Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
One of the many reasons evolution is false, look at birds
The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws.
Such as? I can answer any question you have as to the evolution of the tree if you want me to.
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists.
Really? Because I was under the pretense that that question has been answered for years, but if you say so. [/sarcasm]
The dinosaur developed feathers first (mostly raptors), and the ability of flight came when the swiping motion of most raptors met with thicker feathers. Google is your friend

.
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless?
You're making the assumption that it came from a stump, when in fact it evolved from the arms of raptor dinosaurs.
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment.
I'd say the ability of flight has a few advantages, wouldn't you?
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless?
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species.
Yes, you've said that already.
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers.
Um, no. That is literally wrong on every level. Where'd you learn this crap, Kent Hovind?
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly.
Well, it's seems you're wrong then, considering that they CAN fly.
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees.
WTF?!?!?!?!
Originally posted by EliteAccuracy
The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense.
You have it in reverse, the arms became wings... over millions of years. They didn't just decide to grow wings one day :rolleyes:.