(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); You must login or register to view this content.

made for a battle with _dep, C&C would be Lovley!

You must login or register to view this content.


V2 is way better imo but whatta yall think?

That is very very well made.I like it a lot.

Thanks man, i was begining to worrie, no one was posting on it, i was startign to think it was horrible

I Would Very Much Like to Penatrate That Sig :p. . . .

First one is better. You can see the hand effects better, the colors are more vivid, although the second one does well. Also, WTF NO TEXT? You need to work on adding some text! Even a small size 9 pixel font with a 1px black border and opaque set to very low and having the text hidden somewhere, would be decent.

You NEED your watermark on your sigs man. Just to cover your own ass if you ever run into a douche bag that rips your sig.

meh, im not realy worried about somone ripping them, if they do oh well, they wil lknow they didnt make it, who cares if they actuly fool somone els

It's your footprint on the painting man. What if all the great artist didn't put their signature on their paintings, we wouldn't know what painting belonged to who. We would have Joe Bob trying to lay claim on Vahn Gough's work.

Aule: If van Gogh didn't put his signature on one of his paintings, we'd know it was his because we'd know his style.

Also, no text beats having something like your tag, where the text just ruins everything.

lol if i were only half the artist as him... but i get ur point, but when i add text it always kills my tag.

This is just a quick 3 min job(havent touched photoshop in awhile, since cs3)

You must login or register to view this content.

Text helps fill space that seems empty. Notice it's there, but it doesn't take the focal point away from the rest of the sig.