(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I was informed via radio yesterday,that the NCAA has now created a rule that if,a player illegally hits another player,he will be ejected from the game.
My thoughts on the new rule are,I think it is a great rule to have.The safety of the game would increase by amazing proportions,allowing great players from college to make it in the pros. With the amount of concussions/season ending injuries coming off illegal hits,most players in the NCAA are dropping from a 1st round pick to a 3rd or 4th round pick (which still isn't terrible).
IF a player commits a illegal hit near the end of the game,they will sit out the rest of that game and the next too. Many people will say "What happens if a player is thrown out,that wasn't supposed to be?". This will be treated like any other game changing calls. An example being the touchdown call during the Packers vs Seahawks game a year ago.

Give me your thoughts on this new rule I would love to hear them.

While I understand why the rule was made I don't like it for one reason. My understanding of it is if this rule was in place then that hit Clowney had on that Michigan RB would have got him ejected and that isn't right. On a play like that you are punishing the defensive player for the offenses mistake and that just shouldn't happen.

would love to see the rule in the NFL as well

It's tough to enforce these types of rules, any rule that involves this amount of judgement I am against. Now if you can take away the judgement factor in this I'd be fine. Meaning only obvious illegal hits such as the crackback block above I'm all for it. The thing is I don't want a safety getting thrown out of a game for a hit to the helmet of the receiver when the receiver is the one that lowered his head. Overall, it's a good idea, but I don't think it can be added. NFL has strayed a way from these kind of judgement calls, so in the end I think it would have to be tinkered with before being added.