(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); The votes are in..



Nice to see Dice bragging about that :lol:

lol no it's not. cod is just plain stupid bullshit. the WHOLE thing.

I ain't here to argue but thats my opinion. I think that MW had a better campaign series. If BF3 develops a sequel or two, then yea BF is gonna win that part. But this is Battlefield's first campaign. (not including the spin offs of Modern Combat and Bad company)

No, this isn't Battlefield's first campaign. Modern Combat and Bad Company are included, and let's not forget Battlefield 1942. The game is just all around better than the COD games in every way. The difference is like Stereo vs Mono.

COD's campaigns are super hollywood fantasy style whereas Battlefield is full of things that seem more believable and realistic.

Battlefield 3 is a 3 part series too...hence the 3!!!!!!!

No doubt that BF3's campaign is more believable and way more realistic. But bad company and modern combat didn't feel like battlefield. 1942 was good but if i remember correctly it wast a story campaign, just battle after battle. This is the first time battlefield left the door open for a sequel other than bad company.

---------- Post added at 11:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 PM ----------


true but Battlefield 3 has no relation to 1942 or battlefield 2.

Yeessssss!