(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I just finished the game on Veteran. I have 44 of 45 pieces of Intel. I know exactly where the last piece is, however, the Intel is simply not there. The last piece of Intel I need is on the "Just Like Old Times" mission. It is the third piece of Intel that is sitting on the crate near the black boxes right after Price says "Use your Thermals to take out the enemies". It's simply not there, you can see the empty space where the laptop sits but nope. I have restarted the mission 4 times. Everytime its missing.

This is last piece of Intel and would give me 100% completion in the Campaign and I would have this game 100% complete from multiplayer to campaign.

So does anybody got a clue why these assholes at InfinityWard decided to put such a half-ass,(excuse my french) piece of shit game like this on the market.

And before I go any further. Yes this game is crap. All of it. Everything from leveling the playing field for noobs on Multiplayer, to modded lobbies, to carepackage and javelin glitches, hacked leaderboads and missing Intel items: All of it.

I'll tell you why they did it.

You really wanna know?

InfinityWard did this because they know they cannot stop players from modding their game and using all different kinds of game exploits. They produced this (pardon me) God-awful-****ing game so that Activision can build its case that there needs to be network policing.

And we, the gaming community, fell head first into their trap.

Let me ask you something.

Have ever wonder why there was no Beta released before this game came out?

I'll tell you why.

If InfinityWard did release a Beta, then that forces them to address many problems before the game releases. After its released they can simply blame the gaming community for exploiting their game.

Pausible deniability, people.

Do you expect me to believe all the time they spent on this game, they didn't figure out that if you jump over something with a carepackage marker and switch weapons you'll get another one after you throw it.

It took $1 billion dollars and a conspiracy firing of InfinityWard Exec's to figure that out ?

Well shit me a golden hammer.

They knew all along. They planned it and we bit hook, line and sinker.

Activision and many other developers have been pushing for this for quite sometime and they will use this game as an example as to why they need it. A $1 billion dollar game so hacked up you need a surgeon to stitch it back together.

In the near future when you purchase a game or online account you will pay a little extra fee. That fee will go towards monitioring you play their game so they can feel better about the product they produced. Nevermind if the game is flawed in some way and should have been corrected in development. You are not expected to exploit that game and will be watched closely.

Wake up people.

I say screw you Activision. I'll play your poorly developed game, however I damn well please. I bought it. I don't see the caisher in the Walmart Gardening Department monitioring the guy who just bought 10 grow lamps and 2 bags of potting soil.

What makes you so special?

Why must I invite you in to my home so you can watch me play your ****ed up game?

Are you going to tell me that it's for the greater good of the gaming community to have the special task force to watch your servers? Well maybe if you didn't put such trash out on the shelf you wouldn't need people montioring it. Ever thought of that.

So here's what I am going to do. I am going to hack this game, get my last piece of Intel so that I have 100% complete on everything, get my spinning skull emblem and never buy another game from you again. I don't give a rats ass if you make the biggest, badest FPS game ever. You won't receive a dime from me, then you won't have anybody but yourself to blame when things get screwed up. I'll resort to playing original Nintendo before I pay you to monitor me. Somebody should be monitoring your ass. Not mine. I didn't develop a flawed game, make over a billion dollars and then turn around and blame the game players for exploiting it. YOU DID.

Now, I am off to pay a hacker to hack your game so I get my spinning skull emblem. Just so you can ban me, which is what you wanted all along so you can make a solid case for your Gaming Gestapo.

Good riddance.

Yeah right, the guy can't even manage his own Tweeter page. He is a pawn in the game.

---------- Post added at 03:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:38 PM ----------

Last point and I will let this thread go.

Since it appears more and more likely that we are moving towards a per game playing fee and that portions of these fees will go towards funding these network overseers. It is our right, as gamers that we require the same over watch placed on us to be placed on the companies producing these games.

A simple system of checks and balances will do nicely.

Have you ever been duped into buying a new game because the marketing commercials look really great only to get home to find the game lasted 2 hours and it wasn’t enjoyable at all?

Of course you have, you wouldn’t be a true gamer if this had not happened to you.

It is our right, as gamers to insure that games that cost $60 are indeed a $60 value for the gamer. If it is a half ass job then charge half the price. It is essential that we demand the same protection from the gaming gaints that they are demanding from us. A "Gaming Bill of Rights" so to speak, known now as the Code of Conduct for gamers should be placed on companies developing these games. Standard practices should be put in place to verify the quality, content and playability of each and every game produced that charges a premium amount for their game. If a company decides they cannot meet these standards then the price will reflect accordingly. The FCC regulates cable companies, NTSB regulates the airlines but who is regulating our gaming industry?

That’s like the Wild West out there.

Any company can just start up at will, produce a shitty game and sell it for $60. Sure we rate games, but the ratings are so skewed that there is almost no consistence leaving these rating useless. One site might rate a game with a 70, while another site would rate the same game with an 86. What does that 16 point difference mean? Nobody knows accept for personal preference of the rater. Maybe that person liked playing RPG’s or FPS and consistently rates Sports games with lower scores.

These practices will not change tomorrow, next week or even next year. But if we start now and ban together with other members from other communities in the long run these gaming companies will be forced to produce quality products by our rules and not theirs.


Gamers Bill of Rights
Amendment 1: If you want us to follow your rules then you are going to follow and meet our expectations.

Thank you for listening and please feel free to add any Amendments as you you see fit.

dude awesome post, it kinda says it all

IW fails lol

THERE WAS A BETA!!! it was private they didnt release it to normal people because that would ruin it! they sent it off to private places so that no secrets got out and so that more people would get interested. and why the hacks and glitches didnt start showing up until they patched the first glitch, which was the javelin glitch. once they did that they messed up a couple of the codes so STFU u ßitch

if IW cared about the game it would have been better they have the potential to make great games look at cod4 if they really would have cared they would have made a masterpiece they simply just did not try there hardest they know people will buy there game so they did not have to try now lets say cod4 sucked i bet they would have put there souls into mw2 and it would have been better they made mw2 for cash

i like when people say waw sucks i ask how? it might have some over powered guns and shit like that but there was never any problems like there is on mw2

I love you lmao this was written out VERY well!
+REP

You know what's even worse? Infinity Ward fired off the original makers of the Call of Duty series. No wonder the original creators of this game had a lawsuit against Infinity Ward. They are just selfish and greedy bastards looking for money in every single hole.

@italkalot: Tell me then, why did Bungie release Halo 3 as a beta? Why are they releasing Halo: Reach as a beta? They know people are going to ruin it.

i agree with you 100% hacked up to death this, also bullet damage from guns is flawed if your hit by a sniper you should be dead or have no limb! no carry on running then kill you with a single fire from a pistol!

damn right, i sold this piece of shit game yesterday and i'm very happy with my choice