(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hey I thought this was a great comparisson!
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZEwTX8NL9s&feature=channel[/ame]


Many of my friends and I have been talking about whats better B 50. Cal or the intervention.

Mainly I like the intervention more because it has better accurracy-no scopeee and its bolt action + the barrett has waaaay to many hit markers, please share your opinion.

intervention bcuz the 50 cal for sum reason gets to many hitmarkers

Honestly I cannot stand the recoil of the Barret 50-cal and it is so-loud even with a silencer, whereas the Intervention is nice shooting!

the 50 cal alwayz workz better for me, the intervention iz still a good gun thou i use it for hardcore matches and the barett for normal matchez

Invervention Definately

easier no scopes, although across map shots can b difficult

Personally, out of those two, I would prefer the Intervention. It seems like it has a bit better accuracy. Though my sniper of choice is definitely the M21 with a suppressor.

right on dude, it's way better, less hitmarkers

I think that the Intervention is quite good but the Barett is the better Weapon because you have semi-automatic

intervention for quickscoping but barret for camping if you get a hit marker you have time to hit them again but because intervention recoil and bolt action i always miss secon shot lol