Post: World War 3?
05-27-2009, 10:14 AM #1
Rage
NGU Original
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Originally posted by TimesOnline
WARSHIPS patrolled the Sea of Japan and Patriot batteries were set up around Tokyo yesterday as North Korea counted down to a missile launch intended to challenge President Barack Obama as he attends the G20 summit in London.Two Japanese guided-missile destroyers set sail under orders to intercept the Taepodong-2 if the launch goes wrong and it threatens to come down in Japan, a key US ally. North Korea has said any interception would amount to an act of war.

Kim Jong-il, the North Korean dictator, has hinted that if the missile is destroyed, his country will strike back violently, conduct a second nuclear weapons test and ruin years of American disarmament diplomacy.

North Korea, which conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, maintains that the Taepodong-2 is to launch a satellite into space for peaceful purposes. The US and Japan think it is a long-range missile designed for atomic warheads. Experts say the missile could be fired any time from today, although the North Koreans have set a date between April 4 and 8.

The launch has become a test of American power, according to one of the most senior foreign policy advisers in China. The US and Japan “will be bankrupt in reputation and dignity” if the missile violates Japanese sovereignty and is not destroyed, said Professor Zhang Lian-gui, of the Central Party school.
Related Links

* Japan ready to destroy North Korean rocket

* North Korea prepares for ‘satellite’ launch

His comments, in an official journal, showed how keenly Chinese leaders were watching Obama’s performance under pressure. Obama will have his first summit with President Hu Jintao in London this week.

American and Chinese ships recently clashed in the South China Sea and the two nations exchanged angry words about a Pentagon report on China’s military build-up. The Chinese have refused to persuade their North Korean ally to call off the launch and are standing back to see how America and its allies deal with it.

The potential for error on both sides is high. The missile’s planned trajectory takes it soaring into space on an arc that leads across Japan. Previous North Korean missiles have exploded in flight or veered off course, and the US antimissile technology has not been perfected. Tokyo’s sophisticated Aegis vessels, the Kongo and the Chokai, which carry SM-3 interceptor missiles, were sent into the seas between the Koreas and Japan yesterday morning.

They will be joined tomorrow by two US Aegis destroyers, the USS John S McCain, skippered by a Korean-American naval officer, and the USS Chaffee. South Korea has sent its own Aegis destroyer, the King Sejong the Great.

On land, Japanese units deployed the latest Pac3 Patriot missile batteries to protect political and financial districts in Tokyo yesterday. The public was asked to stay calm. The Americans are also ready for the risk of a North Korean revenge strike across the border with South Korea.

On February 11, Kim demoted his chief of staff, General Kim Kyok-sik, to command the Fourth Army Corps in a move that may have been a strategic deception.

The corps guards the western coast, a tangle of islands and inlets where the border is disputed and where bloody naval battles between north and south claimed many lives in 1999 and 2002.

The state media announced that the outgoing chief of staff had also lost his seat in “elections” to North Korea’s rubber-stamp parliament. In retrospect, that seemed too simple. North Korea jealously guards its internal secrets and rarely discloses such a fall from favour. It may have been intended to deceive.

Analysts now suspect the “Dear Leader” may have deliberately placed the trusted man he wanted to command the west coast in preparation for another fight. The posting came less than two weeks after North Korea warned that it was scrapping all its accords with the south and would not respect the maritime borderline.


For full article go to: You must login or register to view this content.


Could this be world war 3?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
06-04-2009, 08:15 AM #38
China is the superior country in all of this, well kind of.
06-04-2009, 03:35 PM #39
Ronye West
Anti-HSx9
We would own the war, like what do you think call of duty was made for?
06-04-2009, 05:01 PM #40
xinfectedsoulx
Daddy's home.
Originally posted by dukie827 View Post
China is the superior country in all of this, well kind of.


But the Chinese guns would break within 5 mins if its anything like their other products.

Originally posted by RoNalD View Post
We would own the war, like what do you think call of duty was made for?


So why has the war in Iraq and Afghanistan still going on over 8 years?
06-05-2009, 12:28 AM #41
RICHIE209
March 6, 2011.
Originally posted by xinfectedsoulx View Post
So why has the war in Iraq and Afghanistan still going on over 8 years?


Money and rules.
06-05-2009, 12:09 PM #42
Elder Legendah
┌∩┐(◕_◕Winky Winky┌∩┐
meh there might be a world war 3 but we don't need to know until MW2 comes out Happy

jk there wont be a war imo,there would be so many countries against them and i say they know the risks!?
06-05-2009, 02:47 PM #43
xinfectedsoulx
Daddy's home.
Originally posted by RICHIE209 View Post
Money and rules.


Exactly, The rules need to change, a lot. Like there is a rule in the British army that if the enemy shoots you and you shoot back, then they drop their weapon the soldiers can not shoot them, even though they almost tried killing you. Its like they can pick the fight, when they want the fight and where they want the fight.
06-06-2009, 02:22 AM #44
RICHIE209
March 6, 2011.
Originally posted by xinfectedsoulx View Post
Exactly, The rules need to change, a lot. Like there is a rule in the British army that if the enemy shoots you and you shoot back, then they drop their weapon the soldiers can not shoot them, even though they almost tried killing you. Its like they can pick the fight, when they want the fight and where they want the fight.


Geneva convention+rules of engagement ftl.
06-06-2009, 07:29 AM #45
Originally posted by sider95 View Post
there would be so many countries against them and i say they know the risks!?


That is exactly why there is no WW3 right now. No country is retarded enough to actually start it because they can probably figure out what will happen. North Korea just likes to do things that scare the Japanese people.
06-06-2009, 03:32 PM #46
GuyAlmighty
Bounty hunter
I don't believe there will be another war. I believe only this;

[WS]pkgGOFXuYPw[/WS]

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo