(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The two games are worlds apart, I do think that MW3 campaign was better than the BF3 campaign. Both games have never really had a really amazing single player campaign but I think MW3 had the best one in the series so far.

Are you blind or something? Just asking.

Please look at the gameplays. If you tell me they don't even look remotely the same, I don't think I'm the blind one.

They are not COMPLETELY DIFFERENT games.

Edit: Here


Sure Mw2 and Mw3 are more similar, but that's because they take place hours apart. How different do you expect them to be?

You must login or register to view this content.

dude by your same reason then your nuts. yes mw2 and mw3 takes hours from each other , but BFBC2 is NOT BF2 go compare BF2 to BF3 that's like comparing w@W with MW2 your nuts man , and you can see the difference in the game , tanks , guns , choppers are all refined and defined . game-play is totally different , from going prone to how each class are different. medics are now assault and snipers don't have mortars , dude your seriously blinded to the entire situation because it seems you don't know from first hand experience and just going on with what the cod fan boys say . point being your DEAD WRONG

plus look at the video that you yourself posted. look at the graphics. yes mw2 and mw3 are the same story hours apart but the game was made with 2 years difference , where is the graphics upgrade , where is the engine upgrade? where is there anything different ? oh yea i know , now there is no kill streak and any noob who gets enough kills can get a stealth bomber and a freaking e.m.p , yea I'm sorry most of us have both games and we who have both games know which one is more better looking , which one plays better online and which one is more fun

..

:yuno: like?