(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Sony Hunting Hackers Like Animals
Source: You must login or register to view this content. // By: ClutchLikeMelo // February 5, 2011

Sony is now taking a further step in protecting the security of the PS3. They've already took Geohot to court, and now plan on hunting down other hackers, firmware developers, and program creators. It's even rumored that Sony is checking sites like xxx-Scene, YouTube, Twitter, PayPal, and Slashdot to find the identities of the hackers who are continuously releasing and creating programs that further exploit the PlayStation 3.

Some of the big name hackers they're going after are Kmeaw, Wanikoko, KaKaRoTo, and Graf Chokolo who is currently working on returning Linux to the PS3.

Download and take a closer look at the legal documents below to get more details.

You must login or register to view this content.

what really SONY is doing by acting with these kind of manners and procedures or supposedly legal tactics, they are just letting us know that they are FEARED, feared of people like them(hackers) that at the beginning the felt confident of their technology,power,money and success. they showed us the NEW ERA the"PS3" full of graphics potential,blue laser technology,supposely(at the beginning) COMPUTER capabilities,this and that!!. but then they got GREEDY and confident, they forgot that others(GEOHOT,WANINKOKO,KMEW)and others might one day follow their success.
They(hackers)just wanted to show the world what SONY gave us to explore their technology and have fun with OUR product. now all of sudden is"YOU CAN'T TOUCH THIS" " YOU CAN'T TOUCH that" "omg" Security Breach!!!!, they underestimated their talent, creation,skills and gifted knowledge that these gifted guys showed us.
With their mind/skills showed SONY that with their machine can turn it to a SUPER MACHINE better than them, with just simply with their head and knowledge.
thats why sony is mad because in reality they can't simply accept that they got humiliated and embarrased with their own creation by such people that they considered INFERIOR than them. GEOHOT and the others showed sony that not only them(sony) have the"POWER" to CREATE the power to DEVELOP, and what do they(hackers) get in return"LEGAL SUIT","JAIL" PERSECUTION?. its not fair in a way well my whole point in all of this is that now its a crime to try to DEVELOP or CREATE something because its illegal now, if it's not thru SONY you're a crime.
but like GEO said "THEY WILL REMEMBER" that's what they FEARED.

uMadBro :FU:

Not really, but your lack of intelligence is funny.

You don't even have the mental stability to come up with a better insult.

Hooked on Phonix didn't work for you.

Guess it didn't work for you either
"Hooked on Phonics"

It's actually called Phonix, originally.

It's still called "Phonix" here. You should really learn your information before bringing it up.

K thanks, bye.

Where is here? Location: Sony's asshole?

You must login or register to view this content.

uMad :FU:

Edit: ur 16 years old, you don't know shit. lmao

Well, I did not even stated about "how hard learning to hack is", I compared my statement to the rabbit one as a analogy (in case you have not suspected while reading my post) as I did not indicated animal to hackers in a literal way. As for your claim on "there's not that many legit hackers out there", do you statistical proof on this matter which you are trying to reason with? I am saying "hackers" in an more broad sense than stating to only "sony bypassing" for again, which I did not even elaborated those words in my post. For your illegitimate assumptions on "you need to realize how much learning you have to do to actually hack", I have more than enough experience in field of information systems than you could possibly have in the last 15 years (including my bachelors in CIS/with minor in business management, with many many on-the-job experience including some database IT firms w/CCIE and CCNA certificates). I ask you, do you even have any experience (I meant real 'on-the-job' experiences) in computer programming such as Borland Delphi, Pascal, APL, JScript, IBM Informix-4GL (in retrospect, this method is not being learnt anymore in terms of binding SQL functions), SQL servers ASP+, etc.? (which truthfully, spent many years for each language including today still learning and improving on my skills) If you do, I like you to decompile or form a new processes given by my direction, if not I suggest you to keep your illegitimate assumptions to yourself before discussing to anyone without any prior knowledge of that persons'. For these type of "bypassing", the correct term is more likely "cracker", and of course, a computer programming language is like a new language (almost all computer programmers or informational IT systems analyst such as myself knows it doesn't take "overnight"). There are many "hackers" or people who are capable to do so out there (there is no need for statistical proof on this matter as it is always in exponential growth which means 'loss of track' for a simple census to be taken accounted for), it is like a black market of worlds arms dealer (another analogy; 'worlds arms dealer' is a non literal reference to broad types of 'hackers', you can't simply get rid of all these 'arm dealers' entities out, there are already many people 'lined up' to take place of those who got ridden out from this 'black market' ('black market' is also an non literal analogy to the 'informational world' . You might think there are only few 'legit hackers' in certain sectors of 'hacking', but in reality, there are alot more than you can encounter; just some of them keeps a low profile or not even publish their 'efforts' to the world.

So lesson of my whole argument: Making Assumptions and/or stating ignorance is a grave mistake when you don't know that person in its entirety, and there are many broad types of hackers out there then you think there are limited amount of 'legit hackers'.

Again for quod erat faciendum:
Your sense of intelligence is as dull as your dumbfounded stupidity -Smushpie

Do not try to reason my argument without valid substantiations, fin :n00b:

Oh shizz nets..

LOL Its like Mason from Black Ops Going after dah Ascension Scientist