Post: The Answer to All the Complaining.
Options
11-23-2010, 12:37 AM
#1
PULS3
< ^ > < ^ >
This EXACT SAME THING Happened When World at War was Released.
So to those who are not blinded by Fanboyism, and/or plain Stupidity; Here is why there is so many Cry Babies:
Like I stated above, this Exact same thing happened when World at War was Released.
What Happened you ask?
Well When World at War was Released, MANY people bought the Game Expecting to perform well online immediately, just like they did in Modern Warfare.
But the thing is:
1. They didn't expect that they would have to get used to Weapons with Recoil, or Weapons that take a decent amount of skill.
2. They Didn't Expect to have to get use to maps that were well laid out and actually required skill and thinking.
3. They did expect that World at War Take would require More Skill.
So When those people expecting to dominate immediately after putting the Disk in didn't do so well, they got Mad and Stomped around and Cried. Claiming that World at War Sucked and Treyarch was a Horrible Developer. Neither of which are anywhere near Truthful Statements.
So Here we Are, Two Years Later.
Treyarch Releases Black Ops, and yet again people are starting up the game Expecting to instantly dominate.
And they Are Not instantly dominating, Again.
They claim the Maps are Horrible because they have no good camping spots. They Claim All the Maps are like one Big Maze!
^^^ HAHAHA LOLOL!!! The Maps ACTUALLY require thought about where to go and what to do!
They Claim the Guns Suck because they Have Recoil, and they can't run around hip firing with every weapon in the game!
They Complain about not being able to use Cheap Tactics like Quick Scoping and Noob Tubes.
They Complain Because Black Ops is Actually a Well Balanced Game.
They Say Black Ops Sucks!
They Say Treyarch Is the Worst Developer Ever.
What they Fail to Realize, is that Black Ops is Harder, and more competitive Online. That Black Ops weapons, Perks, and Maps take Practice and Skill. That its Nothing like the Mainstreamed-for-noobs-and-kids modern warfare 2.
What they Fail to Realize, is that Black Ops is the REAL Call of Duty.
The following 36 users say thank you to PULS3 for this useful post:
_Reaper_, -〤-, マトリョーシカ しやん, ⒿⒺⒷⓇⓄ, 3arc, billionk, Camaro, Carbon0x, DayNNite, dfrost182, Diezel, FlyingIrishMan, Gordon, Jamesyy, jfurlough, KillaPwner, knightmare0000, Lampardispoo, lmg123, manirelli, Markie-, Mercenary95, Night Wolf, Octavia, sballstars06, shawry, Tazox94, teeth08, TheMagicN, toonsoldier, toophat2fly, Cory, tykmerc, Wykydtron, xxMike42080xx
11-23-2010, 09:10 PM
#56
Cyber Altair
League Champion
11-23-2010, 09:24 PM
#57
Snypar
Bounty hunter
Originally posted by xxMike42080xx
Quickscoping? serious? That was so lame and completely unrealistic.
Running around with a SMG is realistic is it? Stop using realism in a VIDEO GAME argument, games are not realistic, they're made for fun and to have a good time. You want realism, go join the army and run into "spawns" with your MP5K.
11-23-2010, 09:43 PM
#58
lilnatsfan44
At least I can fight
Originally posted by ez2animate
Implying they didn't know this? Of course they know you tryhardscopers are going to be pissed, but they obviously know that it's for the better, so like I say to just about anybody crying about quickscoping, go back to mw2.
I've been quickscoping since cod4. So shut up. You probably don't even own COD4.
11-23-2010, 09:45 PM
#59
Dan0692
Molestation Enthusiast
Originally posted by lilnatsfan44
I've been quickscoping since cod4. So shut up. You probably don't even own COD4.
Every single thread i've seen you no thank people who say they like the game. I think you're just butthurt because they changed the game a little so you actually have to use tactics to play the game and not just run and gun with a sniper.
11-23-2010, 09:52 PM
#60
lilnatsfan44
At least I can fight
Originally posted by Dan0692
Every single thread i've seen you no thank people who say they like the game. I think you're just butthurt because they changed the game a little so you actually have to use tactics to play the game and not just run and gun with a sniper.
What is your problem...? I clearly said I loved the game. . . but I also really like to snipe. And I run and gun with a lot of guns -mostly the famas. But unlike previous Cod's, nobody feels that comfortable with a sniper rife, especially on close quarters maps.
11-23-2010, 10:00 PM
#62
Grannez
Keeper
so true, so true!
But i understand those who complains about the bugs, ive seen how black ops used to be at the pc, it was shit with the lagg, and the server syst on ps3 sux. but away from that, there is way too many who complains about the game cuz they suck... ive seen many of my friends who reaped at mw2 sucking balls now
But i understand those who complains about the bugs, ive seen how black ops used to be at the pc, it was shit with the lagg, and the server syst on ps3 sux. but away from that, there is way too many who complains about the game cuz they suck... ive seen many of my friends who reaped at mw2 sucking balls now
11-23-2010, 10:17 PM
#63
Dan0692
Molestation Enthusiast
Originally posted by lilnatsfan44
What is your problem...? I clearly said I loved the game. . . but I also really like to snipe. And I run and gun with a lot of guns -mostly the famas. But unlike previous Cod's, nobody feels that comfortable with a sniper rife, especially on close quarters maps.
That I do agree with. There aren't a selection of big maps. All medium.
11-23-2010, 10:31 PM
#64
Craig1690x
Stupid is Stupid does
Originally posted by PULS3
I've noticed a lot of Complaining about the Multi-Player, and I have to say its all absolutely Hilarious!
This EXACT SAME THING Happened When World at War was Released.
So to those who are not blinded by Fanboyism, and/or plain Stupidity; Here is why there is so many Cry Babies:
Like I stated above, this Exact same thing happened when World at War was Released.
What Happened you ask?
Well When World at War was Released, MANY people bought the Game Expecting to perform well online immediately, just like they did in Modern Warfare.
But the thing is:
1. They didn't expect that they would have to get used to Weapons with Recoil, or Weapons that take a decent amount of skill.
2. They Didn't Expect to have to get use to maps that were well laid out and actually required skill and thinking.
3. They did expect that World at War Take would require More Skill.
So When those people expecting to dominate immediately after putting the Disk in didn't do so well, they got Mad and Stomped around and Cried. Claiming that World at War Sucked and Treyarch was a Horrible Developer. Neither of which are anywhere near Truthful Statements.
So Here we Are, Two Years Later.
Treyarch Releases Black Ops, and yet again people are starting up the game Expecting to instantly dominate.
And they Are Not instantly dominating, Again.
They claim the Maps are Horrible because they have no good camping spots. They Claim All the Maps are like one Big Maze!
^^^ HAHAHA LOLOL!!! The Maps ACTUALLY require thought about where to go and what to do!
They Claim the Guns Suck because they Have Recoil, and they can't run around hip firing with every weapon in the game!
They Complain about not being able to use Cheap Tactics like Quick Scoping and Noob Tubes.
They Complain Because Black Ops is Actually a Well Balanced Game.
They Say Black Ops Sucks!
They Say Treyarch Is the Worst Developer Ever.
What they Fail to Realize, is that Black Ops is Harder, and more competitive Online. That Black Ops weapons, Perks, and Maps take Practice and Skill. That its Nothing like the Mainstreamed-for-noobs-and-kids modern warfare 2.
What they Fail to Realize, is that Black Ops is the REAL Call of Duty.
This EXACT SAME THING Happened When World at War was Released.
So to those who are not blinded by Fanboyism, and/or plain Stupidity; Here is why there is so many Cry Babies:
Like I stated above, this Exact same thing happened when World at War was Released.
What Happened you ask?
Well When World at War was Released, MANY people bought the Game Expecting to perform well online immediately, just like they did in Modern Warfare.
But the thing is:
1. They didn't expect that they would have to get used to Weapons with Recoil, or Weapons that take a decent amount of skill.
2. They Didn't Expect to have to get use to maps that were well laid out and actually required skill and thinking.
3. They did expect that World at War Take would require More Skill.
So When those people expecting to dominate immediately after putting the Disk in didn't do so well, they got Mad and Stomped around and Cried. Claiming that World at War Sucked and Treyarch was a Horrible Developer. Neither of which are anywhere near Truthful Statements.
So Here we Are, Two Years Later.
Treyarch Releases Black Ops, and yet again people are starting up the game Expecting to instantly dominate.
And they Are Not instantly dominating, Again.
They claim the Maps are Horrible because they have no good camping spots. They Claim All the Maps are like one Big Maze!
^^^ HAHAHA LOLOL!!! The Maps ACTUALLY require thought about where to go and what to do!
They Claim the Guns Suck because they Have Recoil, and they can't run around hip firing with every weapon in the game!
They Complain about not being able to use Cheap Tactics like Quick Scoping and Noob Tubes.
They Complain Because Black Ops is Actually a Well Balanced Game.
They Say Black Ops Sucks!
They Say Treyarch Is the Worst Developer Ever.
What they Fail to Realize, is that Black Ops is Harder, and more competitive Online. That Black Ops weapons, Perks, and Maps take Practice and Skill. That its Nothing like the Mainstreamed-for-noobs-and-kids modern warfare 2.
What they Fail to Realize, is that Black Ops is the REAL Call of Duty.
true but world at war sucked it was dark and scary
And ii hate scary things why cant it be like a pretty rainbow ?
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
