Post: World War 3?
05-27-2009, 10:14 AM #1
Rage
NGU Original
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Originally posted by TimesOnline
WARSHIPS patrolled the Sea of Japan and Patriot batteries were set up around Tokyo yesterday as North Korea counted down to a missile launch intended to challenge President Barack Obama as he attends the G20 summit in London.Two Japanese guided-missile destroyers set sail under orders to intercept the Taepodong-2 if the launch goes wrong and it threatens to come down in Japan, a key US ally. North Korea has said any interception would amount to an act of war.

Kim Jong-il, the North Korean dictator, has hinted that if the missile is destroyed, his country will strike back violently, conduct a second nuclear weapons test and ruin years of American disarmament diplomacy.

North Korea, which conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, maintains that the Taepodong-2 is to launch a satellite into space for peaceful purposes. The US and Japan think it is a long-range missile designed for atomic warheads. Experts say the missile could be fired any time from today, although the North Koreans have set a date between April 4 and 8.

The launch has become a test of American power, according to one of the most senior foreign policy advisers in China. The US and Japan “will be bankrupt in reputation and dignity” if the missile violates Japanese sovereignty and is not destroyed, said Professor Zhang Lian-gui, of the Central Party school.
Related Links

* Japan ready to destroy North Korean rocket

* North Korea prepares for ‘satellite’ launch

His comments, in an official journal, showed how keenly Chinese leaders were watching Obama’s performance under pressure. Obama will have his first summit with President Hu Jintao in London this week.

American and Chinese ships recently clashed in the South China Sea and the two nations exchanged angry words about a Pentagon report on China’s military build-up. The Chinese have refused to persuade their North Korean ally to call off the launch and are standing back to see how America and its allies deal with it.

The potential for error on both sides is high. The missile’s planned trajectory takes it soaring into space on an arc that leads across Japan. Previous North Korean missiles have exploded in flight or veered off course, and the US antimissile technology has not been perfected. Tokyo’s sophisticated Aegis vessels, the Kongo and the Chokai, which carry SM-3 interceptor missiles, were sent into the seas between the Koreas and Japan yesterday morning.

They will be joined tomorrow by two US Aegis destroyers, the USS John S McCain, skippered by a Korean-American naval officer, and the USS Chaffee. South Korea has sent its own Aegis destroyer, the King Sejong the Great.

On land, Japanese units deployed the latest Pac3 Patriot missile batteries to protect political and financial districts in Tokyo yesterday. The public was asked to stay calm. The Americans are also ready for the risk of a North Korean revenge strike across the border with South Korea.

On February 11, Kim demoted his chief of staff, General Kim Kyok-sik, to command the Fourth Army Corps in a move that may have been a strategic deception.

The corps guards the western coast, a tangle of islands and inlets where the border is disputed and where bloody naval battles between north and south claimed many lives in 1999 and 2002.

The state media announced that the outgoing chief of staff had also lost his seat in “elections” to North Korea’s rubber-stamp parliament. In retrospect, that seemed too simple. North Korea jealously guards its internal secrets and rarely discloses such a fall from favour. It may have been intended to deceive.

Analysts now suspect the “Dear Leader” may have deliberately placed the trusted man he wanted to command the west coast in preparation for another fight. The posting came less than two weeks after North Korea warned that it was scrapping all its accords with the south and would not respect the maritime borderline.


For full article go to: You must login or register to view this content.


Could this be world war 3?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
06-03-2009, 12:12 AM #29
The worlds gonna end sooner or later the mayans predicted that there civilisation/world would end 22 december 2012 so theres a date to add to your calendar. Also i remember hearing about russian jets flying into and through British territory without authorisation nothing about bombers flying towards dover with a full payload of nukes onboard and in a Nuclear war there really are no winners you just **** up our planet even more than it alredy is sure, green peace will be happy.
06-03-2009, 12:15 AM #30
Originally posted by SkiLLz View Post
The worlds gonna end sooner or later the mayans predicted that there civilisation/world would end 22 december 2012 so theres a date to add to your calendar. Also i remember hearing about russian jets flying into and through British territory without authorisation nothing about bombers flying towards dover with a full payload of nukes onboard and in a Nuclear war there really are no winners you just **** up our planet even more than it alredy is sure, green peace will be happy.


I bet you that will not happen.
06-03-2009, 03:44 AM #31
RICHIE209
March 6, 2011.
Originally posted by Luke View Post
The only thing that will start another World War if a Hitler-like dictator tries to take over the world...in my opinion.


NK's dictator is crazy, that's the thing.
06-03-2009, 07:30 AM #32
Originally posted by RICHIE209 View Post
NK's dictator is crazy, that's the thing.


Yeah, that's true.
They are also backed by China and Russia.
China has one of the world's largest military.
Russia has the most nuclear weapons in the world.
North Korea has a crazy dictator that makes everyone hang pictures of him and his dad in their homes.

One thing though, South Korea and Japan, the two countries North Korea is most interested in bombing, are backed by the US, which is backed by NATO.


Communism sucks :(
We borrow money from China....
06-03-2009, 01:54 PM #33
RICHIE209
March 6, 2011.
Originally posted by dukie827 View Post
Yeah, that's true.
They are also backed by China and Russia.
China has one of the world's largest military.
Russia has the most nuclear weapons in the world.
North Korea has a crazy dictator that makes everyone hang pictures of him and his dad in their homes.

One thing though, South Korea and Japan, the two countries North Korea is most interested in bombing, are backed by the US, which is backed by NATO.


Communism sucks :(
We borrow money from China....


Russia's on our side no? Aren't they are in the U.N? And i thought China was with us.
06-03-2009, 02:26 PM #34
Originally posted by RICHIE209 View Post
Russia's on our side no? Aren't they are in the U.N? And i thought China was with us.

Russia is not in the U.N. and China is with North Korea. We are more allies with Russia now, because they are scared of North Korea, because they don't have a missile defense system, like the U.S. does. Basically if someone sends 2 or 3 nukes to the US, we will be able to blow them up before they even get close enough to kill a single person. If Russia gets 2 or 3 nukes, they will lose 2 or 3 cities.
06-03-2009, 05:34 PM #35
ZeroKills
Bounty hunter
hahahahahahahahaha nuclear warfare = BIG BOOM!!!!1111!!!!!

but seriously if there was a big ****in war i probabley wouldnt have to go to my nazi ass school.
06-03-2009, 08:58 PM #36
RICHIE209
March 6, 2011.
Originally posted by One View Post
Russia is not in the U.N. and China is with North Korea. We are more allies with Russia now, because they are scared of North Korea, because they don't have a missile defense system, like the U.S. does. Basically if someone sends 2 or 3 nukes to the US, we will be able to blow them up before they even get close enough to kill a single person. If Russia gets 2 or 3 nukes, they will lose 2 or 3 cities.


Russia is on our side, I read on yahoo that China was upset with the North for some reason, though i forgot what it said :/.....China could actually cripple the North if they decided to stop sending supplies(food, aid, etc).

As far as the nukes go, we only really have to worry about China if they do take the North's side. NK's nukes aren't very up-to-date
06-03-2009, 09:43 PM #37
H₂O
Samurai Poster
Originally posted by RICHIE209 View Post
It's against the geniva convention and U.N rules.


Who said we did it?Winky Winky

Originally posted by RICHIE209 View Post
China could actually cripple the North if they decided to stop sending supplies(food, aid, etc


True dat. China gives weapons to NK and Darfur, and the US tells them not to. But we dont have a say really because China bought a lot of our debt..

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo