09-24-2009, 09:43 PM #24
elfmotat
Rᵤᵥ - ½gᵤᵥR ∝ Tᵤᵥ
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
One of the many reasons evolution is false, look at birds

The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws.


Such as? I can answer any question you have as to the evolution of the tree if you want me to.

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists.


Really? Because I was under the pretense that that question has been answered for years, but if you say so. [/sarcasm]

The dinosaur developed feathers first (mostly raptors), and the ability of flight came when the swiping motion of most raptors met with thicker feathers. Google is your friend Smile.

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless?


You're making the assumption that it came from a stump, when in fact it evolved from the arms of raptor dinosaurs.

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment.


I'd say the ability of flight has a few advantages, wouldn't you?

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless?


You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species.


Yes, you've said that already.

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers.


Um, no. That is literally wrong on every level. Where'd you learn this crap, Kent Hovind?

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly.


Well, it's seems you're wrong then, considering that they CAN fly.

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees.


WTF?!?!?!?!

Originally posted by EliteAccuracy View Post
The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense.


You have it in reverse, the arms became wings... over millions of years. They didn't just decide to grow wings one day :rolleyes:.

The following 2 users say thank you to elfmotat for this useful post:

Como, H₂O
09-24-2009, 10:00 PM #25
Como
Here's to Loonyology!
^^^Elfmotat just teared your theory/arguement apart my friend. I think you need to go back to the drawing board....
09-24-2009, 10:16 PM #26
EliteAccuracy
Pokemon Trainer
yeah he tore my argument up by typing Wtf and saying its nonsense without backing it up with proof. Creationism and Evolution are both theories, Creationism is just as credible as Creationism until it has been proven. Please find me a fossil link that is proven to be a devolved human, yeah there is none they are all hoaxes.

And if its so hard to understand, Im talking about the flightless in my argument but I expected too much common sense from you sorry.

I gtg so I'll leave a few questions you evolutionists can answer, dont stare at the screen too long looking for an answer through evolution, you might hurt yourself.


1. Where has macro evolution ever been observed? What's the mechanism for getting new complexity such as new vital organs? How, for example, could a caterpillar evolve into a butterfly?

2. Where are the billions of transitional fossils that should be there if your theory is right? Billions! Not a handful of questionable transitions. Why don't we see a reasonably smooth continuum among all living creatures, or in the fossil record, or both?

3. Who are the evolutionary ancestors of the insects? The evolutionary tree that's in the textbook: where's its trunk and where are its branches?

4. What evidence is there that information, such as that in DNA, could ever assemble itself? What about the 4000 books of coded information that are in a tiny part of each of your 100 trillion cells? If astronomers received an intelligent radio signal from some distant galaxy, most people would conclude that it came from an intelligent source. Why then doesn't the vast information sequence in the DNA molecule of just a bacteria also imply an intelligent source?

5. How could organs as complicated as the eye or the ear or the brain of even a tiny bird ever come about by chance or natural processes? How could a bacterial motor evolve?

6. If the solar system evolved, why do three planets spin backwards? Why do at least 6 moons revolve backwards?

7. Why do we have comets if the solar system is billions of years old?

8. Where did all the helium go?

9. How did sexual reproduction evolve?

10. If the big bang occurred, where did all the information around us and in us come from? Has an explosion ever produced order? Or as Sir Isaac Newton said, "Who wound up the clock?"

11. Why do so many of the earth's ancient cultures have flood legends?

12. Where did matter come from? What about space, time, energy, and even the laws of physics?

13. How did the first living cell begin? That's a greater miracle than for a bacteria to evolve to a man. How did that first cell reproduce?

14. Just before life appeared, did the atmosphere have oxygen or did it not have oxygen?

15. Why aren't meteorites found in supposedly old rocks?

16. If it takes intelligence to make an arrowhead, why doesn't it take vastly more intelligence to create a human? Do you really believe that hydrogen will turn into people if you wait long enough?

17. Which came first, DNA or the proteins needed by DNA--which can only be produced by DNA?
09-25-2009, 12:04 AM #27
NanuGama
YouTube.com/NanuGama
I Believe We Will Go Through Another Evolution Around 2012.
09-25-2009, 02:03 AM #28
I personally believe in evolution, but I also believe God made the first organisms that evolved.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo