Well there's really no need for me to post, is there... considering that moose guy said all but one thing that needed to be said:
Advertising yourself/having a signature on your art = bad
Bad bad bad bad bad. Well, there is always the exception to the rule, so let me rephrase myself: advertising yourself in your art is THE WORST POSSIBLE THING YOU CAN DO unless your advertising is actually part of the art. Let me repeat that: PART OF THE ART. If you're just going to slap your name on it so people knew who made it, you're making a mistake - the canvas is there for your art, not for your own false sense of security in knowing that people will say "Graham made that piece of art, no one else" when they look upon your brilliant masterpiece of shades and brushes. The sooner you learn that everything on your canvas is part of the piece of art, the better.
Did you know that the Mona Lisa doesn't have a signature on it? When da Vinci painted it the only signature of his was a very subtle one - the Vinci plant (for which he was named) that you can see in the painting, as well as in other da Vinci works.
---------- Post added at 10:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 PM ----------
Originally posted by graham78
btw I do sale signitures 2$ for each one! just pm me
I lol'd. Hard.