How? NGU isnt on that list, its cuz were low key haha. :y:

How? NGU isnt on that list, its cuz were low key haha. :y:

You my friend, are an idiot.

Sony is going to win, why would they give up?

---------- Post added at 01:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:52 AM ----------



Is that all you can say, variations of "umadbro". Grow up, learn some more insults.

---------- Post added at 01:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 AM ----------




Are you really going to compare the mating of an animal to hackers?
For one, there's not that many legit hackers out there that are able to even bypass sony. There's maybe a few that Sony are going to take down right away. After that happens they won't have to wory for a bit.

Also, you need to realize how much learning you have to do to actually hack. You can't learn this stuff over-night, so meanwhile Sony is sueing or getting rid of the current hackers the others ones with either - Backdown, crawl into a hole and die, or try to keep on fighting then lose.

---------- Post added at 01:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:56 AM ----------



Our job?

You haven't done nothing, I really don't know why you people take credit or atleast try to take credit. All you're doing is downloading programs they created.

Also, why do you think Sony is "mad". They can sue without being mad, get over yourself already.

---------- Post added at 01:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:58 AM ----------



If sony wanted to, or even if they cared they could shut this site down over night..

FYI.

Well, I did not even stated about "how hard learning to hack is", I compared my statement to the rabbit one as a analogy (in case you have not suspected while reading my post) as I did not indicated animal to hackers in a literal way. As for your claim on "there's not that many legit hackers out there", do you statistical proof on this matter which you are trying to reason with? I am saying "hackers" in an more broad sense than stating to only "sony bypassing" for again, which I did not even elaborated those words in my post. For your illegitimate assumptions on "you need to realize how much learning you have to do to actually hack", I have more than enough experience in field of information systems than you could possibly have in the last 15 years (including my bachelors in CIS/with minor in business management, with many many on-the-job experience including some database IT firms w/CCIE and CCNA certificates). I ask you, do you even have any experience (I meant real 'on-the-job' experiences) in computer programming such as Borland Delphi, Pascal, APL, JScript, IBM Informix-4GL (in retrospect, this method is not being learnt anymore in terms of binding SQL functions), SQL servers ASP+, etc.? (which truthfully, spent many years for each language including today still learning and improving on my skills) If you do, I like you to decompile or form a new processes given by my direction, if not I suggest you to keep your illegitimate assumptions to yourself before discussing to anyone without any prior knowledge of that persons'. For these type of "bypassing", the correct term is more likely "cracker", and of course, a computer programming language is like a new language (almost all computer programmers or informational IT systems analyst such as myself knows it doesn't take "overnight"). There are many "hackers" or people who are capable to do so out there (there is no need for statistical proof on this matter as it is always in exponential growth which means 'loss of track' for a simple census to be taken accounted for), it is like a black market of worlds arms dealer (another analogy; 'worlds arms dealer' is a non literal reference to broad types of 'hackers', you can't simply get rid of all these 'arm dealers' entities out, there are already many people 'lined up' to take place of those who got ridden out from this 'black market' ('black market' is also an non literal analogy to the 'informational world' . You might think there are only few 'legit hackers' in certain sectors of 'hacking', but in reality, there are alot more than you can encounter; just some of them keeps a low profile or not even publish their 'efforts' to the world.

So lesson of my whole argument: Making Assumptions and/or stating ignorance is a grave mistake when you don't know that person in its entirety, and there are many broad types of hackers out there then you think there are limited amount of 'legit hackers'.

Again for quod erat faciendum:
Your sense of intelligence is as dull as your dumbfounded stupidity -Smushpie

Do not try to reason my argument without valid substantiations, fin :n00b:

If they continue their ways, i have heard of several hackers announcing if sony doesent chill out they will release some sort of permo-exploit.... sounds serious idk, sony is trying to get ballsey with the hackers? im not a hacker myself but.... lets just say i think sony might be close to the last straw

---------- Post added at 04:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:23 AM ----------




dont come up in here with your big book... you have too much time... hows that?

all i understood from that was, "big book"

okay...well I don't understand your 'big book' example and I am talking in formal English so no expectations from you* (maybe too young to understand)

This post was for Binary only, so I don't seek negative feedback for whom does not have a say in this issue

so if you can't understand what I just wrote here, Your not meant to understand because this is a more adult conversation if you want to put it in a way (last post was simple enough for people to understand it)