Could Mw2 have been a "silent rebellion" from Infinity Ward this whole time? Think about it for a second.
Everyone knows Mw2 is a really unbalanced game. Overpowered grenade launchers, boosting, and tactical insertions, UMP 45, certain killstreaks. I can go on and on but lets end the list there. But it's not just the multiplayer that's messed up.
The story plot also leaves a lot of questions.
Originally posted by another user
Price survived? How did he get captured? What the **** is up with Shepherd? He was in cahoots with Makarov, then he backstabbed Makarov? How did he manage all that without being caught?
There's just too many flaws. Could IW have done this all on purpose to rebel Activision, or does that sound too far fetched? Comment below.
Source: You must login or register to view this content.
The game is a good game, don't get how some people have the courage to argue and say that "Oh, ump wrecked the game" while on the other hand they go in a snd and host an online cl put god mode on and go kill everybody, I think its simple, if you like the game play it, if you dont the shut up and dont say anything about it, others like it, its a matter of opinion. I like it myself.
That's crazy. Honestly Melo, there's really no need to use gaming websites for opinion pieces like this - otherwise all you really are doing is changing a few words around.
Back to the point, that's such a silly suggestion as it wasn't a crap game. It got 9 out of 10 on IGN (if not higher, not sure) for a reason; it's an excellent game - just wasn't made for the 'hardcore' player, it was made so that new players to the game can jump on and do well.
Most people who bought the game thought it was brilliant, I know this because I've spoke to the countless amount of people I know who bought it as their first CoD. But the minute communities of gaming forums and YouTube saw it as a terrible game because we are the ones who are so serious about gaming that we even go the internet to talk about it.
That's crazy. Honestly Melo, there's really no need to use gaming websites for opinion pieces like this - otherwise all you really are doing is changing a few words around.
Back to the point, that's such a silly suggestion as it wasn't a crap game. It got 9 out of 10 on IGN (if not higher, not sure) for a reason; it's an excellent game - just wasn't made for the 'hardcore' player, it was made so that new players to the game can jump on and do well.
Most people who bought the game thought it was brilliant, I know this because I've spoke to the countless amount of people I know who bought it as their first CoD. But the minute communities of gaming forums and YouTube saw it as a terrible game because we are the ones who are so serious about gaming that we even go the internet to talk about it.
Yeah but after reading that article it had me thinking about all this IW drama and I have to agree with most the points