(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Ok lets start. Sometimes I use martyrdom for the lucky extra kill when I die. Then people always wan't to say "So you have to die to get a kill". It made me think..... What about Last Stand. No one says anything about this, but if you put last stand with juggarnaut it is way worse than martyrdom. Yes you may be still alive, but technically you should be dead. So you are killing people after they kill you. So those people also need to die to get a kill. I think Last Stand is worse than Martyrdom because you can run away from Martyrdom (Not including the times where you run into it because you didn't kill that person). With Last Stand if you are out in the open and they have a D.E. you could be very screwed. Especially if you have to reload. So post wich you hate more and why. Don't be afraid to really get in depth wich one you hate more. Also people with clan tags stateing how you have to die to get a kill with Martyrdom you might want to add Last Stand to that.

they both piss me off so i've stuck with steady aim.

personally martydom is worse because if you are shooting 2 people in one place and the first one that you kill has martydom you have to kill the other one too but by the time you kill the second one the grenade is about to explode

Last stand is worse because when you think you kill them there still alive and you have to waste more ammo to kill em. and martyrdom you can just run out of the grenades range