Originally posted by Clutch
Okay, here goes...
Don't jets already have something similar in terms of rockets? Regardless, napalm is a good idea.
No. There's a reason for balance that the pilot doesn't have any weapons and it's because it's primarily a transport chopper. Don't make it OP.
I was disappointed to find the last recon unlock wasn't along the lines of a 50 cal even if it did look similar, so I approve. Although to whoever in the first page suggested paying money to unlock guns, f*ck off
As long as they look good and not too arcade-y (I'm looking at you CoD) then I'd be up for that.
No. The MG on that chopper is very deadly and it's agile to pilot as it is, this would make it OP.
If it's balanced in a similar way to how it has been in the recent patch for other weapons, then sure. Slow zoom-in should balance it though IMO.
No. Stop trying to break the balance.
Originally posted by another user
Don't jets already have something similar in terms of rockets? Regardless, napalm is a good idea.
Rockets are nothing like bombs. That's a crazy statement. Bombs were in BF1942 and BF2, so why not in BF3? Bombs are the sole anti-ground weapon equipped on a fighter jet.
Originally posted by another user
No. There's a reason for balance that the pilot doesn't have any weapons and it's because it's primarily a transport chopper. Don't make it OP.
The pilot needs something to defend himself. Gunners don't get kills, it's that simple. Transport choppers in real wars will always have something the pilot can use to defend himself. The transport chopper is hardly agile, slow, and big. It's already a flying bull's eye. It would not be over powered.
Originally posted by another user
I was disappointed to find the last recon unlock wasn't along the lines of a 50 cal even if it did look similar, so I approve. Although to whoever in the first page suggested paying money to unlock guns, f*ck off
.50cal. :love:
Originally posted by another user
As long as they look good and not too arcade-y (I'm looking at you CoD) then I'd be up for that.
They would be simple color schemes. Default, dark green, black, brown, tan, and dark blue.
Originally posted by another user
No. The MG on that chopper is very deadly and it's agile to pilot as it is, this would make it OP.
Then the Tunguska needs to be NERFED. The Little Bird has NOTHING to defend itself with against a Tunguska. I saw a guy go 79-0 sitting in a Tunguska ALL GAME. Rockets wouldn't be overpowered, they do like 5% damage each against vehicles. A 14 hit strafe only disables the vehicle.
Originally posted by another user
If it's balanced in a similar way to how it has been in the recent patch for other weapons, then sure. Slow zoom-in should balance it though IMO.
No, it would be the same zoom-in as other scopes. You can only get a OSK to the head, so in no way is it some overpowered gamebreaking scope. A Sniper is disadvantaged to every other class anyways.
Originally posted by another user
No. Stop trying to break the balance.
So a 200 round M249 firing 900rpm isn't unbalanced compared to a 20 round SCAR-H firing 600rpm? Jesus Christ, what's 20 or so extra rounds going to do? You would have to use up an attachment slot too!