(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hey I thought this was a great comparisson!
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZEwTX8NL9s&feature=channel[/ame]


Many of my friends and I have been talking about whats better B 50. Cal or the intervention.

Mainly I like the intervention more because it has better accurracy-no scopeee and its bolt action + the barrett has waaaay to many hit markers, please share your opinion.

intervention im beast with it

intervention for no scopes, barret for everything else

I use both of them. In 1v1 sniper matches and online i use the intervention and im beats with it currently on a 1v1 record of 38-0. But i have lately been using the barret, and i kinda like it. Its different for quickscoping because it is quicker going into the scope and scopes in a little different. but once you get used to this chaange it is pretty decent.

i've not really used the intervention as much as the barret 50, and in my opinion i favour the barret, it's like my deadly thermal baby in maps :p

im just sick of people telling me im a noob for using the barrett. I love that crap, after a match in the next game lobby "Dude use the intervention you noob" after pressing mute i laugh, because i usually do fair with barrett. but w/e preferences

50 Cal no sweat, so much easier for quick scoping

Intervention..is the best out of all the sniperz..in Mw2

intervention is my fav, best gun in mw2 =)

M21 with a mod one pull of the trigger is a 2shot burst game over but if i had to play right i would say intevention