Originally posted by c0dez0r
The only point I disagree with there is #3, how can you possibly justify "justice" with only locking them up? Say it was your son or daughter or close relative, would you STILL feel so strongly against the death of the offender? Rape or child molestation is horrific, not any less horrific than murder or such crimes, but it's very different and you can't rationally disagree with that.
Repeat offenders are generally just a waste of life, not worthy of air. What's the point in housing someone who evidently doesn't want to be on the outside world? He/she'd rather spend their lives in prison, yet, WE just make their lives easy by giving them what they want. If these people were being put to death rather than put into a holiday camp, perhaps then costs and such-like things would be reduced.
As you can tell I'm pretty adamant about this, not that it'd ever take shape in the UK, not in my lifetime anyway, I do feel it has to be implemented.
Rape and child molestation are not as bad as murder; it's as simple as the former two causing extreme grief and the latter ending you or someone else's life altogether.
As far as your language goes, it's almost medieval. You're putting everybody who commits and/or recommits a crime(s) into the same group, completely irrespective of how unique each person and each situation is. They are not a waste of life and they are not a waste of air. You've no right to tell anybody that any more so than they or I have the right to tell you the same.
Also, I've never been in prison, but I doubt it's a holiday camp. These people most often
do want to live in the outside world but are caught up in gangs, debt or any other of a myriad of potential issues.
As I've already said, countries that support rehabilitation
always get lower crime rates, whereas those (the United States is a good example) that favour strong punishment and the death penalty are some of the worst in the developed world.