Below are several quotes from you.
The first one you make a very generalized statement of how ignorant people are and how they cannot understand the laws of abstract collections. Then you abruptly end that thought and merge into one attempting to outline my mental capacity. Here is where your generalized statement takes form of a personal attack.
At least, it is logical to assume, based on the structure of your sentences, that you had the intentions of labeling me as ignorant and unintelligent.
Originally posted by privateuser3250
...but what does change the law is ignorance and one day they will make it so that copyright applies even when no sale has occurred, because people are too ignorant to understand the real law now and it wont even be televised.
and i didnt dance around the definition. maybe you lack the skills to understand what i said.
__________________________________________
Originally posted by privateuser3250
Piracy is when you sell copyright material.
IF IT'S NOT SOLD IT'S NOT PIRACY!
HOW CAN I BE ANY CLEARER?
I've been clear from the start and I've not made any personal attacks.
Originally posted by privateuser3250
Currency is highly relevant because that's the law, why don't you actually look up the law yourself and not rely on second hand information.
Either your challenge on my intelligence is accurate or you may be contradicting yourself here.
You demand that people inform themselves instead of allowing others to tell them what the truth is. I can appreciate that and will side with you on that, no problem. However, you suggest that people [in this case myself] should find evidence that supports the claim that they wish to make.
Originally posted by privateuser3250
"IF IT'S NOT SOLD IT'S NOT PIRACY!
HOW CAN I BE ANY CLEARER?"
Originally posted by privateuser3250
"...not rely on second hand information."
I simply do not understand the logic you present to me and to others when you say these things.
Unless if you are the essence of contract law then I'm not so sure that you are at liberty to declare yourself evidence. And through a loose translation of your own example, you are defined as second hand information.
To end this ridiculous waste of time with you, Sony or "Fony" had full legal obligations to end the rights of Other OS. Perhaps you should do some research yourself on security issues from the PS3 console, before making such a claim.
Good day privateuser3250, I wish you the best in your crusade against "The MAN" or "Big Brother". LOL!