Originally posted by ThatPrettyMOFO
Actually Cod and BF are no where near realistic at all, In BF it takes half a magazine to kill someone, Same with Cod. In real life it takes one bullet. BF is based off US Marines, All Marines mainly use single Fire but sometimes 3 burst is used but mainly only single fire. Saying one is more realistic than the other is like saying because i play cod and battlefield, im a warrior/soldier and served time in iraq or where ever the game is based.
Lold. The last sentence killed me haha, it's too true. Hell I've been playing Battlefield since BF1942 on OS X back in 2003 lol. And saying one is more realistic than the other is really retarded. Comparing any first person shooter to a degree of realism just shows that the individual who made that remark hasn't seen combat or knows anyone who's seen combat.
But at the end of the day I still prefer Battlefield over CoD. The larger maps, 64 man servers, shit blowing up 24/7 and overall craziness. DICE does a great job encapsulating blitzkrieg and putting it into their games.