Originally posted by xVii
It is faster to throw stuns. It's not because people want a more fast paced game, it's because it's faster, which means it gives you an advantage. I'd much rather use something that can be done quickly and let me shoot fast after than do something that delays my shooting for a second or two. If you haven't realize, 1 second can make a huge difference in any call of duty game.
Back on topic, I really enjoy quickscoping. Some people do it purely because they think it's "pro" and will make them cool. I do it mostly because it lets you get close range kils with a sniper, lets you take out a large number of enemies in a few seconds, faster and more efficiently than with any other gun. I also think it's just fun to do and looks neat. It's a challenge, and makes it fun. If someone's too far away to quick scope, I won't hesitate to scope in for a few seconds.
What I really hate though, are the people who just sit in one spot with their snipers continually aimed down the sight. It really annoys me.
thats true, but i rely mostly on the purpose of the grenade more than the quickness it is thrown. say if youre going up against a sniper, which would be most effective? flash or stun?
thats true also, but i would only quickscope if i was face to face with the person. if i wasnt, i would pull out a pistol and shoot them because u know of course u can pull it out the fastest. plus i also would want the kill with the secondary because ive completed 2 of the sniper veteran challenges :p