Post: Call Of Duty: XP Attendees Receive MW3 Hardened Edition Free
08-04-2011, 09:14 PM #1
Default Avatar
x iJB x
Guest
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Call Of Duty: XP Attendees Receive MW3 Hardened Edition Free
Source: You must login or register to view this content. // By: x iJB x // 04/08/2011

You must login or register to view this content.


Activision has today amazed gamers worldwide by telling the world that all attendees to it's Call Of Duty: XP event will be receiving a voucher to pick up the hardened edition of Modern Warfare 3 for free.

Ticket holders to the event will receive a code that will allow them to redeem a free copy of the hardened edition of the game, set to launch on 8th November. However, Activision has not commented on how exactly this will work.

Activision also gave details on the Call Of Duty: Elite live action series which is currently still in development.

The convention will also have other great features such as the chance to play on a reconstructed map of Scrapyard from Modern Warfare 2, with paintball guns, and also a $1 million MW3 tournament.

Tickets to the two-day convention will cost $150, with all money raised going towards the You must login or register to view this content..
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 2 users say thank you to x iJB x for this useful post:

IL--U--IK--IE, WiKKiD
08-05-2011, 09:16 AM #29
Kylee.
Banned
Originally posted by Zynx View Post
Ok the company is not what matters it's the gameplay, have you noticed that all the COD in the past have been exactly the same? Same type of gameplay only in a different design.

Now compare that to Battlefield 3, realism is the main goal which they have achieved and epic gameplay on a wide variety of huge-scaled maps.

Compare MW3 to MW2, they are exactly the same, same graphics and similar gameplay. Spec Ops is just a InfinityWard version of zombies. Treyarch ruined the COD series with Black Ops.

Just because BF3 is only 30fps on consoles still doesn't mean it won't be great, it is 60fps on PC.
not all COD's have been the same, how can you compare the things on COD4 to COD5,6,7? they are different.. they are simulare, but they are suppost to be, thats why they are all named Call of Duty:


anyway, now we know why the tickets are so dear.
08-05-2011, 09:49 AM #30
EZ.
< ^ > < ^ >
:lol: More Fanboy flame wars - I'm a gamer not a fanboy so here is my take on it - sorry for getting off topic but everyone is off topic already so w/e -Ok so first of all i hate fanboys although when i see a fanboy flame i defend the flamed game and it makes me look like a fanboy but that's not the case i like all games, i'm open to anything so i find these "wars" ridiculous. So in reply to the first post who "claims" he didn't want to start a war, well that's bs iv'e seen you bash MW3 a lot! you're obviously a BF fanboy and you'll have to accept that. And a message for anyone flaming anything .... honestly stfu if you don't like the game why talk about it? It's funny but gets annoying when these wars start. Here's how i see it, how good a game is depends on the viewers opinion, i don't give a shit if you think pong is better then MGS4 it's your opinion so it's a fact to you same thing goes with people who like BF3 better and think it's a better game that only applies with you and visa versa with MW3 Fanboys. BF3 is a good game so is MW3, but it all depends which is your cup of tea and for me that would have to be COD. Why? Because i love the fast paced gameplay but i will be playing BF too but obviously not as much because it would probably bore me, as all battlefield games do after a week. Now to the BF fanboys here are my replies to your stupid comments ----- It looks the same! .... No shit, it's not going to switch from MW2 Graphics to god like graphics and whoever plays for graphics cant call themselves a gamer. It could just be DLC ..... no comment your probably brain damaged. It's unrealistic ....... again you are brain damaged since when are game realistic if i want realism ill join the army. No here are my responses to MW3 fanboys idiotic comments --- It's boring and takes so long to get kills .... no shit it's supposed to be a sort of war simulator. I can't kill whore :fa: .... no shit once again. I got 0-10 every game .... then you suck ass, this isn't MW find a different strat. Also last thing is to a remark the reporter said something like "BF will always be cods shadow" and a lot of people groaned it yet it is true although his reasons were not valid. This is the way i see it MW is Mickey D's and BF is burger king - they both taste great and basically equal but Burger King will never EVER! get more popular then Mc Donald's. Why? Because more people prefer McDonald's style over BK. ~ EZ.

The following user thanked EZ. for this useful post:

TheBurntCeltic
08-05-2011, 10:15 AM #31
Kells
ngujonas.blogspot.com
Well, I rather spend 150$ on the prestige edition. And whatever comes with, I may sell it on eBay or something =D
08-05-2011, 10:18 AM #32
joshblake8808
Super Premium
call of duty will always be better than battlefield becuase it has better things in the game that make it better like the
surroundings and the guns but Black Ops yes that was a crap game and it spoiled the call of duty series but it was only crap so i think mw3 will be better than bf3
08-05-2011, 11:02 AM #33
Axiom
PC Gamer
Originally posted by x
"Compare MW3 to MW2". Bit hard considering it isn't out. And it may be similar but it's definitely not the same.



My experience with Battlefield is how you describe your feelings towards CoD. Everyone wants to go lone wolf. Not that I'm against that, it's the style I normally play myself, in TDM only though. At least CoD players work in teams on team-based games (if everyone has a mic), BF players all tend to be like "Fuk dis shit am goin commando to take dem ****as out, back in 5 k?"


I'd still say that BF is more of a team game. If you have a good squad, with all microphones, it can be best/most fun the team play ever. Snipers covering the back and spotting enemies, Medics suppressing fire, engineers taking out the tanks etc, seems a little more "team-based" than CoDs run about shoot-everyone. Don't get me wrong, I loved CoD4, CoD5 and everything, it was just after that the whole aim of Call of Duty was lost to 7 year old Americans shouting down their microphones, only caring about quick-scopes, no-scopes and 360s. I suppose it's up to people's personal opinions, but all this shit about how BF3 is only 30 FPS and IW are using that against them, that's shit, 30FPS is perfectly playable and the only reason it is 30FPS on consoles is that they just can't handle it.

BF for the realism, war and massive maps. MW3 for the fun, fast-paced shoot-em-up.
08-05-2011, 11:03 AM #34
Laney
Ex-Staff
Originally posted by .AcidHavoc View Post
Not tryna start any flame war or anything.... But this is my opinion.

They are All just doing this because they know that BF3 will be better....
Again, this was just my opinion. :\



let the flame war begin

The following user groaned Laney for this awful post:

oHai My Name Is
08-05-2011, 11:07 AM #35
Gaia
Former Staff
This idea just seems so stupid, it just makes me think about Activison being greedier, as if you guys are gonna buy this game even though it's made by IW :dumb:. They're either to dumb to patch these hacks/cl, they can't afford better security or they're to lazy to spend a small portion of their money on better security :dumb: and an extra :dumb: cause it's Activision. :dumb: for IW. :dumb: for that bald fuk.
08-05-2011, 03:00 PM #36
Ill just go the ASDA at midnight and get it for £30 :fyea:
08-05-2011, 03:22 PM #37
thee3nd
xcal fanboi
if only cali weren't so damn far away... :(

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo