(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Ok lets start. Sometimes I use martyrdom for the lucky extra kill when I die. Then people always wan't to say "So you have to die to get a kill". It made me think..... What about Last Stand. No one says anything about this, but if you put last stand with juggarnaut it is way worse than martyrdom. Yes you may be still alive, but technically you should be dead. So you are killing people after they kill you. So those people also need to die to get a kill. I think Last Stand is worse than Martyrdom because you can run away from Martyrdom (Not including the times where you run into it because you didn't kill that person). With Last Stand if you are out in the open and they have a D.E. you could be very screwed. Especially if you have to reload. So post wich you hate more and why. Don't be afraid to really get in depth wich one you hate more. Also people with clan tags stateing how you have to die to get a kill with Martyrdom you might want to add Last Stand to that.
i hate martyrdom it should be removed the amount of times i've missed out on an airstrike/helicopter becuase of it. but I use it, becuase it gets 3-4 kills a game.
people say 'well just dont run over to the body for a few seconds it's not that hard' but it usually gets me when i'm in the corner of a room and dropped someone, i just cannot get out of there fast enough
Well if you have a 150+ kill game with less than 40 deaths not useing martyrdom, I think you have proved that you don't need to die to get a kill even if in the game after you do use martyrdom. Last stand takes very little skill and juggurnaut needless to say. If you wanted to keep going at that rate you could pick apart every perk untill you ruin the game of perks.