I'm glad that BF3 won, but MW3 should have won in Single Player tbh.
And Legaljuona, quit groaning everyone, why you come to BF3 section just to groan everyone.
In all honesty. The MW3 campaign should have won, not because it was a good campaign, but because Battlefield 3's campaign was just uninteresting and lackluster.
shut up fanboy and btw what are u doing in bf3 section go back 2 ur bull shit game and we ve got what u call gravity it takes some skills to make a shot in bf3 bc2 get lost
Your making us BFvets look bad to the CoD noobs. :carling:
Originally posted by Spartan
it takes some skills i played bf3 it takes no skill sorry
Both games take some skill to play. You probably lonewolfing around or something.
how is it bullshit ? yea they out sold doesn't mean the game is better. have you even seen all the threads and all the articles that show that mw3 is crap . oh wait I know this because I own both games and I know for a fact mw3 sucks but it out sold , yea i know and that's why it looks like mw2.5 because activision knows they can make a crap game and all you lil kids who love the franchise will go out and buy it in drones. when people played it in the xp event and told us who didn't that it looked just like mw2.5 then we all saw the trailers and most of us pointed out these FACT but no you fanboys kept telling us to stfu and so forth and now look at the game you were praising and defending so much , lag up the ass , always have to have assassin perk on due to uav's and even the kid who never ever played a cod game can get a stealth bomber and a emp just by collecting kills not by going on a streak but just getting enough kills gives this noob an emp , yea mw3 did outsell BF3 but that doesn't mean it better or more fun
---------- Post added at 11:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:57 AM ----------
Originally posted by Spartan
Originally posted by LOKOTE
it takes some skills
i played bf3 it takes no skill sorry
The following user groaned Ameht! for this awful post:
it takes some skills
i played bf3 it takes no skill sorry
please go jump off a bridge...
Don't get me wrong i have both games and love both of them. I would have to say bf3 takes more skill you cant just camp in a corner the whole game for 2 reasons 1 the maps are to big and 2 the objective keeps moving. Sniping actually realistic with drop and timing. Last is i beat the game on veteran in about 5 hours, Bf3 i haven't played the campaign as much but its alot more difficult. I do think from what i played from both mw3 campaign was better though had a good story to it. Multiplayer wise i can play both for hours and not get board. They both have there own factors that make them who they are. Bf3=realism Mw3= more of an arcadey fast paced gameplay. It greats really anoying when fanboys getting mad over a game. How bout this you go outside for once and make irl friends and stop worrying about what games better. i have had bfbc:1/2, Bf3 and every call of duty since finest hour. Finish it off you could compare them fully.
I have both games and YOU CANNOT ****ING COMPARE THEM.
Both games are entirely different, COD is more of an arcade lone wolf gaming with fun simple short game modes, while BF3 is more of a tank-Helicopter real war environment with team work based modes.
It's like comparing an apple to an orange, both taste good, but the taste is way different, hence they cannot be compared.
The following user thanked Vaner for this useful post: